Notes on so-called "climate litigation" in Germany: The Lliuya V. Rwe Case

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sarlet, Ingo Wolfgang
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Wedy, Gabriel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/24027
Resumo: The widespread and increasingly developed climate change law has also led to an increase in of litigation in the judicial, administrative, arbitration sphere, both in terms of the domestic law of States, and in the scope of public and private international law. In this sense, the analysis of concrete cases, in the light of judicial and non-judicial precedents, is fundamental, as it is necessary for the development of both a theory and an effective practice of climate litigation. Among the countries that stand out most historically in terms of legislation, literature and jurisprudence in relation to the protection of the environment, unequivocally Germany occupies the top position. Several climate disputes and respective judicial decisions have deserved a close look from external observers with a view to their analysis from a comparative point of view. In the present essay, what is intended is to present and discuss is one of the climate litigation case that has gained the most notoriety, namely, the Lliuya v. RWE, the main object of the present study and which is sought to be presented and analyzed here, from the perspective of its relevance for good climate litigation. Furthermore, such an analysis will be carried out by inserting the precedent mentioned in the broader context of environmental law and environmental litigation in Germany.
id UNOESC-1_2da1e57abb716515fe5ed347ea3aaf60
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/24027
network_acronym_str UNOESC-1
network_name_str Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
repository_id_str
spelling Notes on so-called "climate litigation" in Germany: The Lliuya V. Rwe CaseNotas sobre os assim chamados “litígios climáticos” na Alemanha – O Caso Lliuya Vs. RweEnvironmental LawClimate ChangeClimate LitigationGermanyDireito AmbientalMudanças ClimáticasLitigância ClimáticaAlemanhaThe widespread and increasingly developed climate change law has also led to an increase in of litigation in the judicial, administrative, arbitration sphere, both in terms of the domestic law of States, and in the scope of public and private international law. In this sense, the analysis of concrete cases, in the light of judicial and non-judicial precedents, is fundamental, as it is necessary for the development of both a theory and an effective practice of climate litigation. Among the countries that stand out most historically in terms of legislation, literature and jurisprudence in relation to the protection of the environment, unequivocally Germany occupies the top position. Several climate disputes and respective judicial decisions have deserved a close look from external observers with a view to their analysis from a comparative point of view. In the present essay, what is intended is to present and discuss is one of the climate litigation case that has gained the most notoriety, namely, the Lliuya v. RWE, the main object of the present study and which is sought to be presented and analyzed here, from the perspective of its relevance for good climate litigation. Furthermore, such an analysis will be carried out by inserting the precedent mentioned in the broader context of environmental law and environmental litigation in Germany.O amplamente difundido e cada vez mais desenvolvido direito das mudanças climáticas, tem levado também a um incremento do número de litígios em esfera judicial, administrativa, arbitral, seja no plano do direito interno dos Estados, seja no âmbito do direito internacional público e privado. Nesse sentido, a análise de casos concretos, à luz de precedentes judiciais e não judiciais se revela fundamental, porquanto necessária ao desenvolvimento, tanto de uma teoria, quanto de uma prática eficaz da litigância ambiental. Dentre os países que mais se destacam historicamente em termos de legislação, literatura e jurisprudência relativamente à proteção do ambiente, inequivocamente a Alemanha ocupa posição cimeira. Diversos litígios climáticos e respectivas decisões judiciais têm merecido um olhar atento dos observadores externos com vistas à sua análise do ponto de vista comparativo. No presente texto, o que se pretende é apresentar e discutir é uma das demandas judiciais climáticas que mais ganhou notoriedade, designadamente, o caso Lliuya v. RWE, objeto precípuo do presente estudo e que aqui se procura apresentar e analisar, na perspectiva de sua relevância para uma boa litigância climática. Outrossim, tal análise será levada a efeito mediante a inserção do precedente referido no contexto mais alargado do direito ambiental e da litigância ambiental na Alemanha.Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC2020-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/2402710.18593/ejjl.24027Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 21 Nr. 1 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 277-296Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 277-296Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 277-296Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 277-296Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 21 n. 1 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 277-2962179-79431519-5899reponame:Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Lawinstname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)instacron:UNOESCporhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/24027/14490https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/24027/14492Copyright (c) 2020 Ingo Wolfgang Sarletinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSarlet, Ingo WolfgangWedy, Gabriel2020-10-16T20:18:44Zoai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/24027Revistahttps://portalperiodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/indexhttp://editora.unoesc.edu.br/index.php/espacojuridico/oaieditora@unoesc.edu.br||ejjl@unoesc.edu.br2179-79431519-5899opendoar:2020-10-16T20:18:44Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Notes on so-called "climate litigation" in Germany: The Lliuya V. Rwe Case
Notas sobre os assim chamados “litígios climáticos” na Alemanha – O Caso Lliuya Vs. Rwe
title Notes on so-called "climate litigation" in Germany: The Lliuya V. Rwe Case
spellingShingle Notes on so-called "climate litigation" in Germany: The Lliuya V. Rwe Case
Sarlet, Ingo Wolfgang
Environmental Law
Climate Change
Climate Litigation
Germany
Direito Ambiental
Mudanças Climáticas
Litigância Climática
Alemanha
title_short Notes on so-called "climate litigation" in Germany: The Lliuya V. Rwe Case
title_full Notes on so-called "climate litigation" in Germany: The Lliuya V. Rwe Case
title_fullStr Notes on so-called "climate litigation" in Germany: The Lliuya V. Rwe Case
title_full_unstemmed Notes on so-called "climate litigation" in Germany: The Lliuya V. Rwe Case
title_sort Notes on so-called "climate litigation" in Germany: The Lliuya V. Rwe Case
author Sarlet, Ingo Wolfgang
author_facet Sarlet, Ingo Wolfgang
Wedy, Gabriel
author_role author
author2 Wedy, Gabriel
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sarlet, Ingo Wolfgang
Wedy, Gabriel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Environmental Law
Climate Change
Climate Litigation
Germany
Direito Ambiental
Mudanças Climáticas
Litigância Climática
Alemanha
topic Environmental Law
Climate Change
Climate Litigation
Germany
Direito Ambiental
Mudanças Climáticas
Litigância Climática
Alemanha
description The widespread and increasingly developed climate change law has also led to an increase in of litigation in the judicial, administrative, arbitration sphere, both in terms of the domestic law of States, and in the scope of public and private international law. In this sense, the analysis of concrete cases, in the light of judicial and non-judicial precedents, is fundamental, as it is necessary for the development of both a theory and an effective practice of climate litigation. Among the countries that stand out most historically in terms of legislation, literature and jurisprudence in relation to the protection of the environment, unequivocally Germany occupies the top position. Several climate disputes and respective judicial decisions have deserved a close look from external observers with a view to their analysis from a comparative point of view. In the present essay, what is intended is to present and discuss is one of the climate litigation case that has gained the most notoriety, namely, the Lliuya v. RWE, the main object of the present study and which is sought to be presented and analyzed here, from the perspective of its relevance for good climate litigation. Furthermore, such an analysis will be carried out by inserting the precedent mentioned in the broader context of environmental law and environmental litigation in Germany.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/24027
10.18593/ejjl.24027
url https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/24027
identifier_str_mv 10.18593/ejjl.24027
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/24027/14490
https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/24027/14492
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Ingo Wolfgang Sarlet
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Ingo Wolfgang Sarlet
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 21 Nr. 1 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 277-296
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 277-296
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 277-296
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 277-296
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 21 n. 1 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 277-296
2179-7943
1519-5899
reponame:Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
instname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)
instacron:UNOESC
instname_str Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)
instacron_str UNOESC
institution UNOESC
reponame_str Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
collection Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editora@unoesc.edu.br||ejjl@unoesc.edu.br
_version_ 1800220447456886784