In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for atraumatic restorative treatment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Duque, Cristiane [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Aida, Kelly Limi [UNESP], Pereira, Jesse Augusto [UNESP], Teixeira, Gláucia Schuindt, Caldo-Teixeira, Angela Scarparo, Perrone, Luciana Rodrigues, Caiaffa, Karina Sampaio [UNESP], Negrini, Thais de Cássia, de Castilho, Aline Rogéria Freire, Costa, Carlos Alberto de Souza [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0195
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/175384
Resumo: Objectives: Addition of chlorhexidine has enhanced the antimicrobial effect of glass ionomer cement (GIC) indicated to Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART); however, the impact of this mixture on the properties of these materials and on the longevity of restorations must be investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of incorporating chlorhexidine (CHX) in the in vitro biological and chemical-mechanical properties of GIC and in vivo clinical/ microbiological follow-up of the ART with GIC containing or not CHX. Material and Methods: For in vitro studies, groups were divided into GIC, GIC with 1.25% CHX, and GIC with 2.5% CHX. Antimicrobial activity of GIC was analyzed using agar diffusion and anti-biofilm assays. Cytotoxic effects, compressive tensile strength, microhardness and fluoride (F) release were also evaluated. A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 36 children that received ART either with GIC or GIC with CHX. Saliva and biofilm were collected for mutans streptococci (MS) counts and the survival rate of restorations was checked after 7 days, 3 months and one year after ART. ANOVA/Tukey or Kruskal-Wallis/ Mann-Whitney tests were performed for in vitro tests and in vivo microbiological analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and Log rank tests were applied to estimate survival percentages of restorations (p<0.05). Results: Incorporation of 1.25% and 2.5% CHX improved the antimicrobial/anti-biofilm activity of GIC, without affecting F release and mechanical characteristics, but 2.5% CHX was cytotoxic. Survival rate of restorations using GIC with 1.25% CHX was similar to GIC. A significant reduction of MS levels was observed for KM+CHX group in children saliva and biofilm 7 days after treatment. Conclusions: The incorporation of 1.25% CHX increased the in vitro antimicrobial activity, without changing chemical-mechanical properties of GIC and odontoblast-like cell viability. This combination improved the in vivo short-term microbiological effect without affecting clinical performance of ART restorations.
id UNSP_6a709b5ba85f383d8b93e823c91a8061
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/175384
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for atraumatic restorative treatmentChlorhexidineDental atraumatic restorative treatmentGlass ionomer cementsObjectives: Addition of chlorhexidine has enhanced the antimicrobial effect of glass ionomer cement (GIC) indicated to Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART); however, the impact of this mixture on the properties of these materials and on the longevity of restorations must be investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of incorporating chlorhexidine (CHX) in the in vitro biological and chemical-mechanical properties of GIC and in vivo clinical/ microbiological follow-up of the ART with GIC containing or not CHX. Material and Methods: For in vitro studies, groups were divided into GIC, GIC with 1.25% CHX, and GIC with 2.5% CHX. Antimicrobial activity of GIC was analyzed using agar diffusion and anti-biofilm assays. Cytotoxic effects, compressive tensile strength, microhardness and fluoride (F) release were also evaluated. A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 36 children that received ART either with GIC or GIC with CHX. Saliva and biofilm were collected for mutans streptococci (MS) counts and the survival rate of restorations was checked after 7 days, 3 months and one year after ART. ANOVA/Tukey or Kruskal-Wallis/ Mann-Whitney tests were performed for in vitro tests and in vivo microbiological analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and Log rank tests were applied to estimate survival percentages of restorations (p<0.05). Results: Incorporation of 1.25% and 2.5% CHX improved the antimicrobial/anti-biofilm activity of GIC, without affecting F release and mechanical characteristics, but 2.5% CHX was cytotoxic. Survival rate of restorations using GIC with 1.25% CHX was similar to GIC. A significant reduction of MS levels was observed for KM+CHX group in children saliva and biofilm 7 days after treatment. Conclusions: The incorporation of 1.25% CHX increased the in vitro antimicrobial activity, without changing chemical-mechanical properties of GIC and odontoblast-like cell viability. This combination improved the in vivo short-term microbiological effect without affecting clinical performance of ART restorations.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)Univ. Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba Departamento de Odontologia Infantil e SocialUniversidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) Instituto de Saude de Nova Friburgo Departamento de OdontologiaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) Faculdade de Odontologia Departamento de Odontologia ConservadoraUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba Departamento de Odontologia InfantilUniv. Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara Departamento de Fisiologia e PatologiaUniv. Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba Departamento de Odontologia Infantil e SocialUniv. Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara Departamento de Fisiologia e PatologiaFAPERJ: E-26/100.487/2010FAPERJ: E-26/110.205/2011Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)Faculdade de OdontologiaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Duque, Cristiane [UNESP]Aida, Kelly Limi [UNESP]Pereira, Jesse Augusto [UNESP]Teixeira, Gláucia SchuindtCaldo-Teixeira, Angela ScarparoPerrone, Luciana RodriguesCaiaffa, Karina Sampaio [UNESP]Negrini, Thais de Cássiade Castilho, Aline Rogéria FreireCosta, Carlos Alberto de Souza [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:15:35Z2018-12-11T17:15:35Z2017-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article541-550application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0195Journal of Applied Oral Science, v. 25, n. 5, p. 541-550, 2017.1678-77651678-7757http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17538410.1590/1678-7757-2016-0195S1678-775720170005005412-s2.0-85032212723S1678-77572017000500541.pdf56518745094936170000-0002-2575-279XScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Applied Oral Science0,645info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-27T14:04:28Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/175384Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-27T14:04:28Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for atraumatic restorative treatment
title In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for atraumatic restorative treatment
spellingShingle In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for atraumatic restorative treatment
Duque, Cristiane [UNESP]
Chlorhexidine
Dental atraumatic restorative treatment
Glass ionomer cements
title_short In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for atraumatic restorative treatment
title_full In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for atraumatic restorative treatment
title_fullStr In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for atraumatic restorative treatment
title_full_unstemmed In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for atraumatic restorative treatment
title_sort In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for atraumatic restorative treatment
author Duque, Cristiane [UNESP]
author_facet Duque, Cristiane [UNESP]
Aida, Kelly Limi [UNESP]
Pereira, Jesse Augusto [UNESP]
Teixeira, Gláucia Schuindt
Caldo-Teixeira, Angela Scarparo
Perrone, Luciana Rodrigues
Caiaffa, Karina Sampaio [UNESP]
Negrini, Thais de Cássia
de Castilho, Aline Rogéria Freire
Costa, Carlos Alberto de Souza [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Aida, Kelly Limi [UNESP]
Pereira, Jesse Augusto [UNESP]
Teixeira, Gláucia Schuindt
Caldo-Teixeira, Angela Scarparo
Perrone, Luciana Rodrigues
Caiaffa, Karina Sampaio [UNESP]
Negrini, Thais de Cássia
de Castilho, Aline Rogéria Freire
Costa, Carlos Alberto de Souza [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
Faculdade de Odontologia
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Duque, Cristiane [UNESP]
Aida, Kelly Limi [UNESP]
Pereira, Jesse Augusto [UNESP]
Teixeira, Gláucia Schuindt
Caldo-Teixeira, Angela Scarparo
Perrone, Luciana Rodrigues
Caiaffa, Karina Sampaio [UNESP]
Negrini, Thais de Cássia
de Castilho, Aline Rogéria Freire
Costa, Carlos Alberto de Souza [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chlorhexidine
Dental atraumatic restorative treatment
Glass ionomer cements
topic Chlorhexidine
Dental atraumatic restorative treatment
Glass ionomer cements
description Objectives: Addition of chlorhexidine has enhanced the antimicrobial effect of glass ionomer cement (GIC) indicated to Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART); however, the impact of this mixture on the properties of these materials and on the longevity of restorations must be investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of incorporating chlorhexidine (CHX) in the in vitro biological and chemical-mechanical properties of GIC and in vivo clinical/ microbiological follow-up of the ART with GIC containing or not CHX. Material and Methods: For in vitro studies, groups were divided into GIC, GIC with 1.25% CHX, and GIC with 2.5% CHX. Antimicrobial activity of GIC was analyzed using agar diffusion and anti-biofilm assays. Cytotoxic effects, compressive tensile strength, microhardness and fluoride (F) release were also evaluated. A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 36 children that received ART either with GIC or GIC with CHX. Saliva and biofilm were collected for mutans streptococci (MS) counts and the survival rate of restorations was checked after 7 days, 3 months and one year after ART. ANOVA/Tukey or Kruskal-Wallis/ Mann-Whitney tests were performed for in vitro tests and in vivo microbiological analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and Log rank tests were applied to estimate survival percentages of restorations (p<0.05). Results: Incorporation of 1.25% and 2.5% CHX improved the antimicrobial/anti-biofilm activity of GIC, without affecting F release and mechanical characteristics, but 2.5% CHX was cytotoxic. Survival rate of restorations using GIC with 1.25% CHX was similar to GIC. A significant reduction of MS levels was observed for KM+CHX group in children saliva and biofilm 7 days after treatment. Conclusions: The incorporation of 1.25% CHX increased the in vitro antimicrobial activity, without changing chemical-mechanical properties of GIC and odontoblast-like cell viability. This combination improved the in vivo short-term microbiological effect without affecting clinical performance of ART restorations.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09-01
2018-12-11T17:15:35Z
2018-12-11T17:15:35Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0195
Journal of Applied Oral Science, v. 25, n. 5, p. 541-550, 2017.
1678-7765
1678-7757
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/175384
10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0195
S1678-77572017000500541
2-s2.0-85032212723
S1678-77572017000500541.pdf
5651874509493617
0000-0002-2575-279X
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0195
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/175384
identifier_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science, v. 25, n. 5, p. 541-550, 2017.
1678-7765
1678-7757
10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0195
S1678-77572017000500541
2-s2.0-85032212723
S1678-77572017000500541.pdf
5651874509493617
0000-0002-2575-279X
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science
0,645
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 541-550
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546386347524096