JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hoffmann, Grégora Beatriz
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Leal, Mônia Clarissa Hennig
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direito & Paz
Texto Completo: https://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1334
Resumo: After certain considerations about the expansion of the Judiciary, judicialization, and activism in Brazil, followed by the analysis of decisions of the Federal Supreme Court that aused “backlash” effects, originated in the American constitutional law which means rejection of court decisions, it will be proposed a dialogue between the courts and the society in general as an instrument of the legitimacy of constitutional jurisdiction in the democratic order. This proposal will serve as an attempt to a possible strategy of democratic participation in decision making. The logic followed throughout this study is that dissent is a constitutive value in democratic societies and can only be reversed by improving the information process, which can be accomplished by facilitating its spread. In the structure and organization of the study, the methodology used will be hypothetical-deductive, based on the bibliographic research on the Federal Supreme Court.
id UNISAL-2_e2b86d107afc05d3746a1ac84a32dfbd
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1334
network_acronym_str UNISAL-2
network_name_str Revista Direito & Paz
repository_id_str
spelling JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURTDECISÃO JUDICIAL E EFEITO BACKLASH À PARTIR DAS DECISÕES DO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERALAfter certain considerations about the expansion of the Judiciary, judicialization, and activism in Brazil, followed by the analysis of decisions of the Federal Supreme Court that aused “backlash” effects, originated in the American constitutional law which means rejection of court decisions, it will be proposed a dialogue between the courts and the society in general as an instrument of the legitimacy of constitutional jurisdiction in the democratic order. This proposal will serve as an attempt to a possible strategy of democratic participation in decision making. The logic followed throughout this study is that dissent is a constitutive value in democratic societies and can only be reversed by improving the information process, which can be accomplished by facilitating its spread. In the structure and organization of the study, the methodology used will be hypothetical-deductive, based on the bibliographic research on the Federal Supreme Court.Após algumas considerações sobre a expansão do Poder Judiciário, da judicialização e do ativismo no Brasil, seguida da análise de decisões do Supremo Tribunal Federal que tiveram efeitos “backlash”, termo originado no direito constitucional americano que significa rejeição das decisões dos tribunais, será proposta, como possível estratégia de participação democrática na tomada de decisões, o diálogo entre as cortes e a sociedade em geral como um instrumento de legitimidade da jurisdição constitucional na ordem democrática. Ao fim, a lógica que se estabelece ao longo do texto é a de que o dissenso é um valor constitutivo na sociedade democrática, e que tal dissenso só poderá ser revertido a partir do enriquecimento do processo de informação, e para tanto, deve ter facilitada a sua veiculação. Na estruturação e organização do texto, a metodologia utilizada será a hipotético-dedutiva, baseada em pesquisa bibliográfica e na análise de casos do Supremo Tribunal Federal.Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo - U.E. Lorena2021-09-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/133410.32713/rdp.v1i44.1334Revista Direito & Paz; v. 1 n. 44 (2021): Revista Direito & Paz; 187-2062359-503510.32713/rdp.v1i44reponame:Revista Direito & Pazinstname:Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL)instacron:UNISALporhttps://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1334/573Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direito & Pazinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHoffmann, Grégora BeatrizLeal, Mônia Clarissa Hennig 2021-09-07T12:52:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1334Revistahttps://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/ONGhttps://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/oaimestrado.direito.lorena@unisal.br||metodologo2001@yahoo.com.br2359-50351518-7047opendoar:2021-09-07T12:52:26Revista Direito & Paz - Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT
DECISÃO JUDICIAL E EFEITO BACKLASH À PARTIR DAS DECISÕES DO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL
title JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT
spellingShingle JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT
Hoffmann, Grégora Beatriz
title_short JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT
title_full JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT
title_fullStr JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT
title_full_unstemmed JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT
title_sort JUDICIAL DECISION AND BACKLASH FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT
author Hoffmann, Grégora Beatriz
author_facet Hoffmann, Grégora Beatriz
Leal, Mônia Clarissa Hennig
author_role author
author2 Leal, Mônia Clarissa Hennig
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hoffmann, Grégora Beatriz
Leal, Mônia Clarissa Hennig
description After certain considerations about the expansion of the Judiciary, judicialization, and activism in Brazil, followed by the analysis of decisions of the Federal Supreme Court that aused “backlash” effects, originated in the American constitutional law which means rejection of court decisions, it will be proposed a dialogue between the courts and the society in general as an instrument of the legitimacy of constitutional jurisdiction in the democratic order. This proposal will serve as an attempt to a possible strategy of democratic participation in decision making. The logic followed throughout this study is that dissent is a constitutive value in democratic societies and can only be reversed by improving the information process, which can be accomplished by facilitating its spread. In the structure and organization of the study, the methodology used will be hypothetical-deductive, based on the bibliographic research on the Federal Supreme Court.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1334
10.32713/rdp.v1i44.1334
url https://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1334
identifier_str_mv 10.32713/rdp.v1i44.1334
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.unisal.br/lo/index.php/direitoepaz/article/view/1334/573
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direito & Paz
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Direito & Paz
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo - U.E. Lorena
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo - U.E. Lorena
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direito & Paz; v. 1 n. 44 (2021): Revista Direito & Paz; 187-206
2359-5035
10.32713/rdp.v1i44
reponame:Revista Direito & Paz
instname:Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL)
instacron:UNISAL
instname_str Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL)
instacron_str UNISAL
institution UNISAL
reponame_str Revista Direito & Paz
collection Revista Direito & Paz
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito & Paz - Centro Universitário Salesiano de São Paulo (UNISAL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mestrado.direito.lorena@unisal.br||metodologo2001@yahoo.com.br
_version_ 1798042364907880448