Homoafetive union and human dignity in the federal public service: leading case in The Labor Court of the 19th Region
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Thesis Juris |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/10852 |
Resumo: | The article analyzes the legal treatment of homosexual public servants in Brazil, the cut between the beginning of the new millennium and the emblematic decision of November 2011, in the Federal Supreme Court, arising from a process that discussed the civil union between homosexual persons and his relationship with the State of Rio de Janeiro as an employer. The research was done within the scope of the Federal Judiciary as an employer / public administrator and, as a case study, the documentary analysis of process 000900-76.5.19.2008.0000, which was processed before the Regional Labor Court of the 19th Region, in which it was discussed, for the first time, about the homoafetive union of federal judicial servant and the equation to the hetero-affective union for the purpose of enjoyment of the benefits related to health and social security plan. The research sought to reveal how the concepts of human dignity, equality and non-discrimination, and the maxim of the effectiveness of fundamental rights were seen by the Public Administration in dealing with their homosexually administered servants. |
id |
UNINOVE-2_92705787977809cf9a38883fc25c1d2e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/10852 |
network_acronym_str |
UNINOVE-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Thesis Juris |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Homoafetive union and human dignity in the federal public service: leading case in The Labor Court of the 19th RegionUnião homoafetiva e dignidade humana no serviço público federal: leading case no Tribunal Regional do Trabalho da 19ª RegiãoHomoafetive unionEqualizationHuman dignity.União homoafetivaEquiparaçãoHeteroafetividadeLegalidadeDignidade humana.The article analyzes the legal treatment of homosexual public servants in Brazil, the cut between the beginning of the new millennium and the emblematic decision of November 2011, in the Federal Supreme Court, arising from a process that discussed the civil union between homosexual persons and his relationship with the State of Rio de Janeiro as an employer. The research was done within the scope of the Federal Judiciary as an employer / public administrator and, as a case study, the documentary analysis of process 000900-76.5.19.2008.0000, which was processed before the Regional Labor Court of the 19th Region, in which it was discussed, for the first time, about the homoafetive union of federal judicial servant and the equation to the hetero-affective union for the purpose of enjoyment of the benefits related to health and social security plan. The research sought to reveal how the concepts of human dignity, equality and non-discrimination, and the maxim of the effectiveness of fundamental rights were seen by the Public Administration in dealing with their homosexually administered servants.O artigo analisa o tratamento jurídico dirigido aos servidores públicos homossexuais no Brasil, no recorte entre o início do novo milênio e a decisão emblemática de novembro de 2011, no Supremo Tribunal Federal, oriunda de processo que discutiu a união civil entre pessoas homossexuais e sua relação com o Estado do Rio de Janeiro como empregador. A pesquisa foi feita no âmbito do Poder Judiciário federal enquanto empregador/administrador público, e se vale, como estudo de caso, da análise documental do processo 000900-76.5.19.2008.0000, que tramitou perante o Tribunal Regional do Trabalho da 19ª Região, no qual se discutiu, pela primeira vez, acerca da união homoafetiva de servidor do judiciário federal e a equiparação à união heteroafetiva para fins de gozo dos benefícios relativos a plano de saúde e previdenciários. A pesquisa procurou revelar como os conceitos de dignidade da pessoa humana, igualdade e não-discriminação e da máxima da efetividade dos direitos fundamentais eram vistos pela Administração Pública no trato com seus administrados-servidores de orientação homossexual.Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove2020-01-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/1085210.5585/rtj.v8i2.10852Revista Thesis Juris; v. 8 n. 2 (2019): (jul./dez.); 164-1842317-3580reponame:Revista Thesis Jurisinstname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEporhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/10852/pdfCopyright (c) 2020 Revista Thesis Jurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMorais, Márcio Eduardo Senra Nogueira PedrosaSantos, André Luiz Ferreira2021-02-12T19:21:31Zoai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/10852Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjurisPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/oaithesis@uninove.br2317-35802317-3580opendoar:2021-02-12T19:21:31Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Homoafetive union and human dignity in the federal public service: leading case in The Labor Court of the 19th Region União homoafetiva e dignidade humana no serviço público federal: leading case no Tribunal Regional do Trabalho da 19ª Região |
title |
Homoafetive union and human dignity in the federal public service: leading case in The Labor Court of the 19th Region |
spellingShingle |
Homoafetive union and human dignity in the federal public service: leading case in The Labor Court of the 19th Region Morais, Márcio Eduardo Senra Nogueira Pedrosa Homoafetive union Equalization Human dignity. União homoafetiva Equiparação Heteroafetividade Legalidade Dignidade humana. |
title_short |
Homoafetive union and human dignity in the federal public service: leading case in The Labor Court of the 19th Region |
title_full |
Homoafetive union and human dignity in the federal public service: leading case in The Labor Court of the 19th Region |
title_fullStr |
Homoafetive union and human dignity in the federal public service: leading case in The Labor Court of the 19th Region |
title_full_unstemmed |
Homoafetive union and human dignity in the federal public service: leading case in The Labor Court of the 19th Region |
title_sort |
Homoafetive union and human dignity in the federal public service: leading case in The Labor Court of the 19th Region |
author |
Morais, Márcio Eduardo Senra Nogueira Pedrosa |
author_facet |
Morais, Márcio Eduardo Senra Nogueira Pedrosa Santos, André Luiz Ferreira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos, André Luiz Ferreira |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Morais, Márcio Eduardo Senra Nogueira Pedrosa Santos, André Luiz Ferreira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Homoafetive union Equalization Human dignity. União homoafetiva Equiparação Heteroafetividade Legalidade Dignidade humana. |
topic |
Homoafetive union Equalization Human dignity. União homoafetiva Equiparação Heteroafetividade Legalidade Dignidade humana. |
description |
The article analyzes the legal treatment of homosexual public servants in Brazil, the cut between the beginning of the new millennium and the emblematic decision of November 2011, in the Federal Supreme Court, arising from a process that discussed the civil union between homosexual persons and his relationship with the State of Rio de Janeiro as an employer. The research was done within the scope of the Federal Judiciary as an employer / public administrator and, as a case study, the documentary analysis of process 000900-76.5.19.2008.0000, which was processed before the Regional Labor Court of the 19th Region, in which it was discussed, for the first time, about the homoafetive union of federal judicial servant and the equation to the hetero-affective union for the purpose of enjoyment of the benefits related to health and social security plan. The research sought to reveal how the concepts of human dignity, equality and non-discrimination, and the maxim of the effectiveness of fundamental rights were seen by the Public Administration in dealing with their homosexually administered servants. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/10852 10.5585/rtj.v8i2.10852 |
url |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/10852 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5585/rtj.v8i2.10852 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/10852/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Thesis Juris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Thesis Juris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Thesis Juris; v. 8 n. 2 (2019): (jul./dez.); 164-184 2317-3580 reponame:Revista Thesis Juris instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) instacron:UNINOVE |
instname_str |
Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
instacron_str |
UNINOVE |
institution |
UNINOVE |
reponame_str |
Revista Thesis Juris |
collection |
Revista Thesis Juris |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
thesis@uninove.br |
_version_ |
1800218169280823296 |