Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Prestes, Ana Claudia Yoshikumi
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: de Cássia Xavier Balda, Rita, Silva Dos Santos, Gianni Mara, de Souza Rugolo, Ligia Maria Suppo [UNESP], Bentlin, Maria Regina [UNESP], Magalhães, Mauricio, Pachi, Paulo Roberto, Marba, Sergio Tadeu Martins, de Siqueira Caldas, Jamil Pedro, Guinsburg, Ruth
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2015.04.009
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/131626
Resumo: To compare the use of analgesia versus neonatologists' perception regarding analgesic use in painful procedures in the years 2001, 2006, and 2011. This was a prospective cohort study of all newborns admitted to four university neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) during one month in 2001, 2006, and 2011. The frequency of analgesic prescription for painful procedures was evaluated. Of the 202 neonatologists, 188 answered a questionnaire giving their opinion on the intensity of pain during lumbar puncture (LP), tracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation (MV), and postoperative period (PO) using a 10-cm visual analogic scale (VAS; pain >3cm). For LP, 12% (2001), 43% (2006), and 36% (2011) were performed using analgesia. Among the neonatologists, 40-50% reported VAS >3 for LP in all study periods. For intubation, 30% received analgesia in the study periods, and 35% (2001), 55% (2006), and 73% (2011) of the neonatologists reported VAS >3 and would prescribe analgesia for this procedure. As for MV, 45% (2001), 64% (2006), and 48% (2011) of patient-days were under analgesia; 56% (2001), 57% (2006), and 26% (2011) of neonatologists reported VAS >3 and said they would use analgesia during MV. For the first three PO days, 37% (2001), 78% (2006), and 89% (2011) of the patients received analgesia and more than 90% of neonatologists reported VAS >3 for major surgeries. Despite an increase in the medical perception of neonatal pain and in analgesic use during painful procedures, the gap between clinical practice and neonatologist perception of analgesia need did not change during the ten-year period.
id UNSP_35be379b7c30e809b3d95c5b83988bdf
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/131626
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period?To compare the use of analgesia versus neonatologists' perception regarding analgesic use in painful procedures in the years 2001, 2006, and 2011. This was a prospective cohort study of all newborns admitted to four university neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) during one month in 2001, 2006, and 2011. The frequency of analgesic prescription for painful procedures was evaluated. Of the 202 neonatologists, 188 answered a questionnaire giving their opinion on the intensity of pain during lumbar puncture (LP), tracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation (MV), and postoperative period (PO) using a 10-cm visual analogic scale (VAS; pain >3cm). For LP, 12% (2001), 43% (2006), and 36% (2011) were performed using analgesia. Among the neonatologists, 40-50% reported VAS >3 for LP in all study periods. For intubation, 30% received analgesia in the study periods, and 35% (2001), 55% (2006), and 73% (2011) of the neonatologists reported VAS >3 and would prescribe analgesia for this procedure. As for MV, 45% (2001), 64% (2006), and 48% (2011) of patient-days were under analgesia; 56% (2001), 57% (2006), and 26% (2011) of neonatologists reported VAS >3 and said they would use analgesia during MV. For the first three PO days, 37% (2001), 78% (2006), and 89% (2011) of the patients received analgesia and more than 90% of neonatologists reported VAS >3 for major surgeries. Despite an increase in the medical perception of neonatal pain and in analgesic use during painful procedures, the gap between clinical practice and neonatologist perception of analgesia need did not change during the ten-year period.Discipline of Neonatal Pediatrics, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.Department of Pediatrics, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (FMB), Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.Department of Pediatrics, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Service of Neonatology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.Department of Pediatrics, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.Department of Pediatrics, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil; Apoio a Assistência e Pesquisa, Hospital da Mulher Prof. Dr. Aristodemo Pinotti (CAISM), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.Division of Neonatology, Hospital da Mulher Prof. Dr. José Aristodemo Pinotti, Centro de Atenção Integral à Saúde da Mulher (CAISM), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.Discipline of Neonatal Pediatrics, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: ruthgbr@netpoint.com.br.Department of Pediatrics, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (FMB), Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.Elsevier B. V.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Prestes, Ana Claudia Yoshikumide Cássia Xavier Balda, RitaSilva Dos Santos, Gianni Marade Souza Rugolo, Ligia Maria Suppo [UNESP]Bentlin, Maria Regina [UNESP]Magalhães, MauricioPachi, Paulo RobertoMarba, Sergio Tadeu Martinsde Siqueira Caldas, Jamil PedroGuinsburg, Ruth2015-12-07T15:38:58Z2015-12-07T15:38:58Z2015-10-06info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2015.04.009Jornal De Pediatria, 2015.1678-4782http://hdl.handle.net/11449/13162610.1016/j.jped.2015.04.009S0021-75572016000100088S0021-75572016000100088.pdf255963740071954326453514PubMedreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJornal De Pediatriainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-03T13:46:38Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/131626Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-03T13:46:38Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period?
title Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period?
spellingShingle Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period?
Prestes, Ana Claudia Yoshikumi
title_short Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period?
title_full Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period?
title_fullStr Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period?
title_full_unstemmed Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period?
title_sort Painful procedures and analgesia in the NICU: what has changed in the medical perception and practice in a ten-year period?
author Prestes, Ana Claudia Yoshikumi
author_facet Prestes, Ana Claudia Yoshikumi
de Cássia Xavier Balda, Rita
Silva Dos Santos, Gianni Mara
de Souza Rugolo, Ligia Maria Suppo [UNESP]
Bentlin, Maria Regina [UNESP]
Magalhães, Mauricio
Pachi, Paulo Roberto
Marba, Sergio Tadeu Martins
de Siqueira Caldas, Jamil Pedro
Guinsburg, Ruth
author_role author
author2 de Cássia Xavier Balda, Rita
Silva Dos Santos, Gianni Mara
de Souza Rugolo, Ligia Maria Suppo [UNESP]
Bentlin, Maria Regina [UNESP]
Magalhães, Mauricio
Pachi, Paulo Roberto
Marba, Sergio Tadeu Martins
de Siqueira Caldas, Jamil Pedro
Guinsburg, Ruth
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Prestes, Ana Claudia Yoshikumi
de Cássia Xavier Balda, Rita
Silva Dos Santos, Gianni Mara
de Souza Rugolo, Ligia Maria Suppo [UNESP]
Bentlin, Maria Regina [UNESP]
Magalhães, Mauricio
Pachi, Paulo Roberto
Marba, Sergio Tadeu Martins
de Siqueira Caldas, Jamil Pedro
Guinsburg, Ruth
description To compare the use of analgesia versus neonatologists' perception regarding analgesic use in painful procedures in the years 2001, 2006, and 2011. This was a prospective cohort study of all newborns admitted to four university neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) during one month in 2001, 2006, and 2011. The frequency of analgesic prescription for painful procedures was evaluated. Of the 202 neonatologists, 188 answered a questionnaire giving their opinion on the intensity of pain during lumbar puncture (LP), tracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation (MV), and postoperative period (PO) using a 10-cm visual analogic scale (VAS; pain >3cm). For LP, 12% (2001), 43% (2006), and 36% (2011) were performed using analgesia. Among the neonatologists, 40-50% reported VAS >3 for LP in all study periods. For intubation, 30% received analgesia in the study periods, and 35% (2001), 55% (2006), and 73% (2011) of the neonatologists reported VAS >3 and would prescribe analgesia for this procedure. As for MV, 45% (2001), 64% (2006), and 48% (2011) of patient-days were under analgesia; 56% (2001), 57% (2006), and 26% (2011) of neonatologists reported VAS >3 and said they would use analgesia during MV. For the first three PO days, 37% (2001), 78% (2006), and 89% (2011) of the patients received analgesia and more than 90% of neonatologists reported VAS >3 for major surgeries. Despite an increase in the medical perception of neonatal pain and in analgesic use during painful procedures, the gap between clinical practice and neonatologist perception of analgesia need did not change during the ten-year period.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-07T15:38:58Z
2015-12-07T15:38:58Z
2015-10-06
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2015.04.009
Jornal De Pediatria, 2015.
1678-4782
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/131626
10.1016/j.jped.2015.04.009
S0021-75572016000100088
S0021-75572016000100088.pdf
2559637400719543
26453514
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2015.04.009
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/131626
identifier_str_mv Jornal De Pediatria, 2015.
1678-4782
10.1016/j.jped.2015.04.009
S0021-75572016000100088
S0021-75572016000100088.pdf
2559637400719543
26453514
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Jornal De Pediatria
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B. V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B. V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv PubMed
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1810021384293711872