PARALELO ENTRE A TEORIA DA JUSTIÇA COMO EQUIDADE DE JOHN RAWLS E A IGUALDADE DE CAPACIDADES DE AMARTYA SEN: PARALLEL BETWEEN JOHN RAWLS’ JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS AND AMARTYA SEN’S CAPACITY EQUALITY

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tressoldi, Irenice
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Tramontina, Robison
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/12202
Resumo: John Rawls’ theory of justice as fairness represents a mark in the philosophical and political debate about the distribution of justice. In an approach that connects with the theory of justice as fairness, Amartya Sen argues that individual and collective freedoms must be prioritized over economic development. This research aims to approach the parallel existing between the theory of justice by John Rawls and Amartya Sen, based on the criticisms made by Sen about the theory formulated by Rawls. The problem inherent in this research is thus concentrated in the following terms: what are the similarities and contrasts between John Rawls' theory of justice as fairness and Amartya Sen’s justice focused on achievements? To develop the qualitative research, the deductive method is used, with an analysis of concepts and premises of the scientific literature on researched themes, through theoretical research guided by the reading of books and articles published in scientific journals. The hypothesis associated with the formulated questioning indicates that, for Sen, while a theory of justice with a transcendental approach, such as Rawls', intends to understand what it would be like perfectly just institutions, his comparison approach focused on achievements aims to find answers to the question of how justice can be promoted.
id UNIJ-1_2224af990df517afe2ca35eaa05a8295
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/12202
network_acronym_str UNIJ-1
network_name_str Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
repository_id_str
spelling PARALELO ENTRE A TEORIA DA JUSTIÇA COMO EQUIDADE DE JOHN RAWLS E A IGUALDADE DE CAPACIDADES DE AMARTYA SEN: PARALLEL BETWEEN JOHN RAWLS’ JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS AND AMARTYA SEN’S CAPACITY EQUALITYDesenvolvimento humanoDistribuição de justiçaJustiça socialJustiça como equidadeJohn Rawls’ theory of justice as fairness represents a mark in the philosophical and political debate about the distribution of justice. In an approach that connects with the theory of justice as fairness, Amartya Sen argues that individual and collective freedoms must be prioritized over economic development. This research aims to approach the parallel existing between the theory of justice by John Rawls and Amartya Sen, based on the criticisms made by Sen about the theory formulated by Rawls. The problem inherent in this research is thus concentrated in the following terms: what are the similarities and contrasts between John Rawls' theory of justice as fairness and Amartya Sen’s justice focused on achievements? To develop the qualitative research, the deductive method is used, with an analysis of concepts and premises of the scientific literature on researched themes, through theoretical research guided by the reading of books and articles published in scientific journals. The hypothesis associated with the formulated questioning indicates that, for Sen, while a theory of justice with a transcendental approach, such as Rawls', intends to understand what it would be like perfectly just institutions, his comparison approach focused on achievements aims to find answers to the question of how justice can be promoted.A teoria da justiça como equidade cunhada por John Rawls representa um marco no debate filosófico e político acerca da distribuição da justiça. Em uma abordagem que se cinge com a teoria da justiça como equidade, Amartya Sen aponta que as liberdades individuais e coletivas devem ser priorizadas em relação ao desenvolvimento econômico. Pretende-se com esta pesquisa abordar o paralelo existente entre a teoria da justiça de John Rawls e Amartya Sen, a partir das críticas feitas por Sen à teoria formulada por Rawls. O problema imanente à pesquisa concentra-se, assim, nos seguintes termos: quais as semelhanças e contraposições entre a teoria da justiça como equidade de John Rawls e a justiça focada nas realizações de Amartya Sen? Para desenvolver a pesquisa qualitativa, utiliza-se o método dedutivo, com a análise de conceitos e premissas da literatura científica acerca dos temas pesquisados, mediante pesquisa teórica orientada pela leitura de livros e de artigos publicados em revistas científicas. A hipótese associada ao questionamento formulado indica que, para Sen, enquanto uma teoria da justiça de abordagem transcendental, como é a de Rawls, pretende entender o que seriam as instituições perfeitamente justas, a sua abordagem de comparação focada em realizações quer encontrar respostas para a questão de como a justiça pode ser promovida.EDITORA UNIJUI2021-12-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/1220210.21527/2317-5389.2021.18.12202Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia; v. 9 n. 18 (2021): REVISTA DIREITOS HUMANOS E DEMOCRACIA; 208-2232317-5389reponame:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democraciainstname:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)instacron:UNIJUIporhttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/12202/6880Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democraciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTressoldi, IreniceTramontina, Robison2021-12-27T18:01:44Zoai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/12202Revistahttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/oai2317-53892317-5389opendoar:2021-12-27T18:01:44Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia - Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PARALELO ENTRE A TEORIA DA JUSTIÇA COMO EQUIDADE DE JOHN RAWLS E A IGUALDADE DE CAPACIDADES DE AMARTYA SEN: PARALLEL BETWEEN JOHN RAWLS’ JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS AND AMARTYA SEN’S CAPACITY EQUALITY
title PARALELO ENTRE A TEORIA DA JUSTIÇA COMO EQUIDADE DE JOHN RAWLS E A IGUALDADE DE CAPACIDADES DE AMARTYA SEN: PARALLEL BETWEEN JOHN RAWLS’ JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS AND AMARTYA SEN’S CAPACITY EQUALITY
spellingShingle PARALELO ENTRE A TEORIA DA JUSTIÇA COMO EQUIDADE DE JOHN RAWLS E A IGUALDADE DE CAPACIDADES DE AMARTYA SEN: PARALLEL BETWEEN JOHN RAWLS’ JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS AND AMARTYA SEN’S CAPACITY EQUALITY
Tressoldi, Irenice
Desenvolvimento humano
Distribuição de justiça
Justiça social
Justiça como equidade
title_short PARALELO ENTRE A TEORIA DA JUSTIÇA COMO EQUIDADE DE JOHN RAWLS E A IGUALDADE DE CAPACIDADES DE AMARTYA SEN: PARALLEL BETWEEN JOHN RAWLS’ JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS AND AMARTYA SEN’S CAPACITY EQUALITY
title_full PARALELO ENTRE A TEORIA DA JUSTIÇA COMO EQUIDADE DE JOHN RAWLS E A IGUALDADE DE CAPACIDADES DE AMARTYA SEN: PARALLEL BETWEEN JOHN RAWLS’ JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS AND AMARTYA SEN’S CAPACITY EQUALITY
title_fullStr PARALELO ENTRE A TEORIA DA JUSTIÇA COMO EQUIDADE DE JOHN RAWLS E A IGUALDADE DE CAPACIDADES DE AMARTYA SEN: PARALLEL BETWEEN JOHN RAWLS’ JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS AND AMARTYA SEN’S CAPACITY EQUALITY
title_full_unstemmed PARALELO ENTRE A TEORIA DA JUSTIÇA COMO EQUIDADE DE JOHN RAWLS E A IGUALDADE DE CAPACIDADES DE AMARTYA SEN: PARALLEL BETWEEN JOHN RAWLS’ JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS AND AMARTYA SEN’S CAPACITY EQUALITY
title_sort PARALELO ENTRE A TEORIA DA JUSTIÇA COMO EQUIDADE DE JOHN RAWLS E A IGUALDADE DE CAPACIDADES DE AMARTYA SEN: PARALLEL BETWEEN JOHN RAWLS’ JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS AND AMARTYA SEN’S CAPACITY EQUALITY
author Tressoldi, Irenice
author_facet Tressoldi, Irenice
Tramontina, Robison
author_role author
author2 Tramontina, Robison
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tressoldi, Irenice
Tramontina, Robison
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Desenvolvimento humano
Distribuição de justiça
Justiça social
Justiça como equidade
topic Desenvolvimento humano
Distribuição de justiça
Justiça social
Justiça como equidade
description John Rawls’ theory of justice as fairness represents a mark in the philosophical and political debate about the distribution of justice. In an approach that connects with the theory of justice as fairness, Amartya Sen argues that individual and collective freedoms must be prioritized over economic development. This research aims to approach the parallel existing between the theory of justice by John Rawls and Amartya Sen, based on the criticisms made by Sen about the theory formulated by Rawls. The problem inherent in this research is thus concentrated in the following terms: what are the similarities and contrasts between John Rawls' theory of justice as fairness and Amartya Sen’s justice focused on achievements? To develop the qualitative research, the deductive method is used, with an analysis of concepts and premises of the scientific literature on researched themes, through theoretical research guided by the reading of books and articles published in scientific journals. The hypothesis associated with the formulated questioning indicates that, for Sen, while a theory of justice with a transcendental approach, such as Rawls', intends to understand what it would be like perfectly just institutions, his comparison approach focused on achievements aims to find answers to the question of how justice can be promoted.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/12202
10.21527/2317-5389.2021.18.12202
url https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/12202
identifier_str_mv 10.21527/2317-5389.2021.18.12202
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/12202/6880
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDITORA UNIJUI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDITORA UNIJUI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia; v. 9 n. 18 (2021): REVISTA DIREITOS HUMANOS E DEMOCRACIA; 208-223
2317-5389
reponame:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
instname:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)
instacron:UNIJUI
instname_str Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)
instacron_str UNIJUI
institution UNIJUI
reponame_str Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
collection Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia - Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808845057536557056

Registros relacionados