Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2015.04.009 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/131626 |
Resumo: | To compare the use of analgesia versus neonatologists' perception regarding analgesic use in painful procedures in the years 2001, 2006, and 2011. This was a prospective cohort study of all newborns admitted to four university neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) during one month in 2001, 2006, and 2011. The frequency of analgesic prescription for painful procedures was evaluated. Of the 202 neonatologists, 188 answered a questionnaire giving their opinion on the intensity of pain during lumbar puncture (LP), tracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation (MV), and postoperative period (PO) using a 10-cm visual analogic scale (VAS; pain >3cm). For LP, 12% (2001), 43% (2006), and 36% (2011) were performed using analgesia. Among the neonatologists, 40-50% reported VAS >3 for LP in all study periods. For intubation, 30% received analgesia in the study periods, and 35% (2001), 55% (2006), and 73% (2011) of the neonatologists reported VAS >3 and would prescribe analgesia for this procedure. As for MV, 45% (2001), 64% (2006), and 48% (2011) of patient-days were under analgesia; 56% (2001), 57% (2006), and 26% (2011) of neonatologists reported VAS >3 and said they would use analgesia during MV. For the first three PO days, 37% (2001), 78% (2006), and 89% (2011) of the patients received analgesia and more than 90% of neonatologists reported VAS >3 for major surgeries. Despite an increase in the medical perception of neonatal pain and in analgesic use during painful procedures, the gap between clinical practice and neonatologist perception of analgesia need did not change during the ten-year period. |
id |
UNSP_35be379b7c30e809b3d95c5b83988bdf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/131626 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period?To compare the use of analgesia versus neonatologists' perception regarding analgesic use in painful procedures in the years 2001, 2006, and 2011. This was a prospective cohort study of all newborns admitted to four university neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) during one month in 2001, 2006, and 2011. The frequency of analgesic prescription for painful procedures was evaluated. Of the 202 neonatologists, 188 answered a questionnaire giving their opinion on the intensity of pain during lumbar puncture (LP), tracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation (MV), and postoperative period (PO) using a 10-cm visual analogic scale (VAS; pain >3cm). For LP, 12% (2001), 43% (2006), and 36% (2011) were performed using analgesia. Among the neonatologists, 40-50% reported VAS >3 for LP in all study periods. For intubation, 30% received analgesia in the study periods, and 35% (2001), 55% (2006), and 73% (2011) of the neonatologists reported VAS >3 and would prescribe analgesia for this procedure. As for MV, 45% (2001), 64% (2006), and 48% (2011) of patient-days were under analgesia; 56% (2001), 57% (2006), and 26% (2011) of neonatologists reported VAS >3 and said they would use analgesia during MV. For the first three PO days, 37% (2001), 78% (2006), and 89% (2011) of the patients received analgesia and more than 90% of neonatologists reported VAS >3 for major surgeries. Despite an increase in the medical perception of neonatal pain and in analgesic use during painful procedures, the gap between clinical practice and neonatologist perception of analgesia need did not change during the ten-year period.Discipline of Neonatal Pediatrics, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.Department of Pediatrics, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (FMB), Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.Department of Pediatrics, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Service of Neonatology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.Department of Pediatrics, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.Department of Pediatrics, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil; Apoio a Assistência e Pesquisa, Hospital da Mulher Prof. Dr. Aristodemo Pinotti (CAISM), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.Division of Neonatology, Hospital da Mulher Prof. Dr. José Aristodemo Pinotti, Centro de Atenção Integral à Saúde da Mulher (CAISM), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.Discipline of Neonatal Pediatrics, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: ruthgbr@netpoint.com.br.Department of Pediatrics, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (FMB), Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.Elsevier B. V.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Prestes, Ana Claudia Yoshikumide Cássia Xavier Balda, RitaSilva Dos Santos, Gianni Marade Souza Rugolo, Ligia Maria Suppo [UNESP]Bentlin, Maria Regina [UNESP]Magalhães, MauricioPachi, Paulo RobertoMarba, Sergio Tadeu Martinsde Siqueira Caldas, Jamil PedroGuinsburg, Ruth2015-12-07T15:38:58Z2015-12-07T15:38:58Z2015-10-06info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2015.04.009Jornal De Pediatria, 2015.1678-4782http://hdl.handle.net/11449/13162610.1016/j.jped.2015.04.009S0021-75572016000100088S0021-75572016000100088.pdf255963740071954326453514PubMedreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJornal De Pediatriainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-03T13:46:38Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/131626Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-03T13:46:38Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period? |
title |
Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period? |
spellingShingle |
Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period? Prestes, Ana Claudia Yoshikumi |
title_short |
Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period? |
title_full |
Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period? |
title_fullStr |
Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period? |
title_sort |
Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period? |
author |
Prestes, Ana Claudia Yoshikumi |
author_facet |
Prestes, Ana Claudia Yoshikumi de Cássia Xavier Balda, Rita Silva Dos Santos, Gianni Mara de Souza Rugolo, Ligia Maria Suppo [UNESP] Bentlin, Maria Regina [UNESP] Magalhães, Mauricio Pachi, Paulo Roberto Marba, Sergio Tadeu Martins de Siqueira Caldas, Jamil Pedro Guinsburg, Ruth |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Cássia Xavier Balda, Rita Silva Dos Santos, Gianni Mara de Souza Rugolo, Ligia Maria Suppo [UNESP] Bentlin, Maria Regina [UNESP] Magalhães, Mauricio Pachi, Paulo Roberto Marba, Sergio Tadeu Martins de Siqueira Caldas, Jamil Pedro Guinsburg, Ruth |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP) Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Prestes, Ana Claudia Yoshikumi de Cássia Xavier Balda, Rita Silva Dos Santos, Gianni Mara de Souza Rugolo, Ligia Maria Suppo [UNESP] Bentlin, Maria Regina [UNESP] Magalhães, Mauricio Pachi, Paulo Roberto Marba, Sergio Tadeu Martins de Siqueira Caldas, Jamil Pedro Guinsburg, Ruth |
description |
To compare the use of analgesia versus neonatologists' perception regarding analgesic use in painful procedures in the years 2001, 2006, and 2011. This was a prospective cohort study of all newborns admitted to four university neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) during one month in 2001, 2006, and 2011. The frequency of analgesic prescription for painful procedures was evaluated. Of the 202 neonatologists, 188 answered a questionnaire giving their opinion on the intensity of pain during lumbar puncture (LP), tracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation (MV), and postoperative period (PO) using a 10-cm visual analogic scale (VAS; pain >3cm). For LP, 12% (2001), 43% (2006), and 36% (2011) were performed using analgesia. Among the neonatologists, 40-50% reported VAS >3 for LP in all study periods. For intubation, 30% received analgesia in the study periods, and 35% (2001), 55% (2006), and 73% (2011) of the neonatologists reported VAS >3 and would prescribe analgesia for this procedure. As for MV, 45% (2001), 64% (2006), and 48% (2011) of patient-days were under analgesia; 56% (2001), 57% (2006), and 26% (2011) of neonatologists reported VAS >3 and said they would use analgesia during MV. For the first three PO days, 37% (2001), 78% (2006), and 89% (2011) of the patients received analgesia and more than 90% of neonatologists reported VAS >3 for major surgeries. Despite an increase in the medical perception of neonatal pain and in analgesic use during painful procedures, the gap between clinical practice and neonatologist perception of analgesia need did not change during the ten-year period. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-07T15:38:58Z 2015-12-07T15:38:58Z 2015-10-06 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2015.04.009 Jornal De Pediatria, 2015. 1678-4782 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/131626 10.1016/j.jped.2015.04.009 S0021-75572016000100088 S0021-75572016000100088.pdf 2559637400719543 26453514 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2015.04.009 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/131626 |
identifier_str_mv |
Jornal De Pediatria, 2015. 1678-4782 10.1016/j.jped.2015.04.009 S0021-75572016000100088 S0021-75572016000100088.pdf 2559637400719543 26453514 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Jornal De Pediatria |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B. V. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B. V. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
PubMed reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1810021384293711872 |