A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães Rosa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schaefer, Sérgio
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
Texto Completo: https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/8982
Resumo: This article aims at analysing both the esthetical form and the rearticulation of its internal sediments as proposed by João Guimarães Rosa in his literary works. The analysis’ theoretical support is based on Theodor W. Adorno’s Teoria Estética. The broad objective of this study is to show that Rosa’s esthetical formalization is a call for changing. At the end of the article, a brief comparative study is made between Guimarães Rosa’s and Dostoievski’s calls for changing. Accordingly, some of the main issues of Bakthin’s theories about the works of the Russian writer will be reminded of and some of the main differences and similarities between Rosa’s and Dostoievski’s formal rearticulations will be pointed out.
id UNISC-3_ea315c2f7134cab96f0ad65886d15f3a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/8982
network_acronym_str UNISC-3
network_name_str Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães RosaThe Rearticulation of Formal Sediments in Guimarães Rosas’s Literary DiscourseForma estéticaRearticulação formal e mudançaGuimarães RosaTheodor AdornoDostoiévski.Esthetical formFormal rearticulation and changingGuimarães RosaTheodor AdornoDostoievski.This article aims at analysing both the esthetical form and the rearticulation of its internal sediments as proposed by João Guimarães Rosa in his literary works. The analysis’ theoretical support is based on Theodor W. Adorno’s Teoria Estética. The broad objective of this study is to show that Rosa’s esthetical formalization is a call for changing. At the end of the article, a brief comparative study is made between Guimarães Rosa’s and Dostoievski’s calls for changing. Accordingly, some of the main issues of Bakthin’s theories about the works of the Russian writer will be reminded of and some of the main differences and similarities between Rosa’s and Dostoievski’s formal rearticulations will be pointed out.This article aims at analysing both the esthetical form and the rearticulation of its internal sediments as proposed by João Guimarães Rosa in his literary works. The analysis’ theoretical support is based on Theodor W. Adorno’s Teoria Estética. The broad objective of this study is to show that Rosa’s esthetical formalization is a call for changing. At the end of the article, a brief comparative study is made between Guimarães Rosa’s and Dostoievski’s calls for changing. Accordingly, some of the main issues of Bakthin’s theories about the works of the Russian writer will be reminded of and some of the main differences and similarities between Rosa’s and Dostoievski’s formal rearticulations will be pointed out.Edunisc2017-05-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/898210.17058/signo.v42i74.8982Signo; v. 42 n. 74 (2017); 139-1501982-2014reponame:Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCenghttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/8982/pdfCopyright (c) 2017 Signoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchaefer, Sérgio2018-07-24T19:10:13Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/8982Revistahttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signohttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/oairgabriel@unisc.br||revistasigno.unisc@gmail.com1982-20140101-1812opendoar:2018-07-24T19:10:13Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães Rosa
The Rearticulation of Formal Sediments in Guimarães Rosas’s Literary Discourse
title A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães Rosa
spellingShingle A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães Rosa
Schaefer, Sérgio
Forma estética
Rearticulação formal e mudança
Guimarães Rosa
Theodor Adorno
Dostoiévski.
Esthetical form
Formal rearticulation and changing
Guimarães Rosa
Theodor Adorno
Dostoievski.
title_short A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães Rosa
title_full A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães Rosa
title_fullStr A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães Rosa
title_full_unstemmed A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães Rosa
title_sort A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães Rosa
author Schaefer, Sérgio
author_facet Schaefer, Sérgio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schaefer, Sérgio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Forma estética
Rearticulação formal e mudança
Guimarães Rosa
Theodor Adorno
Dostoiévski.
Esthetical form
Formal rearticulation and changing
Guimarães Rosa
Theodor Adorno
Dostoievski.
topic Forma estética
Rearticulação formal e mudança
Guimarães Rosa
Theodor Adorno
Dostoiévski.
Esthetical form
Formal rearticulation and changing
Guimarães Rosa
Theodor Adorno
Dostoievski.
description This article aims at analysing both the esthetical form and the rearticulation of its internal sediments as proposed by João Guimarães Rosa in his literary works. The analysis’ theoretical support is based on Theodor W. Adorno’s Teoria Estética. The broad objective of this study is to show that Rosa’s esthetical formalization is a call for changing. At the end of the article, a brief comparative study is made between Guimarães Rosa’s and Dostoievski’s calls for changing. Accordingly, some of the main issues of Bakthin’s theories about the works of the Russian writer will be reminded of and some of the main differences and similarities between Rosa’s and Dostoievski’s formal rearticulations will be pointed out.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/8982
10.17058/signo.v42i74.8982
url https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/8982
identifier_str_mv 10.17058/signo.v42i74.8982
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/8982/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Signo
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Signo
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edunisc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edunisc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Signo; v. 42 n. 74 (2017); 139-150
1982-2014
reponame:Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron:UNISC
instname_str Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron_str UNISC
institution UNISC
reponame_str Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
collection Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rgabriel@unisc.br||revistasigno.unisc@gmail.com
_version_ 1800218790879821824