Governance in the handmade cachaça chain: the case of Alambiques Gaúchos
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Informe Gepec (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/gepec/article/view/5060 |
Resumo: | Initiatives focusing on improving quality and product presentation have made Rio Grande do Sul stand out on handmade cachaça. This is because the creation, in 2005, the project called Alambiques Gaúchos, composed by 14 companies and with the aim of improving the perception of the market that Rio Grande do Sul offers good handmade cachaça. Besides the factors that have influence in its institutional and organizational environment because of its historical process, from 2010, the group faces other challenges, as the end of the project that used to keep it financially and internal conflicts that were the reason for some members give up. Thus, based on the Induction Scheme of the Forms of Governance included in the New Institutional Economics Theory (NIE), it aimed to understand the factors that influenced the transactions of the group, identifying its governance structure and what are its mechanisms for coordination. The Comparative Structural Analysis Discrete concluded that the governance structure that could be adopted by the group, would be hybrid, however, there is no coordination. It makes not possible a larger organization the members, prejudicing the development of their activities. |
id |
UNIOESTE-5_15cf01114b7bf7ba418b87206439fcc4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/5060 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIOESTE-5 |
network_name_str |
Informe Gepec (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Governance in the handmade cachaça chain: the case of Alambiques GaúchosGovernança na Cadeia da Cachaça Artesanal: O Caso do Grupo Alambiques GaúchosAlambiques GaúchosCachaça artesanalNEIEsquema da Indução das Formas de Governança.Initiatives focusing on improving quality and product presentation have made Rio Grande do Sul stand out on handmade cachaça. This is because the creation, in 2005, the project called Alambiques Gaúchos, composed by 14 companies and with the aim of improving the perception of the market that Rio Grande do Sul offers good handmade cachaça. Besides the factors that have influence in its institutional and organizational environment because of its historical process, from 2010, the group faces other challenges, as the end of the project that used to keep it financially and internal conflicts that were the reason for some members give up. Thus, based on the Induction Scheme of the Forms of Governance included in the New Institutional Economics Theory (NIE), it aimed to understand the factors that influenced the transactions of the group, identifying its governance structure and what are its mechanisms for coordination. The Comparative Structural Analysis Discrete concluded that the governance structure that could be adopted by the group, would be hybrid, however, there is no coordination. It makes not possible a larger organization the members, prejudicing the development of their activities.Iniciativas focando a melhoria da qualidade e a apresentação dos produtos tem feito o estado do Rio Grande do Sul se destacar no cenário da cachaça artesanal. Esse diferencial decorre da criação, em 2005, do projeto chamado Alambiques Gaúchos, composto por 14 empresas e com o objetivo de fortalecer a percepção do mercado consumidor de que o estado oferece cachaças artesanais de qualidade. Além dos fatores que influenciam o seu ambiente institucional e organizacional decorrentes do seu processo histórico, a partir do ano de 2010, o grupo enfrenta outros desafios, como o fim do projeto que o mantinha financeiramente e conflitos internos que ocasionaram a saída de associados. Assim, baseado no Esquema da Indução das Formas de Governança contemplado na teoria Nova Economia Institucional (NEI), buscou-se compreender o encadeamento dos fatores influenciadores das transações do grupo Alambiques Gaúchos, identificando a sua estrutura de governança e quais os seus mecanismos de coordenação. A Análise Estrutural Discreta Comparada permitiu concluir que a estrutura de governança que poderia ser adotada pelo grupo seria a do tipo híbrida, no entanto, não há coordenação, impossibilitando uma maior organização dos alambiques integrantes e prejudicando o desenvolvimento de suas atividades.EdUnioeste2012-05-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/gepec/article/view/506010.48075/igepec.v16i1.5060Informe GEPEC; v. 16 n. 1 (2012); 93-1111679-415X1676-067010.48075/igepec.v16i1reponame:Informe Gepec (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)instacron:UNIOESTEporhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/gepec/article/view/5060/5099Scarton, Luciana MariaWaquil, Paulo Dabdabinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-05-16T22:13:45Zoai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/5060Revistahttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/gepecPUBhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/gepec/oairevista.gepec@gmail.com1679-415X1676-0670opendoar:2023-05-16T22:13:45Informe Gepec (Online) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Governance in the handmade cachaça chain: the case of Alambiques Gaúchos Governança na Cadeia da Cachaça Artesanal: O Caso do Grupo Alambiques Gaúchos |
title |
Governance in the handmade cachaça chain: the case of Alambiques Gaúchos |
spellingShingle |
Governance in the handmade cachaça chain: the case of Alambiques Gaúchos Scarton, Luciana Maria Alambiques Gaúchos Cachaça artesanal NEI Esquema da Indução das Formas de Governança. |
title_short |
Governance in the handmade cachaça chain: the case of Alambiques Gaúchos |
title_full |
Governance in the handmade cachaça chain: the case of Alambiques Gaúchos |
title_fullStr |
Governance in the handmade cachaça chain: the case of Alambiques Gaúchos |
title_full_unstemmed |
Governance in the handmade cachaça chain: the case of Alambiques Gaúchos |
title_sort |
Governance in the handmade cachaça chain: the case of Alambiques Gaúchos |
author |
Scarton, Luciana Maria |
author_facet |
Scarton, Luciana Maria Waquil, Paulo Dabdab |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Waquil, Paulo Dabdab |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Scarton, Luciana Maria Waquil, Paulo Dabdab |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Alambiques Gaúchos Cachaça artesanal NEI Esquema da Indução das Formas de Governança. |
topic |
Alambiques Gaúchos Cachaça artesanal NEI Esquema da Indução das Formas de Governança. |
description |
Initiatives focusing on improving quality and product presentation have made Rio Grande do Sul stand out on handmade cachaça. This is because the creation, in 2005, the project called Alambiques Gaúchos, composed by 14 companies and with the aim of improving the perception of the market that Rio Grande do Sul offers good handmade cachaça. Besides the factors that have influence in its institutional and organizational environment because of its historical process, from 2010, the group faces other challenges, as the end of the project that used to keep it financially and internal conflicts that were the reason for some members give up. Thus, based on the Induction Scheme of the Forms of Governance included in the New Institutional Economics Theory (NIE), it aimed to understand the factors that influenced the transactions of the group, identifying its governance structure and what are its mechanisms for coordination. The Comparative Structural Analysis Discrete concluded that the governance structure that could be adopted by the group, would be hybrid, however, there is no coordination. It makes not possible a larger organization the members, prejudicing the development of their activities. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-05-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/gepec/article/view/5060 10.48075/igepec.v16i1.5060 |
url |
https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/gepec/article/view/5060 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.48075/igepec.v16i1.5060 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/gepec/article/view/5060/5099 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EdUnioeste |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EdUnioeste |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Informe GEPEC; v. 16 n. 1 (2012); 93-111 1679-415X 1676-0670 10.48075/igepec.v16i1 reponame:Informe Gepec (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) instacron:UNIOESTE |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) |
instacron_str |
UNIOESTE |
institution |
UNIOESTE |
reponame_str |
Informe Gepec (Online) |
collection |
Informe Gepec (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Informe Gepec (Online) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.gepec@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1796797390159609856 |