The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example with
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Avaliação (Campinas. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/3612 |
Resumo: | The advent of the search for articles through the Web has made bibliographic research faster and more economical. Difficult, however, is to organize the huge amount of papers that return from the search. Although there are innumerable articles on the methods and techniques of research, there are few papers about techniques of literature review. Faced with this theoretical gap and the practical difficulty of master's and doctoral students in organizing the literature review in their academic works, this paper aims to present a useful tool for the organization of literature review of theses and dissertations: the Tree of Science (ToS). With this feature, researchers search the Web of Science (WOS) databases and create a text file with the selected references. Then, by submitting this file to ToS, the site constructs a tree, using graph theory concepts, through the analysis of the citation networks. The tree classifies the references found in three levels: root, which gathers the seminal articles; trunk, which aggregates structuring articles; and leaves, which indicate the recent articles. It is up to the researcher to design the branches, that means the approaches in which the articles are located. As a way to bring an example of the use of the ToS tool, we search for the terms "Evaluation" and "Postgraduate". Our review organized four perspectives (branches): Postgraduate Evaluation / Capes, Productivism, Educational Evaluation, and Scientific Production. Through this example, the article demonstrates the usefulness of ToS for the organization of bibliographic research. |
id |
UNISO-1_7dba88066234c3ff12953ea772d99298 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.uniso.br:article/3612 |
network_acronym_str |
UNISO-1 |
network_name_str |
Avaliação (Campinas. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example withA organização de uma revisão de literatura por meio da Tree of Science (Árvore da Ciência): um exemplo sobre a avaliação da pós-graduaçãoThe advent of the search for articles through the Web has made bibliographic research faster and more economical. Difficult, however, is to organize the huge amount of papers that return from the search. Although there are innumerable articles on the methods and techniques of research, there are few papers about techniques of literature review. Faced with this theoretical gap and the practical difficulty of master's and doctoral students in organizing the literature review in their academic works, this paper aims to present a useful tool for the organization of literature review of theses and dissertations: the Tree of Science (ToS). With this feature, researchers search the Web of Science (WOS) databases and create a text file with the selected references. Then, by submitting this file to ToS, the site constructs a tree, using graph theory concepts, through the analysis of the citation networks. The tree classifies the references found in three levels: root, which gathers the seminal articles; trunk, which aggregates structuring articles; and leaves, which indicate the recent articles. It is up to the researcher to design the branches, that means the approaches in which the articles are located. As a way to bring an example of the use of the ToS tool, we search for the terms "Evaluation" and "Postgraduate". Our review organized four perspectives (branches): Postgraduate Evaluation / Capes, Productivism, Educational Evaluation, and Scientific Production. Through this example, the article demonstrates the usefulness of ToS for the organization of bibliographic research.O advento da busca por artigos por meio da Web tornou a pesquisa bibliográfica mais rápida e econômica. Difícil, no entanto, é organizar a enorme quantidade de papers que retornam da pesquisa. Embora haja na literatura inúmeros artigos sobre os métodos e técnicas de pesquisa, poucos são os trabalhos que abordam as técnicas de revisão de literatura. Tendo em vista tal lacuna teórica e a dificuldade prática dos estudantes de mestrado e doutorado em organizar o referencial teórico de seus trabalhos acadêmicos, objetivamos com este artigo apresentar uma ferramenta que tem se mostrado útil para a organização da revisão de literatura de teses e dissertações: a Tree of Science (ToS), Árvore da Ciência. Com este recurso, os pesquisadores realizam buscas nas bases de dados da Web Of Science (WOS), criam um arquivo de texto com as referências selecionadas e o submete para a montagem de uma árvore, que classifica as referências encontradas em três níveis, utilizando conceitos da teoria dos grafos, por meio da análise das redes de citações: a raiz, que reúne os artigos seminais; o tronco, que agrega artigos estruturadores; e as folhas, que indica perspectivas de pesquisa, em geral artigos mais recentes. Como forma de trazer um exemplo do uso da ferramenta ToS, realizamos uma busca pelos termos “Avaliação” e “Pós-graduação”. Nossa revisão organizou quatro perspectivas: Avaliação da pós-graduação / Capes, Produtivismo, Avaliação educacional e Produção cientifica. Por meio desse exemplo, o artigo demonstra a utilidade da ToS para a organização da pesquisa bibliográfica.Unicamp; Uniso2019-05-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/361210.1590/s1414-40772019000100005Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2019)Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; v. 24 n. 1 (2019)1982-57651414-4077reponame:Avaliação (Campinas. Online)instname:Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)instacron:UNISOporhttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/3612/3221Copyright (c) 2019 Avaliação - Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superiorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPatrus, RobertoSilva, Vinícius Tolentino Oliveira e2019-05-08T22:15:35Zoai:ojs.periodicos.uniso.br:article/3612Revistahttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/PUBhttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/oai||revistaavaliacao@uniso.br1982-57651414-4077opendoar:2019-05-08T22:15:35Avaliação (Campinas. Online) - Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example with A organização de uma revisão de literatura por meio da Tree of Science (Árvore da Ciência): um exemplo sobre a avaliação da pós-graduação |
title |
The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example with |
spellingShingle |
The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example with Patrus, Roberto |
title_short |
The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example with |
title_full |
The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example with |
title_fullStr |
The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example with |
title_full_unstemmed |
The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example with |
title_sort |
The review of literature through the Tree of Science: an example with |
author |
Patrus, Roberto |
author_facet |
Patrus, Roberto Silva, Vinícius Tolentino Oliveira e |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Vinícius Tolentino Oliveira e |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Patrus, Roberto Silva, Vinícius Tolentino Oliveira e |
description |
The advent of the search for articles through the Web has made bibliographic research faster and more economical. Difficult, however, is to organize the huge amount of papers that return from the search. Although there are innumerable articles on the methods and techniques of research, there are few papers about techniques of literature review. Faced with this theoretical gap and the practical difficulty of master's and doctoral students in organizing the literature review in their academic works, this paper aims to present a useful tool for the organization of literature review of theses and dissertations: the Tree of Science (ToS). With this feature, researchers search the Web of Science (WOS) databases and create a text file with the selected references. Then, by submitting this file to ToS, the site constructs a tree, using graph theory concepts, through the analysis of the citation networks. The tree classifies the references found in three levels: root, which gathers the seminal articles; trunk, which aggregates structuring articles; and leaves, which indicate the recent articles. It is up to the researcher to design the branches, that means the approaches in which the articles are located. As a way to bring an example of the use of the ToS tool, we search for the terms "Evaluation" and "Postgraduate". Our review organized four perspectives (branches): Postgraduate Evaluation / Capes, Productivism, Educational Evaluation, and Scientific Production. Through this example, the article demonstrates the usefulness of ToS for the organization of bibliographic research. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-05-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/3612 10.1590/s1414-40772019000100005 |
url |
https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/3612 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/s1414-40772019000100005 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/3612/3221 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Avaliação - Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Avaliação - Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unicamp; Uniso |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unicamp; Uniso |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2019) Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; v. 24 n. 1 (2019) 1982-5765 1414-4077 reponame:Avaliação (Campinas. Online) instname:Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO) instacron:UNISO |
instname_str |
Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO) |
instacron_str |
UNISO |
institution |
UNISO |
reponame_str |
Avaliação (Campinas. Online) |
collection |
Avaliação (Campinas. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação (Campinas. Online) - Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaavaliacao@uniso.br |
_version_ |
1800219609182240768 |