Assessing L2 Portuguese writing: idea density and sentence complexity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lopes, Ângela Filipe
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Pinto, Maria da Graça Lisboa Castro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
Texto Completo: https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/17384
Resumo: Abstract: Idea density and grammatical complexity were proposed as writing assessment parameters by Snowdon et al. (1996) and by Kemper et al. (2001) in the Nun Study (Snowdon 2001). The same parameters are used here to assess advanced Portuguese L2 writing in a learning context (C1/C2) in order to confirm them as valid assessment measures in a L2. Quality in writing is expected to translate into lexical precision and richness as well as sentence complexity. Results confirmed that reading has an influence on writing quality, insofar as the students who usually read are the ones who got the highest scores in both parameters. Results were nevertheless highly variable due to the heterogeneity of the group of participants. Both measures, idea density and grammatical complexity, were found to be correlated in two writing tasks, a synthesis and a writing prompt, which led to the conclusion that participants who write with lexical precision and richness also produce higher complexity sentences regardless of language and writing task variability.   Keywords: idea density; grammatical complexity; assessing writing; Portuguese L2.   Keywords: dyslexia; educational measurement; learning disabilities; validation study; psychometrics.
id UNISC-3_c146ff8b656e534f681418f91be93404
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/17384
network_acronym_str UNISC-3
network_name_str Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Assessing L2 Portuguese writing: idea density and sentence complexityAvaliando a escrita do português L2: densidade de ideias e complexidade das frasesAbstract: Idea density and grammatical complexity were proposed as writing assessment parameters by Snowdon et al. (1996) and by Kemper et al. (2001) in the Nun Study (Snowdon 2001). The same parameters are used here to assess advanced Portuguese L2 writing in a learning context (C1/C2) in order to confirm them as valid assessment measures in a L2. Quality in writing is expected to translate into lexical precision and richness as well as sentence complexity. Results confirmed that reading has an influence on writing quality, insofar as the students who usually read are the ones who got the highest scores in both parameters. Results were nevertheless highly variable due to the heterogeneity of the group of participants. Both measures, idea density and grammatical complexity, were found to be correlated in two writing tasks, a synthesis and a writing prompt, which led to the conclusion that participants who write with lexical precision and richness also produce higher complexity sentences regardless of language and writing task variability.   Keywords: idea density; grammatical complexity; assessing writing; Portuguese L2.   Keywords: dyslexia; educational measurement; learning disabilities; validation study; psychometrics.Resumo: A densidade de ideias e a complexidade gramatical foram propostas como parâmetros de avaliação da escrita por Snowdon et al. (1996) e por Kemper et al. (2001) no Nun Study (Snowdon 2001). Os mesmos parâmetros são usados ​​aqui para avaliar a escrita de português avançado em L2 em contexto de aprendizagem (C1/C2), a fim de confirmá-los como medidas de avaliação válidas em uma L2. Espera-se que a qualidade na escrita se traduza em precisão e riqueza lexical, bem como em complexidade das frases. Os resultados confirmaram que a leitura tem influência na qualidade da escrita, na medida em que os alunos que costumam ler são os que obtiveram as maiores pontuações em ambos os parâmetros. Os resultados foram, no entanto, altamente variáveis ​​devido à heterogeneidade do grupo de participantes. Ambas as medidas, densidade de ideias e complexidade gramatical, foram correlacionadas em duas tarefas de escrita, uma síntese e uma escrita, o que levou à conclusão de que os participantes que escrevem com precisão e riqueza lexical também produzem sentenças de maior complexidade, independentemente da variabilidade da tarefa de linguagem e de escrita.   Palavras-chave: densidade de ideias; complexidade gramatical; avaliação da escrita; Português L2.Edunisc2022-01-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/1738410.17058/signo.v47i88.17384Signo; v. 47 n. 88 (2022): ISAPL ; 73-861982-2014reponame:Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCenghttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/17384/10337Copyright (c) 2022 Signoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLopes, Ângela FilipePinto, Maria da Graça Lisboa Castro2022-03-31T19:15:47Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/17384Revistahttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signohttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/oairgabriel@unisc.br||revistasigno.unisc@gmail.com1982-20140101-1812opendoar:2022-03-31T19:15:47Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessing L2 Portuguese writing: idea density and sentence complexity
Avaliando a escrita do português L2: densidade de ideias e complexidade das frases
title Assessing L2 Portuguese writing: idea density and sentence complexity
spellingShingle Assessing L2 Portuguese writing: idea density and sentence complexity
Lopes, Ângela Filipe
title_short Assessing L2 Portuguese writing: idea density and sentence complexity
title_full Assessing L2 Portuguese writing: idea density and sentence complexity
title_fullStr Assessing L2 Portuguese writing: idea density and sentence complexity
title_full_unstemmed Assessing L2 Portuguese writing: idea density and sentence complexity
title_sort Assessing L2 Portuguese writing: idea density and sentence complexity
author Lopes, Ângela Filipe
author_facet Lopes, Ângela Filipe
Pinto, Maria da Graça Lisboa Castro
author_role author
author2 Pinto, Maria da Graça Lisboa Castro
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lopes, Ângela Filipe
Pinto, Maria da Graça Lisboa Castro
description Abstract: Idea density and grammatical complexity were proposed as writing assessment parameters by Snowdon et al. (1996) and by Kemper et al. (2001) in the Nun Study (Snowdon 2001). The same parameters are used here to assess advanced Portuguese L2 writing in a learning context (C1/C2) in order to confirm them as valid assessment measures in a L2. Quality in writing is expected to translate into lexical precision and richness as well as sentence complexity. Results confirmed that reading has an influence on writing quality, insofar as the students who usually read are the ones who got the highest scores in both parameters. Results were nevertheless highly variable due to the heterogeneity of the group of participants. Both measures, idea density and grammatical complexity, were found to be correlated in two writing tasks, a synthesis and a writing prompt, which led to the conclusion that participants who write with lexical precision and richness also produce higher complexity sentences regardless of language and writing task variability.   Keywords: idea density; grammatical complexity; assessing writing; Portuguese L2.   Keywords: dyslexia; educational measurement; learning disabilities; validation study; psychometrics.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/17384
10.17058/signo.v47i88.17384
url https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/17384
identifier_str_mv 10.17058/signo.v47i88.17384
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/17384/10337
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Signo
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Signo
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edunisc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edunisc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Signo; v. 47 n. 88 (2022): ISAPL ; 73-86
1982-2014
reponame:Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron:UNISC
instname_str Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron_str UNISC
institution UNISC
reponame_str Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
collection Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rgabriel@unisc.br||revistasigno.unisc@gmail.com
_version_ 1800218792719024128