The presumption of innocence in the context of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and their relativization by the Supreme Federal Court
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Diálogo |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/article/view/5164 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this written is to verify whether the provisional execution of the penalty is compatible with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and with the Federal Constitution. The study of the topic presented is important insofar as it transcends the academic debate, since it has a direct impact on the area of jus libertatis of the accused in criminal proceedings. The deductive method was used, through indirect documentary research. In the end, it was found that the novel understanding of the Federal Supreme Court, by permitting the provisional execution of the penalty, conflicts with the presumption of innocence and, as a consequence, with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Federal Constitution, for anticipating the judgement of guilt before the transit on trial of the damning criminal sentence. |
id |
UNILASALLE-5_0a4f26fdb3ea90b8434e47762c8aa557 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.unilasalle.edu.br:article/5164 |
network_acronym_str |
UNILASALLE-5 |
network_name_str |
Revista Diálogo |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The presumption of innocence in the context of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and their relativization by the Supreme Federal CourtA presunção de inocência no contexto da Declaração Universal de Direitos Humanos e a sua relativização pelo Supremo Tribunal FederalPresumption of innocenceprovisional executionincompatibilityUniversal Declaration of Human RightsFederal ConstitutionPresunção de inocênciaexecução provisóriaincompatibilidadeDeclaração Universal dos Direitos HumanosConstituição FederalThe purpose of this written is to verify whether the provisional execution of the penalty is compatible with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and with the Federal Constitution. The study of the topic presented is important insofar as it transcends the academic debate, since it has a direct impact on the area of jus libertatis of the accused in criminal proceedings. The deductive method was used, through indirect documentary research. In the end, it was found that the novel understanding of the Federal Supreme Court, by permitting the provisional execution of the penalty, conflicts with the presumption of innocence and, as a consequence, with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Federal Constitution, for anticipating the judgement of guilt before the transit on trial of the damning criminal sentence.Este escrito tem como objetivo verificar se a execução provisória da pena é compatível com a Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos e com a Constituição Federal. O estudo do tema apresentado é importante na medida em que transcende o debate acadêmico, uma vez que repercute diretamente na esfera do jus libertatis do acusado no processo penal. Utilizou-se do método dedutivo, mediante pesquisa documental indireta. Ao final, constatou-se que o novel entendimento do Supremo Tribunal Federal, ao permitir a execução provisória da pena, conflita com a presunção de inocência e, por via de consequência, com a Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos e a Constituição Federal, por antecipar o juízo da culpa antes do trânsito em julgado da sentença penal condenatória.Universidade LaSalle - Unilasalle Canoas2018-12-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/article/view/516410.18316/dialogo.v0i39.5164Diálogo; n. 39 (2018); p. 107-1172238-9024reponame:Revista Diálogoinstname:Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE)instacron:UNILASALLEporhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/article/view/5164/pdfCopyright (c) 2018 Diálogoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJohner, Marcos Afonso2023-01-04T18:36:39Zoai:ojs.revistas.unilasalle.edu.br:article/5164Revistahttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/DialogoONGhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/oairevistas@unilasalle.edu.br||dialogo@unilasalle.edu.br2238-90241519-3640opendoar:2023-01-04T18:36:39Revista Diálogo - Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The presumption of innocence in the context of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and their relativization by the Supreme Federal Court A presunção de inocência no contexto da Declaração Universal de Direitos Humanos e a sua relativização pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal |
title |
The presumption of innocence in the context of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and their relativization by the Supreme Federal Court |
spellingShingle |
The presumption of innocence in the context of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and their relativization by the Supreme Federal Court Johner, Marcos Afonso Presumption of innocence provisional execution incompatibility Universal Declaration of Human Rights Federal Constitution Presunção de inocência execução provisória incompatibilidade Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos Constituição Federal |
title_short |
The presumption of innocence in the context of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and their relativization by the Supreme Federal Court |
title_full |
The presumption of innocence in the context of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and their relativization by the Supreme Federal Court |
title_fullStr |
The presumption of innocence in the context of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and their relativization by the Supreme Federal Court |
title_full_unstemmed |
The presumption of innocence in the context of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and their relativization by the Supreme Federal Court |
title_sort |
The presumption of innocence in the context of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and their relativization by the Supreme Federal Court |
author |
Johner, Marcos Afonso |
author_facet |
Johner, Marcos Afonso |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Johner, Marcos Afonso |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Presumption of innocence provisional execution incompatibility Universal Declaration of Human Rights Federal Constitution Presunção de inocência execução provisória incompatibilidade Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos Constituição Federal |
topic |
Presumption of innocence provisional execution incompatibility Universal Declaration of Human Rights Federal Constitution Presunção de inocência execução provisória incompatibilidade Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos Constituição Federal |
description |
The purpose of this written is to verify whether the provisional execution of the penalty is compatible with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and with the Federal Constitution. The study of the topic presented is important insofar as it transcends the academic debate, since it has a direct impact on the area of jus libertatis of the accused in criminal proceedings. The deductive method was used, through indirect documentary research. In the end, it was found that the novel understanding of the Federal Supreme Court, by permitting the provisional execution of the penalty, conflicts with the presumption of innocence and, as a consequence, with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Federal Constitution, for anticipating the judgement of guilt before the transit on trial of the damning criminal sentence. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/article/view/5164 10.18316/dialogo.v0i39.5164 |
url |
https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/article/view/5164 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18316/dialogo.v0i39.5164 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/article/view/5164/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Diálogo info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Diálogo |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade LaSalle - Unilasalle Canoas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade LaSalle - Unilasalle Canoas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Diálogo; n. 39 (2018); p. 107-117 2238-9024 reponame:Revista Diálogo instname:Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE) instacron:UNILASALLE |
instname_str |
Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE) |
instacron_str |
UNILASALLE |
institution |
UNILASALLE |
reponame_str |
Revista Diálogo |
collection |
Revista Diálogo |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Diálogo - Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistas@unilasalle.edu.br||dialogo@unilasalle.edu.br |
_version_ |
1800217362264227840 |