Components of production and productivity of agroecological white oats sown in no-tillage and conventional system

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Seidel, Edleusa Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Fey, Emerson, Souza Junior, José Barbosa de, Augusto, Júlio, Costa, Neumárcio Vila Nova da, Pietrowski , Vanda, Carvalho, Leidiane Coelho, Barilli, Diandro Ricardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31963
Resumo: The present study aimed to evaluate the morphological components and productivity of two agroecological white oat cultivars sown in two soil management systems: no-tillage and conventional system. The experiment was carried out at the Agroecology CVT, belonging to Unioeste in Entre Rios do Oeste, PR. A subplot was divided into two white bird cultivars: Corona and Artemis cultivated in the agroecological system. The cultivars were seeded in talhões, each talhão was divided into five soils, which constituted the repetitions. Approved forams: plant height, panicle compression, diameter of main stem and peduncle, number of spikelets per panicle, number of grains per panicle, number of panicles/m2 and productivity. The development of the bird culture was prejudiced by water deficit during the culture cycle that was only 90.80 mm. Or management of direct and conventional planting of only differently affected the cultivars. The greater diameter of the main stem and hectoliter weight was validated not to cultivate URS Corona, regardless of the management adopted. A higher productivity was observed not cultivating URS Corona, not a conventional-only preparation system with 1581.71 kg ha-1. The average productivity of the white bird cultivated in an agroecological system was 776.75 kg ha-1.
id UNIFEI_f829ab3da1ff4965e542c629c6cd42da
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31963
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Components of production and productivity of agroecological white oats sown in no-tillage and conventional systemComponentes de producción y productividad de aveia branca agroecológica semeadas en sistema de planta directa y convencionalComponentes de produção e produtividade de aveia branca agroecológica semeadas em sistema de plantio direto e convencionalSoil managementOrganic cultivationWinter culture.Manejo de soloCultivo orgânicoCultura de inverno.Manejo del sueloCultivo orgánicoCultura de invierno.The present study aimed to evaluate the morphological components and productivity of two agroecological white oat cultivars sown in two soil management systems: no-tillage and conventional system. The experiment was carried out at the Agroecology CVT, belonging to Unioeste in Entre Rios do Oeste, PR. A subplot was divided into two white bird cultivars: Corona and Artemis cultivated in the agroecological system. The cultivars were seeded in talhões, each talhão was divided into five soils, which constituted the repetitions. Approved forams: plant height, panicle compression, diameter of main stem and peduncle, number of spikelets per panicle, number of grains per panicle, number of panicles/m2 and productivity. The development of the bird culture was prejudiced by water deficit during the culture cycle that was only 90.80 mm. Or management of direct and conventional planting of only differently affected the cultivars. The greater diameter of the main stem and hectoliter weight was validated not to cultivate URS Corona, regardless of the management adopted. A higher productivity was observed not cultivating URS Corona, not a conventional-only preparation system with 1581.71 kg ha-1. The average productivity of the white bird cultivated in an agroecological system was 776.75 kg ha-1.El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar los componentes morfológicos y el rendimiento de dos cultivares agroecológicos de avena blanca sembrados en dos sistemas de manejo del suelo: labranza cero y sistema convencional. El experimento se llevó a cabo en la CVT de Agroecología, perteneciente a la Unioeste en Entre Rios do Oeste, PR. El diseño experimental utilizado fue completamente al azar en parcela dividida con cinco repeticiones. La parcela principal constó de dos sistemas de manejo del suelo: sistema de labranza cero y labranza convencional (dos rastras). La subparcela fueron dos cultivares de avena blanca: URS Corona e IPR Artemis cultivados en el sistema agroecológico. Los cultivares se sembraron en parcelas, cada parcela se dividió en cinco parcelas, las cuales constituyeron las repeticiones. Se evaluó: altura de planta, longitud de panícula, diámetro de tallo principal y tallo, número de espiguillas por panícula, número de granos por panícula, número de panículas/m2 y rendimiento. El desarrollo del cultivo de avena se vio obstaculizado por el déficit hídrico durante el ciclo de cultivo, que fue de sólo 90,80 mm. La labranza cero y el manejo convencional de labranza del suelo afectaron a los cultivares de manera diferente. Se evaluó el mayor diámetro del tallo principal y peso hectolítrico en el cultivar URS Corona, independientemente del manejo adoptado. La mayor productividad se observó en el cultivar URS Corona, en el sistema de labranza convencional con 1581,71 kg ha-1. El rendimiento promedio de avena blanca cultivada en sistema agroecológico fue de 776,75 kg ha-1.O presente estudo teve por objetivo avaliar os componentes morfológicos e a produtividade de duas cultivares de aveia branca agroecológica semeadas em dois manejos de solo: sistema de plantio direto e convencional. O experimento foi realizado no CVT de Agroecologia, pertencente a Unioeste em Entre Rios do Oeste, PR.  O delineamento experimental utilizado foi inteiramente ao acaso em parcela subdivida com cinco repetições. A parcela principal consistiu de dois manejos de solo: sistema de plantio direto e plantio convencional (duas gradagens). A subparcela foi dois cultivares de aveia branca: URS Corona e IPR Artemis cultivada no sistema agroecologia. Os cultivares foram semeados em talhões, cada talhão foi dividido em cinco glebas, que constituíram as repetições. Foram avaliados: altura de planta, comprimento de panícula, diâmetro de colmo principal e de pedúnculo, número de espiguetas por panícula, número de grãos por panícula, número de panículas/m2 e a produtividade. O desenvolvimento da cultura de aveia foi prejudicado pelo déficit hídrico durante o ciclo da cultura que foi de apenas 90,80 mm. O manejo de plantio direto e convencional de solo afetou diferentemente os cultivares. O maior diâmetro do colmo principal e peso hectolitro foi avaliado no cultivar URS Corona, independente do manejo adotado. A maior produtividade foi observada no cultivar URS Corona, no sistema de preparo de solo convencional com 1581,71 kg ha-1. A produtividade média da aveia branca cultivada em sistema agroecológico foi de 776,75 kg ha-1.Research, Society and Development2022-07-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3196310.33448/rsd-v11i10.31963Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 10; e44111031963Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 10; e44111031963Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 10; e441110319632525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31963/27527Copyright (c) 2022 Edleusa Pereira Seidel; Emerson Fey; José Barbosa de Souza Junior; Júlio Augusto; Neumárcio Vila Nova da Costa; Vanda Pietrowski ; Leidiane Coelho Carvalho; Diandro Ricardo Barillihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSeidel, Edleusa PereiraFey, EmersonSouza Junior, José Barbosa de Augusto, JúlioCosta, Neumárcio Vila Nova da Pietrowski , VandaCarvalho, Leidiane Coelho Barilli, Diandro Ricardo 2022-08-12T22:23:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31963Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:48:07.006935Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Components of production and productivity of agroecological white oats sown in no-tillage and conventional system
Componentes de producción y productividad de aveia branca agroecológica semeadas en sistema de planta directa y convencional
Componentes de produção e produtividade de aveia branca agroecológica semeadas em sistema de plantio direto e convencional
title Components of production and productivity of agroecological white oats sown in no-tillage and conventional system
spellingShingle Components of production and productivity of agroecological white oats sown in no-tillage and conventional system
Seidel, Edleusa Pereira
Soil management
Organic cultivation
Winter culture.
Manejo de solo
Cultivo orgânico
Cultura de inverno.
Manejo del suelo
Cultivo orgánico
Cultura de invierno.
title_short Components of production and productivity of agroecological white oats sown in no-tillage and conventional system
title_full Components of production and productivity of agroecological white oats sown in no-tillage and conventional system
title_fullStr Components of production and productivity of agroecological white oats sown in no-tillage and conventional system
title_full_unstemmed Components of production and productivity of agroecological white oats sown in no-tillage and conventional system
title_sort Components of production and productivity of agroecological white oats sown in no-tillage and conventional system
author Seidel, Edleusa Pereira
author_facet Seidel, Edleusa Pereira
Fey, Emerson
Souza Junior, José Barbosa de
Augusto, Júlio
Costa, Neumárcio Vila Nova da
Pietrowski , Vanda
Carvalho, Leidiane Coelho
Barilli, Diandro Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Fey, Emerson
Souza Junior, José Barbosa de
Augusto, Júlio
Costa, Neumárcio Vila Nova da
Pietrowski , Vanda
Carvalho, Leidiane Coelho
Barilli, Diandro Ricardo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Seidel, Edleusa Pereira
Fey, Emerson
Souza Junior, José Barbosa de
Augusto, Júlio
Costa, Neumárcio Vila Nova da
Pietrowski , Vanda
Carvalho, Leidiane Coelho
Barilli, Diandro Ricardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Soil management
Organic cultivation
Winter culture.
Manejo de solo
Cultivo orgânico
Cultura de inverno.
Manejo del suelo
Cultivo orgánico
Cultura de invierno.
topic Soil management
Organic cultivation
Winter culture.
Manejo de solo
Cultivo orgânico
Cultura de inverno.
Manejo del suelo
Cultivo orgánico
Cultura de invierno.
description The present study aimed to evaluate the morphological components and productivity of two agroecological white oat cultivars sown in two soil management systems: no-tillage and conventional system. The experiment was carried out at the Agroecology CVT, belonging to Unioeste in Entre Rios do Oeste, PR. A subplot was divided into two white bird cultivars: Corona and Artemis cultivated in the agroecological system. The cultivars were seeded in talhões, each talhão was divided into five soils, which constituted the repetitions. Approved forams: plant height, panicle compression, diameter of main stem and peduncle, number of spikelets per panicle, number of grains per panicle, number of panicles/m2 and productivity. The development of the bird culture was prejudiced by water deficit during the culture cycle that was only 90.80 mm. Or management of direct and conventional planting of only differently affected the cultivars. The greater diameter of the main stem and hectoliter weight was validated not to cultivate URS Corona, regardless of the management adopted. A higher productivity was observed not cultivating URS Corona, not a conventional-only preparation system with 1581.71 kg ha-1. The average productivity of the white bird cultivated in an agroecological system was 776.75 kg ha-1.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31963
10.33448/rsd-v11i10.31963
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31963
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i10.31963
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31963/27527
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 10; e44111031963
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 10; e44111031963
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 10; e44111031963
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052768691683328

Registros relacionados