The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example with

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Patrus, Roberto
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Silva, Vinícius Tolentino Oliveira e
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Avaliação (Campinas. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/3612
Resumo: The advent of the search for articles through the Web has made bibliographic research faster and more economical. Difficult, however, is to organize the huge amount of papers that return from the search. Although there are innumerable articles on the methods and techniques of research, there are few papers about techniques of literature review. Faced with this theoretical gap and the practical difficulty of master's and doctoral students in organizing the literature review in their academic works, this paper aims to present a useful tool for the organization of literature review of theses and dissertations: the Tree of Science (ToS). With this feature, researchers search the Web of Science (WOS) databases and create a text file with the selected references. Then, by submitting this file to ToS, the site constructs a tree, using graph theory concepts, through the analysis of the citation networks. The tree classifies the references found in three levels: root, which gathers the seminal articles; trunk, which aggregates structuring articles; and leaves, which indicate the recent articles. It is up to the researcher to design the branches, that means the approaches in which the articles are located.  As a way to bring an example of the use of the ToS tool, we search for the terms "Evaluation" and "Postgraduate". Our review organized four perspectives (branches): Postgraduate Evaluation / Capes, Productivism, Educational Evaluation, and Scientific Production. Through this example, the article demonstrates the usefulness of ToS for the organization of bibliographic research.
id UNISO-1_7dba88066234c3ff12953ea772d99298
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.uniso.br:article/3612
network_acronym_str UNISO-1
network_name_str Avaliação (Campinas. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example withA organização de uma revisão de literatura por meio da Tree of Science (Árvore da Ciência): um exemplo sobre a avaliação da pós-graduaçãoThe advent of the search for articles through the Web has made bibliographic research faster and more economical. Difficult, however, is to organize the huge amount of papers that return from the search. Although there are innumerable articles on the methods and techniques of research, there are few papers about techniques of literature review. Faced with this theoretical gap and the practical difficulty of master's and doctoral students in organizing the literature review in their academic works, this paper aims to present a useful tool for the organization of literature review of theses and dissertations: the Tree of Science (ToS). With this feature, researchers search the Web of Science (WOS) databases and create a text file with the selected references. Then, by submitting this file to ToS, the site constructs a tree, using graph theory concepts, through the analysis of the citation networks. The tree classifies the references found in three levels: root, which gathers the seminal articles; trunk, which aggregates structuring articles; and leaves, which indicate the recent articles. It is up to the researcher to design the branches, that means the approaches in which the articles are located.  As a way to bring an example of the use of the ToS tool, we search for the terms "Evaluation" and "Postgraduate". Our review organized four perspectives (branches): Postgraduate Evaluation / Capes, Productivism, Educational Evaluation, and Scientific Production. Through this example, the article demonstrates the usefulness of ToS for the organization of bibliographic research.O advento da busca por artigos por meio da Web tornou a pesquisa bibliográfica mais rápida e econômica. Difícil, no entanto, é organizar a enorme quantidade de papers que retornam da pesquisa. Embora haja na literatura inúmeros artigos sobre os métodos e técnicas de pesquisa, poucos são os trabalhos que abordam as técnicas de revisão de literatura. Tendo em vista tal lacuna teórica e a dificuldade prática dos estudantes de mestrado e doutorado em organizar o referencial teórico de seus trabalhos acadêmicos, objetivamos com este artigo apresentar uma ferramenta que tem se mostrado útil para a organização da revisão de literatura de teses e dissertações: a Tree of Science (ToS), Árvore da Ciência. Com este recurso, os pesquisadores realizam buscas nas bases de dados da Web Of Science (WOS), criam um arquivo de texto com as referências selecionadas e o submete para a montagem de uma árvore, que classifica as referências encontradas em três níveis, utilizando conceitos da teoria dos grafos, por meio da análise das redes de citações: a raiz, que reúne os artigos seminais; o tronco, que agrega artigos estruturadores; e as folhas, que indica perspectivas de pesquisa, em geral artigos mais recentes. Como forma de trazer um exemplo do uso da ferramenta ToS, realizamos uma busca pelos termos “Avaliação” e “Pós-graduação”. Nossa revisão organizou quatro perspectivas: Avaliação da pós-graduação / Capes, Produtivismo, Avaliação educacional e Produção cientifica. Por meio desse exemplo, o artigo demonstra a utilidade da ToS para a organização da pesquisa bibliográfica.Unicamp; Uniso2019-05-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/361210.1590/s1414-40772019000100005Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2019)Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; v. 24 n. 1 (2019)1982-57651414-4077reponame:Avaliação (Campinas. Online)instname:Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)instacron:UNISOporhttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/3612/3221Copyright (c) 2019 Avaliação - Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superiorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPatrus, RobertoSilva, Vinícius Tolentino Oliveira e2019-05-08T22:15:35Zoai:ojs.periodicos.uniso.br:article/3612Revistahttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/PUBhttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/oai||revistaavaliacao@uniso.br1982-57651414-4077opendoar:2019-05-08T22:15:35Avaliação (Campinas. Online) - Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example with
A organização de uma revisão de literatura por meio da Tree of Science (Árvore da Ciência): um exemplo sobre a avaliação da pós-graduação
title The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example with
spellingShingle The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example with
Patrus, Roberto
title_short The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example with
title_full The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example with
title_fullStr The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example with
title_full_unstemmed The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example with
title_sort The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example with
author Patrus, Roberto
author_facet Patrus, Roberto
Silva, Vinícius Tolentino Oliveira e
author_role author
author2 Silva, Vinícius Tolentino Oliveira e
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Patrus, Roberto
Silva, Vinícius Tolentino Oliveira e
description The advent of the search for articles through the Web has made bibliographic research faster and more economical. Difficult, however, is to organize the huge amount of papers that return from the search. Although there are innumerable articles on the methods and techniques of research, there are few papers about techniques of literature review. Faced with this theoretical gap and the practical difficulty of master's and doctoral students in organizing the literature review in their academic works, this paper aims to present a useful tool for the organization of literature review of theses and dissertations: the Tree of Science (ToS). With this feature, researchers search the Web of Science (WOS) databases and create a text file with the selected references. Then, by submitting this file to ToS, the site constructs a tree, using graph theory concepts, through the analysis of the citation networks. The tree classifies the references found in three levels: root, which gathers the seminal articles; trunk, which aggregates structuring articles; and leaves, which indicate the recent articles. It is up to the researcher to design the branches, that means the approaches in which the articles are located.  As a way to bring an example of the use of the ToS tool, we search for the terms "Evaluation" and "Postgraduate". Our review organized four perspectives (branches): Postgraduate Evaluation / Capes, Productivism, Educational Evaluation, and Scientific Production. Through this example, the article demonstrates the usefulness of ToS for the organization of bibliographic research.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/3612
10.1590/s1414-40772019000100005
url https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/3612
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/s1414-40772019000100005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/3612/3221
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Avaliação - Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Avaliação - Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unicamp; Uniso
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unicamp; Uniso
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2019)
Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; v. 24 n. 1 (2019)
1982-5765
1414-4077
reponame:Avaliação (Campinas. Online)
instname:Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)
instacron:UNISO
instname_str Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)
instacron_str UNISO
institution UNISO
reponame_str Avaliação (Campinas. Online)
collection Avaliação (Campinas. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Avaliação (Campinas. Online) - Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaavaliacao@uniso.br
_version_ 1800219609182240768