Of the (im) possibilities of evaluating literary reading in school: a study case
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/11985 |
Resumo: | The work with the literary text in Middle Scholl still lacks clear theoretical and methodological foundation – which includes the official documents – in order to ground an effectivelly productive teaching practice regarding readers’ development. Compressed between two distinct approaches to dealing with the literary text, Middle Scholl teachers seem to drift between the perspective of reading as participation, whereby reading promotion overcomes the text, and reading as distancing, whose formalistic emphasis often rejects subjectivity. This paper intends, based on a case study, to present a conciliation alternative between the two perspectives by using different pedagogical tools to record the subjective reception of literary texts: reading journal, reader autobiography and literary correspondence. We will follow the course of a retained sixth grade student through 2016 and 2017 registered on his reader testimonies to show how subjective investment in reading processing makes it possible not only to develop reading skills but also an affective engagement with the act of reading. |
id |
UNISC-3_cc4fb30fddb1f28c1473191bdf94a47b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/11985 |
network_acronym_str |
UNISC-3 |
network_name_str |
Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Of the (im) possibilities of evaluating literary reading in school: a study caseDas (im) possibilidades de avaliar a leitura literária na escola: um estudo de casoRecepção. Leitura subjetiva. Anos finais do ensino fundamental.Reception. Subjective reading. Middle School.The work with the literary text in Middle Scholl still lacks clear theoretical and methodological foundation – which includes the official documents – in order to ground an effectivelly productive teaching practice regarding readers’ development. Compressed between two distinct approaches to dealing with the literary text, Middle Scholl teachers seem to drift between the perspective of reading as participation, whereby reading promotion overcomes the text, and reading as distancing, whose formalistic emphasis often rejects subjectivity. This paper intends, based on a case study, to present a conciliation alternative between the two perspectives by using different pedagogical tools to record the subjective reception of literary texts: reading journal, reader autobiography and literary correspondence. We will follow the course of a retained sixth grade student through 2016 and 2017 registered on his reader testimonies to show how subjective investment in reading processing makes it possible not only to develop reading skills but also an affective engagement with the act of reading.O trabalho com o texto literário nos anos finais do ensino fundamental ainda carece de fundamentação teórico-metodológica clara – inclusive nos documentos oficiais – para balizar uma prática docente efetivamente produtiva no que tange à formação de leitores. Emparedado entre duas lógicas distintas de abordagem do texto literário, o EFII parece ficar à deriva entre a perspectiva da leitura como participação, segundo a qual a promoção da leitura se sobreleva ao texto, e a leitura como distanciamento, cuja ênfase formalista não raro rechaça a subjetividade leitora. Este trabalho pretende, então, a partir de um estudo de caso, apresentar uma alternativa de conciliação entre as duas perspectivas a partir do uso de instrumentos pedagógicos de registro da recepção subjetiva de textos literários: diário de leitura, autobiografia de leitor e correspondência literária. Acompanharemos o percurso de um aluno repetente do sexto ano do ensino fundamental ao longo de 2016 e 2017 por meio de seus testemunhos de leitor para mostrar como o investimento subjetivo no processamento da leitura torna possível não só o desenvolvimento de competências leitoras como o envolvimento afetivo com o ato de ler.Edunisc2018-09-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/1198510.17058/signo.v43i78.11985Signo; v. 43 n. 78 (2018); 78-901982-2014reponame:Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCporhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/11985/pdf_1Copyright (c) 2018 Signoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Raquel e2019-04-02T19:05:19Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/11985Revistahttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signohttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/oairgabriel@unisc.br||revistasigno.unisc@gmail.com1982-20140101-1812opendoar:2019-04-02T19:05:19Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Of the (im) possibilities of evaluating literary reading in school: a study case Das (im) possibilidades de avaliar a leitura literária na escola: um estudo de caso |
title |
Of the (im) possibilities of evaluating literary reading in school: a study case |
spellingShingle |
Of the (im) possibilities of evaluating literary reading in school: a study case Souza, Raquel e Recepção. Leitura subjetiva. Anos finais do ensino fundamental. Reception. Subjective reading. Middle School. |
title_short |
Of the (im) possibilities of evaluating literary reading in school: a study case |
title_full |
Of the (im) possibilities of evaluating literary reading in school: a study case |
title_fullStr |
Of the (im) possibilities of evaluating literary reading in school: a study case |
title_full_unstemmed |
Of the (im) possibilities of evaluating literary reading in school: a study case |
title_sort |
Of the (im) possibilities of evaluating literary reading in school: a study case |
author |
Souza, Raquel e |
author_facet |
Souza, Raquel e |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Raquel e |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Recepção. Leitura subjetiva. Anos finais do ensino fundamental. Reception. Subjective reading. Middle School. |
topic |
Recepção. Leitura subjetiva. Anos finais do ensino fundamental. Reception. Subjective reading. Middle School. |
description |
The work with the literary text in Middle Scholl still lacks clear theoretical and methodological foundation – which includes the official documents – in order to ground an effectivelly productive teaching practice regarding readers’ development. Compressed between two distinct approaches to dealing with the literary text, Middle Scholl teachers seem to drift between the perspective of reading as participation, whereby reading promotion overcomes the text, and reading as distancing, whose formalistic emphasis often rejects subjectivity. This paper intends, based on a case study, to present a conciliation alternative between the two perspectives by using different pedagogical tools to record the subjective reception of literary texts: reading journal, reader autobiography and literary correspondence. We will follow the course of a retained sixth grade student through 2016 and 2017 registered on his reader testimonies to show how subjective investment in reading processing makes it possible not only to develop reading skills but also an affective engagement with the act of reading. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/11985 10.17058/signo.v43i78.11985 |
url |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/11985 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17058/signo.v43i78.11985 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/11985/pdf_1 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Signo info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Signo |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Edunisc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Edunisc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Signo; v. 43 n. 78 (2018); 78-90 1982-2014 reponame:Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) instacron:UNISC |
instname_str |
Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) |
instacron_str |
UNISC |
institution |
UNISC |
reponame_str |
Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
collection |
Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rgabriel@unisc.br||revistasigno.unisc@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1800218791591804928 |