Millôr Fernandes e a Nova República: uma relação interdiscursiva

• Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Pamera Francieli Corrêa
• Data de Publicação: 2019
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
• Texto Completo: http://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/4696
• topic: Millôr; Nova República; Interdiscurso; CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO

This dissertation aims to analyze the discursive materiality of Millôr Fernandes about the New Republic (1985 - 1990), considering the interdiscursive relationship present in the author subject‟s statement. The corpus clipping comprises the selection of 7 cartoons listed for the practice of analysis based on the French Speech Theory; besides sources such as Michel Foucault, Eni Orlandi and Ruth Amossy, among others, which should theoretically support the research, as well as the conditions of production of the corpus. From the perspective of Discourse Theory, which consists in observing the subject, the discursive materiality and the historicity in the intermingling with the discourse as a manifestation of symbolization of the human, is that this undertaking takes effect. The objectives that guide this investigation boil down to making known the interdiscursive relationship in Millôr's saying, regarding the recovery of other words; understand that Millôr spokesman for a discourse that transposes in the bias of humor about the politics of the New Republic (1985 - 1990); as well as making analogous points regarding a past and present policy. Under the exercise of discursive retakes, interdiscourse is the concept mobilized for the analysis of cartoons elected to the corpus which, in line with the conditions of production, makes it possible to evoke sense effects from each discursive materiality and each caricatured image analyzed as Spokesperson for a speech. Moreover, it allows the perception about the effects of meanings of Millôr's discourse that give rise to criticism of New Republic politics (1985 - 1990), highlighting its ideological crossings and its inscription in the discursive formation of counter-identification in relation to the political making of the Sarney Government. . Finally, what justifies the theme of this work is the cadence of Millôr's saying about the accuracy of the subject that involves politics, and for considering that it rules and rules over society