Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101903 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223278 |
Resumo: | Due to the scarcity of information regarding the control of Rhipicephalus microplus on bovines with different tick burdens, tick counts and the efficacy of a commercial spray formulation (aspersion bath with organophosphate + pyrethroid) were evaluated for animals with a low and high tick burdens for 35 days in a stall test. Thirty-two crossbreed Bos taurus indicus x Bos t. taurus experimentally infested with R. microplus larvae were divided into four groups: T01 high infestation control, T02 high infestation treated, T03 low infestation control, and T04 low infestation treated. The bovines were kept individually in pens and R. microplus females were collected daily. All data were statistically analyzed with a significance level of 5% (P ≤ 0.05). For linear regressions, variables with P≤0.05 and the highest coefficients of determination (R2 ≥ 0.70) were considered the best descriptors. The reliability level was 95%. Tick counts differed (P<0.0001) between T01 and T02 (high infestation control vs. treated), except at day 2 (P >0.05) post-treatment, and efficacy ranged from 85.2 to 50.6%. The number of collected engorged females was lower (P<0.0001) for T04 than for T03 (low infestation treated vs. control) animals from day 3 to 29, and efficacy ranged from 95.2 to 69.8%. In addition, tick burden and efficacy were negatively correlated for both the group of animals with a high tick burden (r = -0.5256; p = 0.0012; R² = 0.2762) and the group of animals with a low tick burden (r = -0.9817; p < 0.0001; R² = 0.9638). In conclusion, a high tick burden on bovines decreases the efficacy of the tested spray acaricide. |
id |
UNSP_285935d377ecf7eb43937f1fecad9c1d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223278 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplusAspersion bathCattle tickChemical controlSpray acaricideTick burdenDue to the scarcity of information regarding the control of Rhipicephalus microplus on bovines with different tick burdens, tick counts and the efficacy of a commercial spray formulation (aspersion bath with organophosphate + pyrethroid) were evaluated for animals with a low and high tick burdens for 35 days in a stall test. Thirty-two crossbreed Bos taurus indicus x Bos t. taurus experimentally infested with R. microplus larvae were divided into four groups: T01 high infestation control, T02 high infestation treated, T03 low infestation control, and T04 low infestation treated. The bovines were kept individually in pens and R. microplus females were collected daily. All data were statistically analyzed with a significance level of 5% (P ≤ 0.05). For linear regressions, variables with P≤0.05 and the highest coefficients of determination (R2 ≥ 0.70) were considered the best descriptors. The reliability level was 95%. Tick counts differed (P<0.0001) between T01 and T02 (high infestation control vs. treated), except at day 2 (P >0.05) post-treatment, and efficacy ranged from 85.2 to 50.6%. The number of collected engorged females was lower (P<0.0001) for T04 than for T03 (low infestation treated vs. control) animals from day 3 to 29, and efficacy ranged from 95.2 to 69.8%. In addition, tick burden and efficacy were negatively correlated for both the group of animals with a high tick burden (r = -0.5256; p = 0.0012; R² = 0.2762) and the group of animals with a low tick burden (r = -0.9817; p < 0.0001; R² = 0.9638). In conclusion, a high tick burden on bovines decreases the efficacy of the tested spray acaricide.Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Universidade Estadual PaulistaUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e MucuriDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva Escola de Veterinária Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisUniversidade BrasilCentro de Parasitologia Veterinária Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia Universidade Federal de GoiásDepartamento de Biociências e Tecnologia Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública Universidade Federal de GoiásFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Universidade Estadual PaulistaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e MucuriUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)Universidade BrasilUniversidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)Felippelli, Gustavo [UNESP]Teixeira, Weslen Fabricio Pires [UNESP]Gomes, Lucas Vinicius Costa [UNESP]Maciel, Willian Giquelin [UNESP]Cruz, Breno Cayeiro [UNESP]Buzzulini, Carolina [UNESP]dos Santos, Thais RabeloFerreira, Lorena LopesSoares, Vando EdésioRodrigues, Daniel CastroMonteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveirada Costa, Alvimar José [UNESP]Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti2022-04-28T19:49:40Z2022-04-28T19:49:40Z2022-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101903Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, v. 13, n. 2, 2022.1877-96031877-959Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22327810.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.1019032-s2.0-85123019762Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengTicks and Tick-borne Diseasesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:49:40Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223278Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:28:36.417517Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus |
title |
Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus |
spellingShingle |
Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus Felippelli, Gustavo [UNESP] Aspersion bath Cattle tick Chemical control Spray acaricide Tick burden |
title_short |
Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus |
title_full |
Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus |
title_fullStr |
Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus |
title_sort |
Tick infestation level interferes with spray formulation (organophosphate + pyrethroid) efficacy against Rhipicephalus microplus |
author |
Felippelli, Gustavo [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Felippelli, Gustavo [UNESP] Teixeira, Weslen Fabricio Pires [UNESP] Gomes, Lucas Vinicius Costa [UNESP] Maciel, Willian Giquelin [UNESP] Cruz, Breno Cayeiro [UNESP] Buzzulini, Carolina [UNESP] dos Santos, Thais Rabelo Ferreira, Lorena Lopes Soares, Vando Edésio Rodrigues, Daniel Castro Monteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveira da Costa, Alvimar José [UNESP] Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Teixeira, Weslen Fabricio Pires [UNESP] Gomes, Lucas Vinicius Costa [UNESP] Maciel, Willian Giquelin [UNESP] Cruz, Breno Cayeiro [UNESP] Buzzulini, Carolina [UNESP] dos Santos, Thais Rabelo Ferreira, Lorena Lopes Soares, Vando Edésio Rodrigues, Daniel Castro Monteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveira da Costa, Alvimar José [UNESP] Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) Universidade Brasil Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Felippelli, Gustavo [UNESP] Teixeira, Weslen Fabricio Pires [UNESP] Gomes, Lucas Vinicius Costa [UNESP] Maciel, Willian Giquelin [UNESP] Cruz, Breno Cayeiro [UNESP] Buzzulini, Carolina [UNESP] dos Santos, Thais Rabelo Ferreira, Lorena Lopes Soares, Vando Edésio Rodrigues, Daniel Castro Monteiro, Caio Márcio de Oliveira da Costa, Alvimar José [UNESP] Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aspersion bath Cattle tick Chemical control Spray acaricide Tick burden |
topic |
Aspersion bath Cattle tick Chemical control Spray acaricide Tick burden |
description |
Due to the scarcity of information regarding the control of Rhipicephalus microplus on bovines with different tick burdens, tick counts and the efficacy of a commercial spray formulation (aspersion bath with organophosphate + pyrethroid) were evaluated for animals with a low and high tick burdens for 35 days in a stall test. Thirty-two crossbreed Bos taurus indicus x Bos t. taurus experimentally infested with R. microplus larvae were divided into four groups: T01 high infestation control, T02 high infestation treated, T03 low infestation control, and T04 low infestation treated. The bovines were kept individually in pens and R. microplus females were collected daily. All data were statistically analyzed with a significance level of 5% (P ≤ 0.05). For linear regressions, variables with P≤0.05 and the highest coefficients of determination (R2 ≥ 0.70) were considered the best descriptors. The reliability level was 95%. Tick counts differed (P<0.0001) between T01 and T02 (high infestation control vs. treated), except at day 2 (P >0.05) post-treatment, and efficacy ranged from 85.2 to 50.6%. The number of collected engorged females was lower (P<0.0001) for T04 than for T03 (low infestation treated vs. control) animals from day 3 to 29, and efficacy ranged from 95.2 to 69.8%. In addition, tick burden and efficacy were negatively correlated for both the group of animals with a high tick burden (r = -0.5256; p = 0.0012; R² = 0.2762) and the group of animals with a low tick burden (r = -0.9817; p < 0.0001; R² = 0.9638). In conclusion, a high tick burden on bovines decreases the efficacy of the tested spray acaricide. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-28T19:49:40Z 2022-04-28T19:49:40Z 2022-03-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101903 Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, v. 13, n. 2, 2022. 1877-9603 1877-959X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223278 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101903 2-s2.0-85123019762 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101903 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223278 |
identifier_str_mv |
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, v. 13, n. 2, 2022. 1877-9603 1877-959X 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101903 2-s2.0-85123019762 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129524191199232 |