SUPREME FEDERAL COURT LIKE VETO PLAYER: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE WORK OF GEORGE TSEBELIS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Claudio Ladeira de
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Santos, Samuel Martins [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2019.39613
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/195254
Resumo: This article has as its theme methodologies for examining constitutional courts in the field of constitutional law, in interdisciplinary reading with political science. In detail, studies on the operation and performance of the Federal Supreme Court in Brazil, considering the design of the Federal Constitution of 1988. The problem deals with the possibility of identification of the Supreme Court as a veto player, having as methodological theoretical reference the work of George Tsebelis. The hypothesis considers possible such a methodological option, and aims to identify its analytical potential for understanding the relations between the powers of the Republic in the contemporary Brazilian state. The method used is bibliographic, with institutional analyses, resulting in the conclusion of the broad possibility of application of such a theoretical milestone, as well as the need for some precautions to improve their analytical potential in relation to the power Judiciary.
id UNSP_6a82e7a4c6f9a0c7ec1293e49c2861d8
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/195254
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling SUPREME FEDERAL COURT LIKE VETO PLAYER: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE WORK OF GEORGE TSEBELISSupreme Court in BrazilVetoPlayerJurisdictionConstitutionThis article has as its theme methodologies for examining constitutional courts in the field of constitutional law, in interdisciplinary reading with political science. In detail, studies on the operation and performance of the Federal Supreme Court in Brazil, considering the design of the Federal Constitution of 1988. The problem deals with the possibility of identification of the Supreme Court as a veto player, having as methodological theoretical reference the work of George Tsebelis. The hypothesis considers possible such a methodological option, and aims to identify its analytical potential for understanding the relations between the powers of the Republic in the contemporary Brazilian state. The method used is bibliographic, with institutional analyses, resulting in the conclusion of the broad possibility of application of such a theoretical milestone, as well as the need for some precautions to improve their analytical potential in relation to the power Judiciary.Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Programa Pos Grad Direito, Florianopolis, SC, BrazilUniv Estadual Campinas, Grp Direito & Polit, Campinas, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, SC, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Estado Rio JaneiroUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Oliveira, Claudio Ladeira deSantos, Samuel Martins [UNESP]2020-12-10T17:28:28Z2020-12-10T17:28:28Z2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article212-233http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2019.39613Quaestio Iuris. Rio De Janeiro Rj: Univ Estado Rio Janeiro, v. 12, n. 3, p. 212-233, 2019.1807-8389http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19525410.12957/rqi.2019.39613WOS:000519617300011Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporQuaestio Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T07:07:22Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/195254Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T07:07:22Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv SUPREME FEDERAL COURT LIKE VETO PLAYER: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE WORK OF GEORGE TSEBELIS
title SUPREME FEDERAL COURT LIKE VETO PLAYER: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE WORK OF GEORGE TSEBELIS
spellingShingle SUPREME FEDERAL COURT LIKE VETO PLAYER: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE WORK OF GEORGE TSEBELIS
Oliveira, Claudio Ladeira de
Supreme Court in Brazil
Veto
Player
Jurisdiction
Constitution
title_short SUPREME FEDERAL COURT LIKE VETO PLAYER: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE WORK OF GEORGE TSEBELIS
title_full SUPREME FEDERAL COURT LIKE VETO PLAYER: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE WORK OF GEORGE TSEBELIS
title_fullStr SUPREME FEDERAL COURT LIKE VETO PLAYER: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE WORK OF GEORGE TSEBELIS
title_full_unstemmed SUPREME FEDERAL COURT LIKE VETO PLAYER: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE WORK OF GEORGE TSEBELIS
title_sort SUPREME FEDERAL COURT LIKE VETO PLAYER: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE WORK OF GEORGE TSEBELIS
author Oliveira, Claudio Ladeira de
author_facet Oliveira, Claudio Ladeira de
Santos, Samuel Martins [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Santos, Samuel Martins [UNESP]
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Claudio Ladeira de
Santos, Samuel Martins [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Supreme Court in Brazil
Veto
Player
Jurisdiction
Constitution
topic Supreme Court in Brazil
Veto
Player
Jurisdiction
Constitution
description This article has as its theme methodologies for examining constitutional courts in the field of constitutional law, in interdisciplinary reading with political science. In detail, studies on the operation and performance of the Federal Supreme Court in Brazil, considering the design of the Federal Constitution of 1988. The problem deals with the possibility of identification of the Supreme Court as a veto player, having as methodological theoretical reference the work of George Tsebelis. The hypothesis considers possible such a methodological option, and aims to identify its analytical potential for understanding the relations between the powers of the Republic in the contemporary Brazilian state. The method used is bibliographic, with institutional analyses, resulting in the conclusion of the broad possibility of application of such a theoretical milestone, as well as the need for some precautions to improve their analytical potential in relation to the power Judiciary.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
2020-12-10T17:28:28Z
2020-12-10T17:28:28Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2019.39613
Quaestio Iuris. Rio De Janeiro Rj: Univ Estado Rio Janeiro, v. 12, n. 3, p. 212-233, 2019.
1807-8389
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/195254
10.12957/rqi.2019.39613
WOS:000519617300011
url http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2019.39613
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/195254
identifier_str_mv Quaestio Iuris. Rio De Janeiro Rj: Univ Estado Rio Janeiro, v. 12, n. 3, p. 212-233, 2019.
1807-8389
10.12957/rqi.2019.39613
WOS:000519617300011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Quaestio Iuris
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 212-233
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Estado Rio Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Estado Rio Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803047255186341888