A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães Rosa
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/8982 |
Resumo: | This article aims at analysing both the esthetical form and the rearticulation of its internal sediments as proposed by João Guimarães Rosa in his literary works. The analysis’ theoretical support is based on Theodor W. Adorno’s Teoria Estética. The broad objective of this study is to show that Rosa’s esthetical formalization is a call for changing. At the end of the article, a brief comparative study is made between Guimarães Rosa’s and Dostoievski’s calls for changing. Accordingly, some of the main issues of Bakthin’s theories about the works of the Russian writer will be reminded of and some of the main differences and similarities between Rosa’s and Dostoievski’s formal rearticulations will be pointed out. |
id |
UNISC-3_ea315c2f7134cab96f0ad65886d15f3a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/8982 |
network_acronym_str |
UNISC-3 |
network_name_str |
Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães RosaThe Rearticulation of Formal Sediments in Guimarães Rosas’s Literary DiscourseForma estéticaRearticulação formal e mudançaGuimarães RosaTheodor AdornoDostoiévski.Esthetical formFormal rearticulation and changingGuimarães RosaTheodor AdornoDostoievski.This article aims at analysing both the esthetical form and the rearticulation of its internal sediments as proposed by João Guimarães Rosa in his literary works. The analysis’ theoretical support is based on Theodor W. Adorno’s Teoria Estética. The broad objective of this study is to show that Rosa’s esthetical formalization is a call for changing. At the end of the article, a brief comparative study is made between Guimarães Rosa’s and Dostoievski’s calls for changing. Accordingly, some of the main issues of Bakthin’s theories about the works of the Russian writer will be reminded of and some of the main differences and similarities between Rosa’s and Dostoievski’s formal rearticulations will be pointed out.This article aims at analysing both the esthetical form and the rearticulation of its internal sediments as proposed by João Guimarães Rosa in his literary works. The analysis’ theoretical support is based on Theodor W. Adorno’s Teoria Estética. The broad objective of this study is to show that Rosa’s esthetical formalization is a call for changing. At the end of the article, a brief comparative study is made between Guimarães Rosa’s and Dostoievski’s calls for changing. Accordingly, some of the main issues of Bakthin’s theories about the works of the Russian writer will be reminded of and some of the main differences and similarities between Rosa’s and Dostoievski’s formal rearticulations will be pointed out.Edunisc2017-05-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/898210.17058/signo.v42i74.8982Signo; v. 42 n. 74 (2017); 139-1501982-2014reponame:Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCenghttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/8982/pdfCopyright (c) 2017 Signoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchaefer, Sérgio2018-07-24T19:10:13Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/8982Revistahttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signohttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/oairgabriel@unisc.br||revistasigno.unisc@gmail.com1982-20140101-1812opendoar:2018-07-24T19:10:13Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães Rosa The Rearticulation of Formal Sediments in Guimarães Rosas’s Literary Discourse |
title |
A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães Rosa |
spellingShingle |
A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães Rosa Schaefer, Sérgio Forma estética Rearticulação formal e mudança Guimarães Rosa Theodor Adorno Dostoiévski. Esthetical form Formal rearticulation and changing Guimarães Rosa Theodor Adorno Dostoievski. |
title_short |
A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães Rosa |
title_full |
A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães Rosa |
title_fullStr |
A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães Rosa |
title_full_unstemmed |
A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães Rosa |
title_sort |
A rearticulação dos sedimentos formais no discurso literário de Guimarães Rosa |
author |
Schaefer, Sérgio |
author_facet |
Schaefer, Sérgio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schaefer, Sérgio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Forma estética Rearticulação formal e mudança Guimarães Rosa Theodor Adorno Dostoiévski. Esthetical form Formal rearticulation and changing Guimarães Rosa Theodor Adorno Dostoievski. |
topic |
Forma estética Rearticulação formal e mudança Guimarães Rosa Theodor Adorno Dostoiévski. Esthetical form Formal rearticulation and changing Guimarães Rosa Theodor Adorno Dostoievski. |
description |
This article aims at analysing both the esthetical form and the rearticulation of its internal sediments as proposed by João Guimarães Rosa in his literary works. The analysis’ theoretical support is based on Theodor W. Adorno’s Teoria Estética. The broad objective of this study is to show that Rosa’s esthetical formalization is a call for changing. At the end of the article, a brief comparative study is made between Guimarães Rosa’s and Dostoievski’s calls for changing. Accordingly, some of the main issues of Bakthin’s theories about the works of the Russian writer will be reminded of and some of the main differences and similarities between Rosa’s and Dostoievski’s formal rearticulations will be pointed out. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-05-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/8982 10.17058/signo.v42i74.8982 |
url |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/8982 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17058/signo.v42i74.8982 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/8982/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Signo info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Signo |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Edunisc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Edunisc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Signo; v. 42 n. 74 (2017); 139-150 1982-2014 reponame:Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) instacron:UNISC |
instname_str |
Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) |
instacron_str |
UNISC |
institution |
UNISC |
reponame_str |
Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
collection |
Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rgabriel@unisc.br||revistasigno.unisc@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1800218790879821824 |