School for all and for each one: proposal of synthesis between collective plan and individualized plan
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Roteiro (Joaçaba. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/roteiro/article/view/27402 |
Resumo: | The guarantee of access in non-restrictive school environments, with equal opportunities, is one of the premises of the inclusion politics. Such guarantee, according to the vygotskyan perspective, can be also taken as alternative to development, considering that the school is the environment whose practices can culminate in learning of disable students. Vygotsky lived in a different cultural and historical context, but his theory principles concerning the disabled people development could be guiding to an inclusive school proposal. The present article was instigated by the vygotskyan proposition of dialectic synthesis between the standard education and the specialized education, highlighting the collaborative work in inclusive school. It aims a proposal of synthesis between the individualized planning and the collective planning, organized, respectively, in proposals as the Individualized Education Plan (IEP) and the Universal Design for Learning (UDL). It is configured as a theoretic essay that searches approaches between Vygotsky works and the education organization forms in the inclusive perspective. Rather than polarizing the different education planning designs, it comprises the potential of a collaborative planning proposal, that aggregates both the collective (such as the UDL) and the individualized (such as the IEP) in order to construct synthesis that overcome limitations, preserving the nature of each one of these methodological approaches. Therefore, we present planning guidelines, from a collaborative perspective, that is collective and individualized, as construction of the dialectical synthesis. |
id |
UNOESC-3_570f13b38b289414284ef36aed34c9b8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/27402 |
network_acronym_str |
UNOESC-3 |
network_name_str |
Roteiro (Joaçaba. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
School for all and for each one: proposal of synthesis between collective plan and individualized planEscuela para todos y cada uno: propuesta de síntesis entre planificación colectiva y planificación individualizadaEscola para todos e cada um: proposta de síntese entre planejamento coletivo e planejamento individualizadoEscola para todos e cada um: proposta de síntese entre planejamento coletivo e planejamento individualizadoEducação inclusivaDesenho Universal para a AprendizagemPlanejamento Educacional IndividualizadoVigotskiEducación inclusivaDiseño Universal para el AprendizajePlanificación IndividualizadaVigotskiInclusive educationUniversal Design for LearningIndividualized Education PlanVigotskiThe guarantee of access in non-restrictive school environments, with equal opportunities, is one of the premises of the inclusion politics. Such guarantee, according to the vygotskyan perspective, can be also taken as alternative to development, considering that the school is the environment whose practices can culminate in learning of disable students. Vygotsky lived in a different cultural and historical context, but his theory principles concerning the disabled people development could be guiding to an inclusive school proposal. The present article was instigated by the vygotskyan proposition of dialectic synthesis between the standard education and the specialized education, highlighting the collaborative work in inclusive school. It aims a proposal of synthesis between the individualized planning and the collective planning, organized, respectively, in proposals as the Individualized Education Plan (IEP) and the Universal Design for Learning (UDL). It is configured as a theoretic essay that searches approaches between Vygotsky works and the education organization forms in the inclusive perspective. Rather than polarizing the different education planning designs, it comprises the potential of a collaborative planning proposal, that aggregates both the collective (such as the UDL) and the individualized (such as the IEP) in order to construct synthesis that overcome limitations, preserving the nature of each one of these methodological approaches. Therefore, we present planning guidelines, from a collaborative perspective, that is collective and individualized, as construction of the dialectical synthesis.La garantía de acceso en ambientes escolares no restrictivos, con igualdad de oportunidades, es una de las premisas de las políticas de inclusión. Esa garantía, en la perspectiva vygotskiana, también puede tomarse como una alternativa al desarrollo, considerando que la escuela es un espacio cuyas prácticas pueden culminar en el aprendizaje para los estudiantes con discapacidad. Vygotski vivió en un contexto histórico y cultural diferente, pero los principios de su teoría acerca del desarrollo de las personas con discapacidad pueden orientar la propuesta de una escuela inclusiva. Este artículo tiene su origen en la proposición vygotskiana de síntesis dialéctica entre la educación común y la educación especializada, destacando el trabajo colaborativo en la escuela inclusiva. Posee como objetivo una propuesta se síntesis entre la planificación individualizada y la planificación colectiva, organizados, respectivamente, en propuestas como la Planificación Educacional Individualizada (PEI) y el Diseño Universal para el Aprendizaje (DUA). Se configura como un ensayo teórico que busca acercarse por medio de los escritos de Vygotski y las formas de organización de la enseñanza desde una perspectiva inclusiva. En lugar de polarizar los distintos diseños de planificación de la enseñanza, entendemos el potencial de una propuesta de planificación colaborativa, que sume tanto lo colectivo (como el DUA) como lo individual (como el PEI) para construir una síntesis que sobrepase a las limitaciones, preservando la esencia de cada uno de estos enfoques metodológicos. De esta forma, se presentan directrices para la planificación, desde una perspectiva colaborativa, que es colectiva e individualizada, como construcción de la síntesis dialéctica.A garantia de acesso em ambientes escolares não restritivos, com igualdade de oportunidades, é uma das premissas das políticas de inclusão. Tal garantia, na perspectiva vigotskiana, pode ser também tomada como alternativa ao desenvolvimento, considerando ser a escola um espaço cujas práticas podem culminar em aprendizagem para estudantes com deficiência. Vigotski viveu noutro contexto histórico e cultural, contudo, os princípios da sua teoria acerca do desenvolvimento das pessoas com deficiência podem ser orientadores para uma proposta de escola inclusiva. Este artigo é desencadeado pela proposição vigotskiana de síntese dialética entre o ensino comum e o ensino especializado, destacando o trabalho colaborativo na escola inclusiva. Tem como objetivo propor uma síntese entre o planejamento individualizado e o planejamento coletivo, organizados, respectivamente, em propostas, como o Planejamento Educacional Individualizado (PEI) e o Desenho Universal para a Aprendizagem (DUA). Configura-se como um ensaio teórico que busca aproximações entre os escritos de Vigotski e as formas de organização do ensino na perspectiva inclusiva. Ao invés de polarizar os diferentes designs de planejamento do ensino, compreende-se o potencial de uma proposta de planejamento colaborativa, que agregue tanto o coletivo (como o DUA) quanto o individual (como o PEI) para a construção de síntese que supere limitações, preservando a essência de cada uma dessas abordagens metodológicas. Desse modo, apresentam-se orientações para o planejamento, que é coletivo e individualizado, a partir de uma perspectiva colaborativa, como construção da síntese dialética.Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina2022-05-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/roteiro/article/view/2740210.18593/r.v47.27402Roteiro; Vol. 47 (2022): Roteiro; e27402Roteiro; Vol. 47 (2022): Roteiro; e27402Roteiro; Vol. 47 (2022): Roteiro; e27402Roteiro; v. 47 (2022): Roteiro; e27402Roteiro; Vol. 47 (2022): Roteiro; e274022177-60590104-431110.18593/r.v47reponame:Roteiro (Joaçaba. Online)instname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)instacron:UNOESCporhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/roteiro/article/view/27402/17389https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/roteiro/article/view/27402/17390Copyright (c) 2022 Adriane Cenci, Amélia Rota Borges de Bastoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCenci, AdrianeBastos, Amélia Rota Borges de2023-06-13T18:50:34Zoai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/27402Revistahttps://portalperiodicos.unoesc.edu.br/roteirohttps://portalperiodicos.unoesc.edu.br/roteiro/oairoteiro@unoesc.edu.br||editora@unoesc.edu.br||roteiro@unoesc.edu.br|| debora.pereira@unoesc.edu.br2177-60590104-4311opendoar:2023-06-13T18:50:34Roteiro (Joaçaba. Online) - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
School for all and for each one: proposal of synthesis between collective plan and individualized plan Escuela para todos y cada uno: propuesta de síntesis entre planificación colectiva y planificación individualizada Escola para todos e cada um: proposta de síntese entre planejamento coletivo e planejamento individualizado Escola para todos e cada um: proposta de síntese entre planejamento coletivo e planejamento individualizado |
title |
School for all and for each one: proposal of synthesis between collective plan and individualized plan |
spellingShingle |
School for all and for each one: proposal of synthesis between collective plan and individualized plan Cenci, Adriane Educação inclusiva Desenho Universal para a Aprendizagem Planejamento Educacional Individualizado Vigotski Educación inclusiva Diseño Universal para el Aprendizaje Planificación Individualizada Vigotski Inclusive education Universal Design for Learning Individualized Education Plan Vigotski |
title_short |
School for all and for each one: proposal of synthesis between collective plan and individualized plan |
title_full |
School for all and for each one: proposal of synthesis between collective plan and individualized plan |
title_fullStr |
School for all and for each one: proposal of synthesis between collective plan and individualized plan |
title_full_unstemmed |
School for all and for each one: proposal of synthesis between collective plan and individualized plan |
title_sort |
School for all and for each one: proposal of synthesis between collective plan and individualized plan |
author |
Cenci, Adriane |
author_facet |
Cenci, Adriane Bastos, Amélia Rota Borges de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bastos, Amélia Rota Borges de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cenci, Adriane Bastos, Amélia Rota Borges de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Educação inclusiva Desenho Universal para a Aprendizagem Planejamento Educacional Individualizado Vigotski Educación inclusiva Diseño Universal para el Aprendizaje Planificación Individualizada Vigotski Inclusive education Universal Design for Learning Individualized Education Plan Vigotski |
topic |
Educação inclusiva Desenho Universal para a Aprendizagem Planejamento Educacional Individualizado Vigotski Educación inclusiva Diseño Universal para el Aprendizaje Planificación Individualizada Vigotski Inclusive education Universal Design for Learning Individualized Education Plan Vigotski |
description |
The guarantee of access in non-restrictive school environments, with equal opportunities, is one of the premises of the inclusion politics. Such guarantee, according to the vygotskyan perspective, can be also taken as alternative to development, considering that the school is the environment whose practices can culminate in learning of disable students. Vygotsky lived in a different cultural and historical context, but his theory principles concerning the disabled people development could be guiding to an inclusive school proposal. The present article was instigated by the vygotskyan proposition of dialectic synthesis between the standard education and the specialized education, highlighting the collaborative work in inclusive school. It aims a proposal of synthesis between the individualized planning and the collective planning, organized, respectively, in proposals as the Individualized Education Plan (IEP) and the Universal Design for Learning (UDL). It is configured as a theoretic essay that searches approaches between Vygotsky works and the education organization forms in the inclusive perspective. Rather than polarizing the different education planning designs, it comprises the potential of a collaborative planning proposal, that aggregates both the collective (such as the UDL) and the individualized (such as the IEP) in order to construct synthesis that overcome limitations, preserving the nature of each one of these methodological approaches. Therefore, we present planning guidelines, from a collaborative perspective, that is collective and individualized, as construction of the dialectical synthesis. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/roteiro/article/view/27402 10.18593/r.v47.27402 |
url |
https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/roteiro/article/view/27402 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18593/r.v47.27402 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/roteiro/article/view/27402/17389 https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/roteiro/article/view/27402/17390 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Adriane Cenci, Amélia Rota Borges de Bastos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Adriane Cenci, Amélia Rota Borges de Bastos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Roteiro; Vol. 47 (2022): Roteiro; e27402 Roteiro; Vol. 47 (2022): Roteiro; e27402 Roteiro; Vol. 47 (2022): Roteiro; e27402 Roteiro; v. 47 (2022): Roteiro; e27402 Roteiro; Vol. 47 (2022): Roteiro; e27402 2177-6059 0104-4311 10.18593/r.v47 reponame:Roteiro (Joaçaba. Online) instname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC) instacron:UNOESC |
instname_str |
Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC) |
instacron_str |
UNOESC |
institution |
UNOESC |
reponame_str |
Roteiro (Joaçaba. Online) |
collection |
Roteiro (Joaçaba. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Roteiro (Joaçaba. Online) - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
roteiro@unoesc.edu.br||editora@unoesc.edu.br||roteiro@unoesc.edu.br|| debora.pereira@unoesc.edu.br |
_version_ |
1800220532173438976 |