JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito & Paz |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1334 |
Resumo: | After certain considerations about the expansion of the Judiciary, judicialization, and activism in Brazil, followed by the analysis of decisions of the Federal Supreme Court that aused “backlash†effects, originated in the American constitutional law which means rejection of court decisions, it will be proposed a dialogue between the courts and the society in general as an instrument of the legitimacy of constitutional jurisdiction in the democratic order. This proposal will serve as an attempt to a possible strategy of democratic participation in decision making. The logic followed throughout this study is that dissent is a constitutive value in democratic societies and can only be reversed by improving the information process, which can be accomplished by facilitating its spread. In the structure and organization of the study, the methodology used will be hypothetical-deductive, based on the bibliographic research on the Federal Supreme Court. |
id |
UNISAL-2_e2b86d107afc05d3746a1ac84a32dfbd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1334 |
network_acronym_str |
UNISAL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito & Paz |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURTDECISÃO JUDICIAL E EFEITO BACKLASH À PARTIR DAS DECISÕES DO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERALAfter certain considerations about the expansion of the Judiciary, judicialization, and activism in Brazil, followed by the analysis of decisions of the Federal Supreme Court that aused “backlash†effects, originated in the American constitutional law which means rejection of court decisions, it will be proposed a dialogue between the courts and the society in general as an instrument of the legitimacy of constitutional jurisdiction in the democratic order. This proposal will serve as an attempt to a possible strategy of democratic participation in decision making. The logic followed throughout this study is that dissent is a constitutive value in democratic societies and can only be reversed by improving the information process, which can be accomplished by facilitating its spread. In the structure and organization of the study, the methodology used will be hypothetical-deductive, based on the bibliographic research on the Federal Supreme Court.Após algumas considerações sobre a expansão do Poder Judiciário, da judicialização e do ativismo no Brasil, seguida da análise de decisões do Supremo Tribunal Federal que tiveram efeitos “backlashâ€, termo originado no direito constitucional americano que significa rejeição das decisões dos tribunais, será proposta, como possÃvel estratégia de participação democrática na tomada de decisões, o diálogo entre as cortes e a sociedade em geral como um instrumento de legitimidade da jurisdição constitucional na ordem democrática. Ao fim, a lógica que se estabelece ao longo do texto é a de que o dissenso é um valor constitutivo na sociedade democrática, e que tal dissenso só poderá ser revertido a partir do enriquecimento do processo de informação, e para tanto, deve ter facilitada a sua veiculação. Na estruturação e organização do texto, a metodologia utilizada será a hipotético-dedutiva, baseada em pesquisa bibliográfica e na análise de casos do Supremo Tribunal Federal.Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo - U.E. Lorena2021-09-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/133410.32713/rdp.v1i44.1334Revista Direito & Paz; v. 1 n. 44 (2021): Revista Direito & Paz; 187-2062359-503510.32713/rdp.v1i44reponame:Revista Direito & Pazinstname:Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL)instacron:UNISALporhttps://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1334/573Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direito & Pazinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHoffmann, Grégora BeatrizLeal, Mônia Clarissa Hennig 2021-09-07T12:52:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1334Revistahttps://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/ONGhttps://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/oaimestrado.direito.lorena@unisal.br||metodologo2001@yahoo.com.br2359-50351518-7047opendoar:2021-09-07T12:52:26Revista Direito & Paz - Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT DECISÃO JUDICIAL E EFEITO BACKLASH À PARTIR DAS DECISÕES DO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL |
title |
JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT |
spellingShingle |
JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT Hoffmann, Grégora Beatriz |
title_short |
JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT |
title_full |
JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT |
title_fullStr |
JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT |
title_full_unstemmed |
JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT |
title_sort |
JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT |
author |
Hoffmann, Grégora Beatriz |
author_facet |
Hoffmann, Grégora Beatriz Leal, Mônia Clarissa Hennig |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Leal, Mônia Clarissa Hennig |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hoffmann, Grégora Beatriz Leal, Mônia Clarissa Hennig |
description |
After certain considerations about the expansion of the Judiciary, judicialization, and activism in Brazil, followed by the analysis of decisions of the Federal Supreme Court that aused “backlash†effects, originated in the American constitutional law which means rejection of court decisions, it will be proposed a dialogue between the courts and the society in general as an instrument of the legitimacy of constitutional jurisdiction in the democratic order. This proposal will serve as an attempt to a possible strategy of democratic participation in decision making. The logic followed throughout this study is that dissent is a constitutive value in democratic societies and can only be reversed by improving the information process, which can be accomplished by facilitating its spread. In the structure and organization of the study, the methodology used will be hypothetical-deductive, based on the bibliographic research on the Federal Supreme Court. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1334 10.32713/rdp.v1i44.1334 |
url |
https://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1334 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.32713/rdp.v1i44.1334 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1334/573 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direito & Paz info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direito & Paz |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo - U.E. Lorena |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo - U.E. Lorena |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito & Paz; v. 1 n. 44 (2021): Revista Direito & Paz; 187-206 2359-5035 10.32713/rdp.v1i44 reponame:Revista Direito & Paz instname:Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL) instacron:UNISAL |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL) |
instacron_str |
UNISAL |
institution |
UNISAL |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito & Paz |
collection |
Revista Direito & Paz |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito & Paz - Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mestrado.direito.lorena@unisal.br||metodologo2001@yahoo.com.br |
_version_ |
1798042364907880448 |