Pos-structuralism and the disruption of metanarratives about constitutional meaning
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/13874 |
Resumo: | This article intend to reflect on the influence of post-structuralist thinking on Law, with emphasis on disruptions of constitutional meta-narratives of judicial supremacy, justice as the only correct answer and Democracy as a political system of majorities. For this purpose, the historical-dialectical method was used, resorting to bibliographical research and secondary sources. Initially, the study analyzed post-structuralism as a movement of thought that broke with the great discourses that marked modernity and proposed new readings on social, political, economic and cultural realities. Then, it addressed how post-structuralist thought, by removing structures and systems from the center, spread knowledge in different directions and influenced constitutionalism, opening space for theories that understand the decision-making process as a dialogic, continuous and creative relationship between society and constituted powers. In sequence, he presented reflections on the disbelief in the democratic ideal, a consequence of the abyss between real and ideal democracy. Finally, it concluded that the transformation of Democracy as an unfulfilled promise, as a future, occurs from the perspective of promoting education for citizenship, sharing a plural power, with the participation of individuals from different identities and interest groups, opening spaces of discursiveness to minorized and vulnerable groups. |
id |
UNIJ-1_48998adf6f2a73a9c8db80df0222be98 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/13874 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIJ-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pos-structuralism and the disruption of metanarratives about constitutional meaningPós-estruturalismo e a disruptura das metanarrativas sobre o sentido constitucionalpost-structuralismmetanarrativespopular constitutionalismconstitutional dialoguesdemocracypós-estruturalismometanarrativasconstitucionalismo populardiálogos constitucionaisdemocraciaThis article intend to reflect on the influence of post-structuralist thinking on Law, with emphasis on disruptions of constitutional meta-narratives of judicial supremacy, justice as the only correct answer and Democracy as a political system of majorities. For this purpose, the historical-dialectical method was used, resorting to bibliographical research and secondary sources. Initially, the study analyzed post-structuralism as a movement of thought that broke with the great discourses that marked modernity and proposed new readings on social, political, economic and cultural realities. Then, it addressed how post-structuralist thought, by removing structures and systems from the center, spread knowledge in different directions and influenced constitutionalism, opening space for theories that understand the decision-making process as a dialogic, continuous and creative relationship between society and constituted powers. In sequence, he presented reflections on the disbelief in the democratic ideal, a consequence of the abyss between real and ideal democracy. Finally, it concluded that the transformation of Democracy as an unfulfilled promise, as a future, occurs from the perspective of promoting education for citizenship, sharing a plural power, with the participation of individuals from different identities and interest groups, opening spaces of discursiveness to minorized and vulnerable groups. O presente artigo tem como objetivo refletir sobre a influência do pensamento pós-estruturalista sobre o Direito, com ênfase nas disrupturas das metanarrativas constitucionais da supremacia judicial, da Justiça como única resposta correta e da democracia como sistema político das maiorias. Para tal desiderato utilizou-se o método histórico-dialético, com recurso à pesquisa bibliográfica e fontes secundárias. Inicialmente o estudo analisou o pós-estruturalismo como movimento de pensamento que rompeu com os grandes discursos que marcaram a modernidade e propôs novas leituras sobre as realidades social, política, econômica e cultural. Em seguida, abordou como o pensamento pós-estruturalista, ao retirar as estruturas e os sistemas do centro, pulverizou o conhecimento em diferentes direções e influenciou o constitucionalismo, abrindo espaço para teorias que compreendem o processo decisório como uma relação dialógica, contínua e criativa entre sociedade e poderes constituídos. Em sequência apresentou reflexões sobre a descrença no ideal democrático, consequência do abismo entre a democracia real e a ideal. Por fim, concluiu que a transformação da democracia como promessa não cumprida, como devir, ocorre a partir da perspectiva de promoção da educação para a cidadania, do compartilhamento de um poder plural, com a participação de indivíduos das diversas identidades e grupos de interesse, abrindo espaços de discursividade a grupos minorizados e vulneráveis.EDITORA UNIJUI2023-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/1387410.21527/2317-5389.2023.22.13874Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia; v. 11 n. 22 (2023): REVISTA DIREITOS HUMANOS E DEMOCRACIA; e138742317-5389reponame:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democraciainstname:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)instacron:UNIJUIporhttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/13874/7629Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democraciahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAzevedo, Rosaly Bussinguer, Elda Coelho de Azevedo2023-10-10T11:18:32Zoai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/13874Revistahttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/oai2317-53892317-5389opendoar:2023-10-10T11:18:32Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia - Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pos-structuralism and the disruption of metanarratives about constitutional meaning Pós-estruturalismo e a disruptura das metanarrativas sobre o sentido constitucional |
title |
Pos-structuralism and the disruption of metanarratives about constitutional meaning |
spellingShingle |
Pos-structuralism and the disruption of metanarratives about constitutional meaning Azevedo, Rosaly post-structuralism metanarratives popular constitutionalism constitutional dialogues democracy pós-estruturalismo metanarrativas constitucionalismo popular diálogos constitucionais democracia |
title_short |
Pos-structuralism and the disruption of metanarratives about constitutional meaning |
title_full |
Pos-structuralism and the disruption of metanarratives about constitutional meaning |
title_fullStr |
Pos-structuralism and the disruption of metanarratives about constitutional meaning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pos-structuralism and the disruption of metanarratives about constitutional meaning |
title_sort |
Pos-structuralism and the disruption of metanarratives about constitutional meaning |
author |
Azevedo, Rosaly |
author_facet |
Azevedo, Rosaly Bussinguer, Elda Coelho de Azevedo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bussinguer, Elda Coelho de Azevedo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Azevedo, Rosaly Bussinguer, Elda Coelho de Azevedo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
post-structuralism metanarratives popular constitutionalism constitutional dialogues democracy pós-estruturalismo metanarrativas constitucionalismo popular diálogos constitucionais democracia |
topic |
post-structuralism metanarratives popular constitutionalism constitutional dialogues democracy pós-estruturalismo metanarrativas constitucionalismo popular diálogos constitucionais democracia |
description |
This article intend to reflect on the influence of post-structuralist thinking on Law, with emphasis on disruptions of constitutional meta-narratives of judicial supremacy, justice as the only correct answer and Democracy as a political system of majorities. For this purpose, the historical-dialectical method was used, resorting to bibliographical research and secondary sources. Initially, the study analyzed post-structuralism as a movement of thought that broke with the great discourses that marked modernity and proposed new readings on social, political, economic and cultural realities. Then, it addressed how post-structuralist thought, by removing structures and systems from the center, spread knowledge in different directions and influenced constitutionalism, opening space for theories that understand the decision-making process as a dialogic, continuous and creative relationship between society and constituted powers. In sequence, he presented reflections on the disbelief in the democratic ideal, a consequence of the abyss between real and ideal democracy. Finally, it concluded that the transformation of Democracy as an unfulfilled promise, as a future, occurs from the perspective of promoting education for citizenship, sharing a plural power, with the participation of individuals from different identities and interest groups, opening spaces of discursiveness to minorized and vulnerable groups. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/13874 10.21527/2317-5389.2023.22.13874 |
url |
https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/13874 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21527/2317-5389.2023.22.13874 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/13874/7629 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDITORA UNIJUI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDITORA UNIJUI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia; v. 11 n. 22 (2023): REVISTA DIREITOS HUMANOS E DEMOCRACIA; e13874 2317-5389 reponame:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia instname:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI) instacron:UNIJUI |
instname_str |
Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI) |
instacron_str |
UNIJUI |
institution |
UNIJUI |
reponame_str |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia |
collection |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia - Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808845054812356608 |