Assessing pre-service teacher instructional competency: are observations enough?

• Autor(a) principal: Alexander, Melina
• Data de Publicação: 2014
• Outros Autores: Giralt, Alicia
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Revista Educação Ciência e Cultura
• Texto Completo: https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Educacao/article/view/1357
• topic: teacher preparation; observation tools; student teachers; Educação; preparação do professor; ferramentas de observação; professores-alunos

Teacher quality can positively impact student achievement (Goe, 2007). The responsibility for producing quality teachers, those that contribute to positive student outcomes, generally falls to teacher preparation programs. Teacher preparation programs seek to affect teacher quality through providing coursework in validated instructional methods designed to maximize student achievement and through fieldwork experiences. Pre-service teacher instructional ability is typically shaped throughout a teacher preparation program and refined in a capstone field experience called student teaching (NCTQ, 2011). Student teaching provides pre-service teachers with the opportunity to apply their content and pedagogical knowledge and skills in a real world setting. Pre-service teachers are often subjected to observations throughout their student teaching experience from a variety of sources including classroom teachers and teacher preparation program supervisors.  In order for pre-service teachers to obtain maximum benefit from student teaching they need to be given quality feedback on their instructional performance garnered from these classroom observations. However, this feedback is often dependent on the type of observation measurement tool used. If the observation tool provides too little or inaccurate information, the feedback to the student teacher may be ineffective (Hill, Charalambous, Kraft, 2012). The purpose of this study was to assess currently used observation tools in one teacher preparation program against these aspects, and second, to identify needed improvements in observational procedures.