Conventionality control as an instrument for interjurisdicional dialogue of national courts with the inter-american court of human rights

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Oliveira, Alex Gaspar
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Arruda, Paula Benassuly
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/11567
Resumo: This article intends to analyze the theme of Conventionality Control as an instrument of dialogue between national courts and the Inter-American Human Rights System. To achieve this purpose, it aims to demonstrate what are the main obstacles to the implementation of the Conventionality Control in the decisions of national courts. As a methodology proceeded a bibliographic research of deductive character, where it will analyze the theoretical assumptions of Max Abbot, identifying his arguments in the two emblematic decisions used as parameters of the present article: the decision of the Raposa Serra do Sol Case and the decision of the Moradia Tradicional Caiçara Case. As results and conclusions this research will present the two paths presented by the Brazilian judiciary that represent a small indication of how the Brazilian Courts has been exercising this dialogue with the Inter-American System
id UNIJ-1_11becc6c86be7e3dcc552b588715fc2f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/11567
network_acronym_str UNIJ-1
network_name_str Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
repository_id_str
spelling Conventionality control as an instrument for interjurisdicional dialogue of national courts with the inter-american court of human rightsO controle de convencionalidade como instrumento de diálogo interjurisdicional das cortes nacionais com a corte interamericana de direitos humanosControle de Convencionalidade, diálogo interjurisdicional, Raposa Serra do Sol, Moradia CaiçaraConventionality Control, Interjurisdictional Dialogue, Raposa Serra do Sol, Caiçara HouseThis article intends to analyze the theme of Conventionality Control as an instrument of dialogue between national courts and the Inter-American Human Rights System. To achieve this purpose, it aims to demonstrate what are the main obstacles to the implementation of the Conventionality Control in the decisions of national courts. As a methodology proceeded a bibliographic research of deductive character, where it will analyze the theoretical assumptions of Max Abbot, identifying his arguments in the two emblematic decisions used as parameters of the present article: the decision of the Raposa Serra do Sol Case and the decision of the Moradia Tradicional Caiçara Case. As results and conclusions this research will present the two paths presented by the Brazilian judiciary that represent a small indication of how the Brazilian Courts has been exercising this dialogue with the Inter-American SystemEste artigo pretende analisar o tema Controle de Convencionalidade como o instrumento de diálogo entre as Cortes nacionais e o Sistema Interamericano de Direitos Humanos. Para alcançar este propósito possui como objetivo demonstrar quais os principais obstáculos para a realização do Controle de Convencionalidade nas decisões dos tribunais nacionais. Como metodologia, procedeu uma pesquisa bibliográfica de caráter dedutivo, na qual vai analisar os pressupostos teóricos de Max Abbot, identificando seus argumentos nas duas decisões emblemáticas usadas como parâmetros do presente artigo: a decisão do Caso Raposa Serra do Sol e a decisão do Caso da Moradia Tradicional de Caiçara. Como resultados e conclusões, esta pesquisa vai apresentar os dois caminhos seguidos pelo Poder Judiciário no Brasil que representam um pequeno indicativo de como as Cortes brasileiras vêm exercendo esse diálogo com o Sistema Interamericano.EDITORA UNIJUI2023-10-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/1156710.21527/2317-5389.2023.22.11567Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia; v. 11 n. 22 (2023): REVISTA DIREITOS HUMANOS E DEMOCRACIA; e115672317-5389reponame:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democraciainstname:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)instacron:UNIJUIporhttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/11567/7481Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democraciahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Oliveira, Alex GasparArruda, Paula Benassuly2023-10-10T11:18:32Zoai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/11567Revistahttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/oai2317-53892317-5389opendoar:2023-10-10T11:18:32Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia - Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Conventionality control as an instrument for interjurisdicional dialogue of national courts with the inter-american court of human rights
O controle de convencionalidade como instrumento de diálogo interjurisdicional das cortes nacionais com a corte interamericana de direitos humanos
title Conventionality control as an instrument for interjurisdicional dialogue of national courts with the inter-american court of human rights
spellingShingle Conventionality control as an instrument for interjurisdicional dialogue of national courts with the inter-american court of human rights
de Oliveira, Alex Gaspar
Controle de Convencionalidade, diálogo interjurisdicional, Raposa Serra do Sol, Moradia Caiçara
Conventionality Control, Interjurisdictional Dialogue, Raposa Serra do Sol, Caiçara House
title_short Conventionality control as an instrument for interjurisdicional dialogue of national courts with the inter-american court of human rights
title_full Conventionality control as an instrument for interjurisdicional dialogue of national courts with the inter-american court of human rights
title_fullStr Conventionality control as an instrument for interjurisdicional dialogue of national courts with the inter-american court of human rights
title_full_unstemmed Conventionality control as an instrument for interjurisdicional dialogue of national courts with the inter-american court of human rights
title_sort Conventionality control as an instrument for interjurisdicional dialogue of national courts with the inter-american court of human rights
author de Oliveira, Alex Gaspar
author_facet de Oliveira, Alex Gaspar
Arruda, Paula Benassuly
author_role author
author2 Arruda, Paula Benassuly
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Oliveira, Alex Gaspar
Arruda, Paula Benassuly
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Controle de Convencionalidade, diálogo interjurisdicional, Raposa Serra do Sol, Moradia Caiçara
Conventionality Control, Interjurisdictional Dialogue, Raposa Serra do Sol, Caiçara House
topic Controle de Convencionalidade, diálogo interjurisdicional, Raposa Serra do Sol, Moradia Caiçara
Conventionality Control, Interjurisdictional Dialogue, Raposa Serra do Sol, Caiçara House
description This article intends to analyze the theme of Conventionality Control as an instrument of dialogue between national courts and the Inter-American Human Rights System. To achieve this purpose, it aims to demonstrate what are the main obstacles to the implementation of the Conventionality Control in the decisions of national courts. As a methodology proceeded a bibliographic research of deductive character, where it will analyze the theoretical assumptions of Max Abbot, identifying his arguments in the two emblematic decisions used as parameters of the present article: the decision of the Raposa Serra do Sol Case and the decision of the Moradia Tradicional Caiçara Case. As results and conclusions this research will present the two paths presented by the Brazilian judiciary that represent a small indication of how the Brazilian Courts has been exercising this dialogue with the Inter-American System
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/11567
10.21527/2317-5389.2023.22.11567
url https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/11567
identifier_str_mv 10.21527/2317-5389.2023.22.11567
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/11567/7481
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDITORA UNIJUI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDITORA UNIJUI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia; v. 11 n. 22 (2023): REVISTA DIREITOS HUMANOS E DEMOCRACIA; e11567
2317-5389
reponame:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
instname:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)
instacron:UNIJUI
instname_str Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)
instacron_str UNIJUI
institution UNIJUI
reponame_str Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
collection Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia - Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808845054756782080

Registros relacionados