SENSORY EVALUATION OF PATTIES WITH INULIN AS FAT REPLACEMENT BY SURFACE RESPONSE METHODOLOGY

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Los, Paulo Ricardo
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: SALEM, RENATA DINNIES SANTOS, Forlani Crepaldi, Arthur, Villa Amaral, Guilherme, Silva Simões, Deise Rosana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: UNINGÁ Review
Texto Completo: https://revista.uninga.br/uningareviews/article/view/3735
Resumo: Meat products with reduced fat content are a tendency in food industry, and regarding that, fat replacements have been utilized. The suggestion using them is the manufacturing of re- duced fat products that can be considered healthy and prefera- ble maintaining original sensory characteristics. The intent of this work is elaborate beef hamburger patties utilizing inulin as fat replacement, containing prebiotic functions. For that nine formulations were developed, which three were classified as base-formulations, varying the inulin and fat content. The products were characterized by physicochemical analysis (moisture, protein, lipid, ashes and total fibers), cooking shrinkage and sensory regarding acceptability for overall im- pression, appearance, flavor, odor, texture and after flavor. Through response surface methodology applied to sensory data, the attributes flavor, odor, appearance and after flavor were the ones that obtained better fit to the data and were utilized to predict the better proportion of fat and inulin. The results obtained demonstrated that the 6% inulin formulation obtained the better acceptability compared to traditional patty Formulations containing more than 6% inulin presented low acceptability, due to the low content of meat, negatively influencing the final product texture and flavor.
id UNINGA-2_39ea3f35a675cd45d5f14507086bed38
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.uninga.br:article/3735
network_acronym_str UNINGA-2
network_name_str UNINGÁ Review
repository_id_str
spelling SENSORY EVALUATION OF PATTIES WITH INULIN AS FAT REPLACEMENT BY SURFACE RESPONSE METHODOLOGYAVALIAÇÃO SENSORIAL DE HAMBÚRGUER COM SUBSTITUIÇÃO DE GORDURA POR INULINA ATRAVÉS DE METODOLOGIA DE SUPERFÍCIE DE RESPOSTACarneNutriçãoFibraAceitalibilidadeMeatNutritionFiberAceptabilityMeat products with reduced fat content are a tendency in food industry, and regarding that, fat replacements have been utilized. The suggestion using them is the manufacturing of re- duced fat products that can be considered healthy and prefera- ble maintaining original sensory characteristics. The intent of this work is elaborate beef hamburger patties utilizing inulin as fat replacement, containing prebiotic functions. For that nine formulations were developed, which three were classified as base-formulations, varying the inulin and fat content. The products were characterized by physicochemical analysis (moisture, protein, lipid, ashes and total fibers), cooking shrinkage and sensory regarding acceptability for overall im- pression, appearance, flavor, odor, texture and after flavor. Through response surface methodology applied to sensory data, the attributes flavor, odor, appearance and after flavor were the ones that obtained better fit to the data and were utilized to predict the better proportion of fat and inulin. The results obtained demonstrated that the 6% inulin formulation obtained the better acceptability compared to traditional patty Formulations containing more than 6% inulin presented low acceptability, due to the low content of meat, negatively influencing the final product texture and flavor.Produtos cárneos com teor reduzido de gordura são uma tendência na indústria de alimentos e, para isto, substitutos de gordura estão sendo utilizados. A proposta em empre- gá-los é a obtenção de produtos com teor reduzido de gor- dura que possam ser considerados saudáveis e que prefe- rencialmente mantenham as características sensoriais originais. O objetivo deste trabalho foi elaborar hambúrgue- res de carne bovina utilizando como substituto de gordura a fibra inulina, que contém funções prebióticas. Para isto foram desenvolvidas nove formulações, onde três foram classificadas como formulações-base, variando nelas o per- centual de gordura e inulina. Os produtos foram caracte- rizados por análises físico-químicas (umidade, proteína, lipídios, cinzas e fibras totais), rendimento de encolhimento e sensorialmente quanto a aceitabilidade para a sua im- pressão global, aparência, sabor, odor/aroma, maciez e sabor residual. Através da metodologia de superfície de resposta aplicada aos dados sensorial obtidos, os atributos sabor (R²= 0,743), odor (R²=0,775), aparência (R²=0,736) e sabor residual (R²=0,80), foram os que obtiveram melhor ajuste aos dados. Os resultados obtidos demonstraram que a formulação com 6% de inulina obteve a melhor aceitabilidade (p<0,05). Formulações contendo grade quantidade de inulina apresentaram baixa aceitação, devido principalmente ao teor reduzido de carne, que influenciou de forma negativa a textura e o sabor do produto.Editora Uningá2020-10-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.uninga.br/uningareviews/article/view/3735Uningá Review ; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2016): REVISTA UNINGÁ REVIEW; 30-35Uningá Review Journal; v. 26 n. 1 (2016): REVISTA UNINGÁ REVIEW; 30-352178-2571reponame:UNINGÁ Reviewinstname:Centro Universitário Uningáinstacron:UNINGAporhttps://revista.uninga.br/uningareviews/article/view/3735/2236Los, Paulo RicardoSALEM, RENATA DINNIES SANTOSForlani Crepaldi, ArthurVilla Amaral, GuilhermeSilva Simões, Deise Rosanainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-10-19T14:37:55Zoai:ojs.revista.uninga.br:article/3735Revistahttps://revista.uninga.br/uningareviews/indexPUBhttps://revista.uninga.br/uningareviews/oairevistauningareview@uninga.edu.br || sec.revistas@uninga.edu.br2178-25712178-2571opendoar:2020-10-19T14:37:55UNINGÁ Review - Centro Universitário Uningáfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv SENSORY EVALUATION OF PATTIES WITH INULIN AS FAT REPLACEMENT BY SURFACE RESPONSE METHODOLOGY
AVALIAÇÃO SENSORIAL DE HAMBÚRGUER COM SUBSTITUIÇÃO DE GORDURA POR INULINA ATRAVÉS DE METODOLOGIA DE SUPERFÍCIE DE RESPOSTA
title SENSORY EVALUATION OF PATTIES WITH INULIN AS FAT REPLACEMENT BY SURFACE RESPONSE METHODOLOGY
spellingShingle SENSORY EVALUATION OF PATTIES WITH INULIN AS FAT REPLACEMENT BY SURFACE RESPONSE METHODOLOGY
Los, Paulo Ricardo
Carne
Nutrição
Fibra
Aceitalibilidade
Meat
Nutrition
Fiber
Aceptability
title_short SENSORY EVALUATION OF PATTIES WITH INULIN AS FAT REPLACEMENT BY SURFACE RESPONSE METHODOLOGY
title_full SENSORY EVALUATION OF PATTIES WITH INULIN AS FAT REPLACEMENT BY SURFACE RESPONSE METHODOLOGY
title_fullStr SENSORY EVALUATION OF PATTIES WITH INULIN AS FAT REPLACEMENT BY SURFACE RESPONSE METHODOLOGY
title_full_unstemmed SENSORY EVALUATION OF PATTIES WITH INULIN AS FAT REPLACEMENT BY SURFACE RESPONSE METHODOLOGY
title_sort SENSORY EVALUATION OF PATTIES WITH INULIN AS FAT REPLACEMENT BY SURFACE RESPONSE METHODOLOGY
author Los, Paulo Ricardo
author_facet Los, Paulo Ricardo
SALEM, RENATA DINNIES SANTOS
Forlani Crepaldi, Arthur
Villa Amaral, Guilherme
Silva Simões, Deise Rosana
author_role author
author2 SALEM, RENATA DINNIES SANTOS
Forlani Crepaldi, Arthur
Villa Amaral, Guilherme
Silva Simões, Deise Rosana
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Los, Paulo Ricardo
SALEM, RENATA DINNIES SANTOS
Forlani Crepaldi, Arthur
Villa Amaral, Guilherme
Silva Simões, Deise Rosana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Carne
Nutrição
Fibra
Aceitalibilidade
Meat
Nutrition
Fiber
Aceptability
topic Carne
Nutrição
Fibra
Aceitalibilidade
Meat
Nutrition
Fiber
Aceptability
description Meat products with reduced fat content are a tendency in food industry, and regarding that, fat replacements have been utilized. The suggestion using them is the manufacturing of re- duced fat products that can be considered healthy and prefera- ble maintaining original sensory characteristics. The intent of this work is elaborate beef hamburger patties utilizing inulin as fat replacement, containing prebiotic functions. For that nine formulations were developed, which three were classified as base-formulations, varying the inulin and fat content. The products were characterized by physicochemical analysis (moisture, protein, lipid, ashes and total fibers), cooking shrinkage and sensory regarding acceptability for overall im- pression, appearance, flavor, odor, texture and after flavor. Through response surface methodology applied to sensory data, the attributes flavor, odor, appearance and after flavor were the ones that obtained better fit to the data and were utilized to predict the better proportion of fat and inulin. The results obtained demonstrated that the 6% inulin formulation obtained the better acceptability compared to traditional patty Formulations containing more than 6% inulin presented low acceptability, due to the low content of meat, negatively influencing the final product texture and flavor.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.uninga.br/uningareviews/article/view/3735
url https://revista.uninga.br/uningareviews/article/view/3735
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.uninga.br/uningareviews/article/view/3735/2236
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Uningá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Uningá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Uningá Review ; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2016): REVISTA UNINGÁ REVIEW; 30-35
Uningá Review Journal; v. 26 n. 1 (2016): REVISTA UNINGÁ REVIEW; 30-35
2178-2571
reponame:UNINGÁ Review
instname:Centro Universitário Uningá
instacron:UNINGA
instname_str Centro Universitário Uningá
instacron_str UNINGA
institution UNINGA
reponame_str UNINGÁ Review
collection UNINGÁ Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv UNINGÁ Review - Centro Universitário Uningá
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistauningareview@uninga.edu.br || sec.revistas@uninga.edu.br
_version_ 1797042215362494464