From participatory democracy to de-democratization in Brazil: institutions of participation in crisis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fontes, Francisco Lucas de Lima
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Menezes, Monique, Lavor, Leopoldina, Lima, Izabelle Carvalho, Lima, Ludmilla Soares, Moura, Enedina Gizeli Albano, Araujo, Maria Laís Alves de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28534
Resumo: The objective of this theoretical essay was to analyze the relationship between social participation and Brazilian democracy in recent years. Considering that Brazilian democracy is in crisis, the question is: “What are the repercussions that such a scenario brings to participatory democracy and, more deeply, to institutions of participation?”. The essay benefited from a bibliographic survey and documental research, analyzing antagonistic cases in which the social participation agenda was understood: Decree Nº. 8.243, of 2014, which strengthened and articulated democratic mechanisms and instances during the government of then President Dilma Rousseff; and Decree Nº 9.759, of 2019, which limited and extinguished collegiate bodies, of the current President Jair Messias Bolsonaro. Through the analytical-conceptual framework of Charles Tilly, it is verified that the repercussions of the Decree Nº 9.759, of 2019, comprise scenarios that precede and indicate a de-democratization movement underway in the government of President Jair Messias Bolsonaro. It is understood that Brazilian democracy does not only take place through the representative model, but also through the participatory model (networks of trust). Participation institutions cannot be excluded from political processes and public action, due to administrative rationalization and resource savings, as the current President argues.
id UNIFEI_f950a7743a357a7e17539c13ba531a9f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28534
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling From participatory democracy to de-democratization in Brazil: institutions of participation in crisisDe la democracia participativa a la des-democratización en Brasil: instituciones de participación en crisisDa democracia participativa à desdemocratização no Brasil: instituições de participação em criseParticipatory democracySocial participationInstitutions of participationDe-democratization.Democracia participativaParticipación socialInstituciones de participaciónDes-democratización.Democracia participativaParticipação socialInstituições de participaçãoDesdemocratização.The objective of this theoretical essay was to analyze the relationship between social participation and Brazilian democracy in recent years. Considering that Brazilian democracy is in crisis, the question is: “What are the repercussions that such a scenario brings to participatory democracy and, more deeply, to institutions of participation?”. The essay benefited from a bibliographic survey and documental research, analyzing antagonistic cases in which the social participation agenda was understood: Decree Nº. 8.243, of 2014, which strengthened and articulated democratic mechanisms and instances during the government of then President Dilma Rousseff; and Decree Nº 9.759, of 2019, which limited and extinguished collegiate bodies, of the current President Jair Messias Bolsonaro. Through the analytical-conceptual framework of Charles Tilly, it is verified that the repercussions of the Decree Nº 9.759, of 2019, comprise scenarios that precede and indicate a de-democratization movement underway in the government of President Jair Messias Bolsonaro. It is understood that Brazilian democracy does not only take place through the representative model, but also through the participatory model (networks of trust). Participation institutions cannot be excluded from political processes and public action, due to administrative rationalization and resource savings, as the current President argues.El objetivo de este ensayo teórico fue analizar la relación entre la participación social y la democracia brasileña en los últimos años. Considerando que la democracia brasileña está en crisis, la pregunta es: “¿Cuáles son las repercusiones que tal escenario trae para la democracia participativa y, más profundamente, para las instituciones de participación?”. El ensayo se benefició de un levantamiento bibliográfico y de una investigación documental, analizando casos antagónicos en los que se entendió la agenda de participación social: el Decreto N° 8.243, de 2014, que fortaleció y articuló los mecanismos e instancias democráticas durante el gobierno de la entonces Presidenta Dilma Rousseff; y el Decreto N° 9.759, de 2019, que limitó y extinguió los órganos colegiados, del actual presidente Jair Messias Bolsonaro. De acuerdo con el marco analítico-conceptual de Charles Tilly, parece que las repercusiones del Decreto Nº 9.759, de 2019, comprenden escenarios que anteceden e indican un movimiento de desdemocratización en marcha en el gobierno del presidente Jair Messias Bolsonaro. Se entiende que la democracia brasileña no pasa sólo por el modelo representativo, sino también por el modelo participativo (redes de confianza). Las instituciones de participación no pueden ser excluidas de los procesos políticos y de la acción pública, por razones de racionalización administrativa y ahorro de recursos, como argumenta el actual Presidente.Objetivou-se com este ensaio teórico analisar a relação da participação social com a democracia brasileira nos últimos anos. Considerando que a democracia brasileira está em crise, questiona-se: “Quais as repercussões que tal cenário traz para a democracia participativa e, mais a fundo, para as instituições de participação?”. O ensaio se beneficiou de levantamento bibliográfico e pesquisa documental, sendo analisados casos antagônicos em que a agenda da participação social esteve compreendida: o Decreto Nº 8.243, de 2014, que fortalecia e articulava os mecanismos e as instâncias democráticas, durante o governo da então Presidenta Dilma Rousseff; e o Decreto Nº 9.759, de 2019, que limitou e extinguiu colegiados, do atual Presidente Jair Messias Bolsonaro. Mediante o marco analítico-conceitual de Charles Tilly verifica-se que as repercussões do Decreto Nº 9.759, de 2019, compreendem cenários que antecedem e indicam movimento de desdemocratização em andamento no governo do Presidente Jair Messias Bolsonaro. Entenda-se que a democracia brasileira não se dá apenas mediante o modelo representativo, mas também pelo modelo participativo (redes de confiança). As instituições de participação não podem ser excluídas dos processos políticos e da ação pública, em razão de racionalização administrativa e economia de recursos, como argumenta o atual Presidente.Research, Society and Development2022-04-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2853410.33448/rsd-v11i5.28534Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 5; e48911528534Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 5; e48911528534Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 5; e489115285342525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28534/24774Copyright (c) 2022 Francisco Lucas de Lima Fontes; Monique Menezes; Leopoldina Lavor; Izabelle Carvalho Lima; Ludmilla Soares Lima; Enedina Gizeli Albano Moura; Maria Laís Alves de Araujohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFontes, Francisco Lucas de LimaMenezes, MoniqueLavor, LeopoldinaLima, Izabelle CarvalhoLima, Ludmilla SoaresMoura, Enedina Gizeli AlbanoAraujo, Maria Laís Alves de2022-04-17T18:18:56Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28534Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:45:53.870488Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv From participatory democracy to de-democratization in Brazil: institutions of participation in crisis
De la democracia participativa a la des-democratización en Brasil: instituciones de participación en crisis
Da democracia participativa à desdemocratização no Brasil: instituições de participação em crise
title From participatory democracy to de-democratization in Brazil: institutions of participation in crisis
spellingShingle From participatory democracy to de-democratization in Brazil: institutions of participation in crisis
Fontes, Francisco Lucas de Lima
Participatory democracy
Social participation
Institutions of participation
De-democratization.
Democracia participativa
Participación social
Instituciones de participación
Des-democratización.
Democracia participativa
Participação social
Instituições de participação
Desdemocratização.
title_short From participatory democracy to de-democratization in Brazil: institutions of participation in crisis
title_full From participatory democracy to de-democratization in Brazil: institutions of participation in crisis
title_fullStr From participatory democracy to de-democratization in Brazil: institutions of participation in crisis
title_full_unstemmed From participatory democracy to de-democratization in Brazil: institutions of participation in crisis
title_sort From participatory democracy to de-democratization in Brazil: institutions of participation in crisis
author Fontes, Francisco Lucas de Lima
author_facet Fontes, Francisco Lucas de Lima
Menezes, Monique
Lavor, Leopoldina
Lima, Izabelle Carvalho
Lima, Ludmilla Soares
Moura, Enedina Gizeli Albano
Araujo, Maria Laís Alves de
author_role author
author2 Menezes, Monique
Lavor, Leopoldina
Lima, Izabelle Carvalho
Lima, Ludmilla Soares
Moura, Enedina Gizeli Albano
Araujo, Maria Laís Alves de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fontes, Francisco Lucas de Lima
Menezes, Monique
Lavor, Leopoldina
Lima, Izabelle Carvalho
Lima, Ludmilla Soares
Moura, Enedina Gizeli Albano
Araujo, Maria Laís Alves de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Participatory democracy
Social participation
Institutions of participation
De-democratization.
Democracia participativa
Participación social
Instituciones de participación
Des-democratización.
Democracia participativa
Participação social
Instituições de participação
Desdemocratização.
topic Participatory democracy
Social participation
Institutions of participation
De-democratization.
Democracia participativa
Participación social
Instituciones de participación
Des-democratización.
Democracia participativa
Participação social
Instituições de participação
Desdemocratização.
description The objective of this theoretical essay was to analyze the relationship between social participation and Brazilian democracy in recent years. Considering that Brazilian democracy is in crisis, the question is: “What are the repercussions that such a scenario brings to participatory democracy and, more deeply, to institutions of participation?”. The essay benefited from a bibliographic survey and documental research, analyzing antagonistic cases in which the social participation agenda was understood: Decree Nº. 8.243, of 2014, which strengthened and articulated democratic mechanisms and instances during the government of then President Dilma Rousseff; and Decree Nº 9.759, of 2019, which limited and extinguished collegiate bodies, of the current President Jair Messias Bolsonaro. Through the analytical-conceptual framework of Charles Tilly, it is verified that the repercussions of the Decree Nº 9.759, of 2019, comprise scenarios that precede and indicate a de-democratization movement underway in the government of President Jair Messias Bolsonaro. It is understood that Brazilian democracy does not only take place through the representative model, but also through the participatory model (networks of trust). Participation institutions cannot be excluded from political processes and public action, due to administrative rationalization and resource savings, as the current President argues.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28534
10.33448/rsd-v11i5.28534
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28534
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i5.28534
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28534/24774
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 5; e48911528534
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 5; e48911528534
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 5; e48911528534
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052794624016384

Registros relacionados