Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Felippelli, Gustavo [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Teixeira, Weslen Fabricio Pires [UNESP], Gomes, Lucas Vinicius Costa [UNESP], Maciel, Willian Giquelin [UNESP], Cruz, Breno Cayeiro [UNESP], Buzzulini, Carolina [UNESP], dos Santos, Thais Rabelo, Ferreira, Lorena Lopes, Soares, Vando Edésio, Rodrigues, Daniel Castro, Monteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveira, da Costa, Alvimar José [UNESP], Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101903
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223278
Resumo: Due to the scarcity of information regarding the control of Rhipicephalus microplus on bovines with different tick burdens, tick counts and the efficacy of a commercial spray formulation (aspersion bath with organophosphate + pyrethroid) were evaluated for animals with a low and high tick burdens for 35 days in a stall test. Thirty-two crossbreed Bos taurus indicus x Bos t. taurus experimentally infested with R. microplus larvae were divided into four groups: T01 high infestation control, T02 high infestation treated, T03 low infestation control, and T04 low infestation treated. The bovines were kept individually in pens and R. microplus females were collected daily. All data were statistically analyzed with a significance level of 5% (P ≤ 0.05). For linear regressions, variables with P≤0.05 and the highest coefficients of determination (R2 ≥ 0.70) were considered the best descriptors. The reliability level was 95%. Tick counts differed (P<0.0001) between T01 and T02 (high infestation control vs. treated), except at day 2 (P >0.05) post-treatment, and efficacy ranged from 85.2 to 50.6%. The number of collected engorged females was lower (P<0.0001) for T04 than for T03 (low infestation treated vs. control) animals from day 3 to 29, and efficacy ranged from 95.2 to 69.8%. In addition, tick burden and efficacy were negatively correlated for both the group of animals with a high tick burden (r = -0.5256; p = 0.0012; R² = 0.2762) and the group of animals with a low tick burden (r = -0.9817; p < 0.0001; R² = 0.9638). In conclusion, a high tick burden on bovines decreases the efficacy of the tested spray acaricide.
id UNSP_285935d377ecf7eb43937f1fecad9c1d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223278
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplusAspersion bathCattle tickChemical controlSpray acaricideTick burdenDue to the scarcity of information regarding the control of Rhipicephalus microplus on bovines with different tick burdens, tick counts and the efficacy of a commercial spray formulation (aspersion bath with organophosphate + pyrethroid) were evaluated for animals with a low and high tick burdens for 35 days in a stall test. Thirty-two crossbreed Bos taurus indicus x Bos t. taurus experimentally infested with R. microplus larvae were divided into four groups: T01 high infestation control, T02 high infestation treated, T03 low infestation control, and T04 low infestation treated. The bovines were kept individually in pens and R. microplus females were collected daily. All data were statistically analyzed with a significance level of 5% (P ≤ 0.05). For linear regressions, variables with P≤0.05 and the highest coefficients of determination (R2 ≥ 0.70) were considered the best descriptors. The reliability level was 95%. Tick counts differed (P<0.0001) between T01 and T02 (high infestation control vs. treated), except at day 2 (P >0.05) post-treatment, and efficacy ranged from 85.2 to 50.6%. The number of collected engorged females was lower (P<0.0001) for T04 than for T03 (low infestation treated vs. control) animals from day 3 to 29, and efficacy ranged from 95.2 to 69.8%. In addition, tick burden and efficacy were negatively correlated for both the group of animals with a high tick burden (r = -0.5256; p = 0.0012; R² = 0.2762) and the group of animals with a low tick burden (r = -0.9817; p < 0.0001; R² = 0.9638). In conclusion, a high tick burden on bovines decreases the efficacy of the tested spray acaricide.Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Universidade Estadual PaulistaUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e MucuriDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva Escola de Veterinária Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisUniversidade BrasilCentro de Parasitologia Veterinária Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia Universidade Federal de GoiásDepartamento de Biociências e Tecnologia Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública Universidade Federal de GoiásFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Universidade Estadual PaulistaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e MucuriUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)Universidade BrasilUniversidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)Felippelli, Gustavo [UNESP]Teixeira, Weslen Fabricio Pires [UNESP]Gomes, Lucas Vinicius Costa [UNESP]Maciel, Willian Giquelin [UNESP]Cruz, Breno Cayeiro [UNESP]Buzzulini, Carolina [UNESP]dos Santos, Thais RabeloFerreira, Lorena LopesSoares, Vando EdésioRodrigues, Daniel CastroMonteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveirada Costa, Alvimar José [UNESP]Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti2022-04-28T19:49:40Z2022-04-28T19:49:40Z2022-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101903Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, v. 13, n. 2, 2022.1877-96031877-959Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22327810.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.1019032-s2.0-85123019762Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengTicks and Tick-borne Diseasesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:49:40Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223278Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-28T19:49:40Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus
title Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus
spellingShingle Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus
Felippelli, Gustavo [UNESP]
Aspersion bath
Cattle tick
Chemical control
Spray acaricide
Tick burden
title_short Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus
title_full Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus
title_fullStr Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus
title_full_unstemmed Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus
title_sort Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus
author Felippelli, Gustavo [UNESP]
author_facet Felippelli, Gustavo [UNESP]
Teixeira, Weslen Fabricio Pires [UNESP]
Gomes, Lucas Vinicius Costa [UNESP]
Maciel, Willian Giquelin [UNESP]
Cruz, Breno Cayeiro [UNESP]
Buzzulini, Carolina [UNESP]
dos Santos, Thais Rabelo
Ferreira, Lorena Lopes
Soares, Vando Edésio
Rodrigues, Daniel Castro
Monteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveira
da Costa, Alvimar José [UNESP]
Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti
author_role author
author2 Teixeira, Weslen Fabricio Pires [UNESP]
Gomes, Lucas Vinicius Costa [UNESP]
Maciel, Willian Giquelin [UNESP]
Cruz, Breno Cayeiro [UNESP]
Buzzulini, Carolina [UNESP]
dos Santos, Thais Rabelo
Ferreira, Lorena Lopes
Soares, Vando Edésio
Rodrigues, Daniel Castro
Monteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveira
da Costa, Alvimar José [UNESP]
Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
Universidade Brasil
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Felippelli, Gustavo [UNESP]
Teixeira, Weslen Fabricio Pires [UNESP]
Gomes, Lucas Vinicius Costa [UNESP]
Maciel, Willian Giquelin [UNESP]
Cruz, Breno Cayeiro [UNESP]
Buzzulini, Carolina [UNESP]
dos Santos, Thais Rabelo
Ferreira, Lorena Lopes
Soares, Vando Edésio
Rodrigues, Daniel Castro
Monteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveira
da Costa, Alvimar José [UNESP]
Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aspersion bath
Cattle tick
Chemical control
Spray acaricide
Tick burden
topic Aspersion bath
Cattle tick
Chemical control
Spray acaricide
Tick burden
description Due to the scarcity of information regarding the control of Rhipicephalus microplus on bovines with different tick burdens, tick counts and the efficacy of a commercial spray formulation (aspersion bath with organophosphate + pyrethroid) were evaluated for animals with a low and high tick burdens for 35 days in a stall test. Thirty-two crossbreed Bos taurus indicus x Bos t. taurus experimentally infested with R. microplus larvae were divided into four groups: T01 high infestation control, T02 high infestation treated, T03 low infestation control, and T04 low infestation treated. The bovines were kept individually in pens and R. microplus females were collected daily. All data were statistically analyzed with a significance level of 5% (P ≤ 0.05). For linear regressions, variables with P≤0.05 and the highest coefficients of determination (R2 ≥ 0.70) were considered the best descriptors. The reliability level was 95%. Tick counts differed (P<0.0001) between T01 and T02 (high infestation control vs. treated), except at day 2 (P >0.05) post-treatment, and efficacy ranged from 85.2 to 50.6%. The number of collected engorged females was lower (P<0.0001) for T04 than for T03 (low infestation treated vs. control) animals from day 3 to 29, and efficacy ranged from 95.2 to 69.8%. In addition, tick burden and efficacy were negatively correlated for both the group of animals with a high tick burden (r = -0.5256; p = 0.0012; R² = 0.2762) and the group of animals with a low tick burden (r = -0.9817; p < 0.0001; R² = 0.9638). In conclusion, a high tick burden on bovines decreases the efficacy of the tested spray acaricide.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-28T19:49:40Z
2022-04-28T19:49:40Z
2022-03-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101903
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, v. 13, n. 2, 2022.
1877-9603
1877-959X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223278
10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101903
2-s2.0-85123019762
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101903
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223278
identifier_str_mv Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, v. 13, n. 2, 2022.
1877-9603
1877-959X
10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101903
2-s2.0-85123019762
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797790345206956032