Hesitations and relative proeminence in prosodic constituents in children’s speech
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212020220 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223342 |
Resumo: | Purpose: to verify if hesitations would occur, preferably, in strong or weak positions of four of the prosodic constituents: phonological utterance, intonational phrase, phonological phrase and clitic group. Methods: the data were extracted from a bank composed of 147 interview situations recorded with children aged 5-6 years. Was used the principle of relative prominence for the analysis of prosodic constituents. From this principle, the hesitant occurrences identified in prominent elements in the organization of each of the prosodic constituents was considered as for strong position and, as in a weak position, the hesitant occurrences identified in parts of constituents that surround the prominent positions. The judges detected 2.399 hesitant occurrences. Results: the following total hesitations were identified in strong and weak positions, respectively: (1) in the phonological utterance = 305 (28.37%) and 770 (71.63%); (2) in the intonational phrase = 285 (20.67%) and 1094 (79.33%); (3) in the phonological phrase = 129 (16.49%) and 653 (83.51%); and (4) in the clitic group = 154 (15.21%) and 859 (84.79%). Conclusion: although hesitant occurrences have been identified in strong positions in all prosodic constituents analyzed, there was prevalence due to the weak position. This result corroborates studies that claim that hesitations would occur in non-nuclear prosodic portions. Furthermore to this confirmation, the results reinforce the effectiveness of the prosodic phonology model in relation to the principle of relative prominence. |
id |
UNSP_6e7730f62ad76c094aaef85734a9a961 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223342 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Hesitations and relative proeminence in prosodic constituents in children’s speechHesitações e proeminência relativa em constituintes prosódicos na fala infantilChild languageCommunicationLanguage developmentLinguisticsSpeaksSpeech therapyPurpose: to verify if hesitations would occur, preferably, in strong or weak positions of four of the prosodic constituents: phonological utterance, intonational phrase, phonological phrase and clitic group. Methods: the data were extracted from a bank composed of 147 interview situations recorded with children aged 5-6 years. Was used the principle of relative prominence for the analysis of prosodic constituents. From this principle, the hesitant occurrences identified in prominent elements in the organization of each of the prosodic constituents was considered as for strong position and, as in a weak position, the hesitant occurrences identified in parts of constituents that surround the prominent positions. The judges detected 2.399 hesitant occurrences. Results: the following total hesitations were identified in strong and weak positions, respectively: (1) in the phonological utterance = 305 (28.37%) and 770 (71.63%); (2) in the intonational phrase = 285 (20.67%) and 1094 (79.33%); (3) in the phonological phrase = 129 (16.49%) and 653 (83.51%); and (4) in the clitic group = 154 (15.21%) and 859 (84.79%). Conclusion: although hesitant occurrences have been identified in strong positions in all prosodic constituents analyzed, there was prevalence due to the weak position. This result corroborates studies that claim that hesitations would occur in non-nuclear prosodic portions. Furthermore to this confirmation, the results reinforce the effectiveness of the prosodic phonology model in relation to the principle of relative prominence.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos Linguísticos Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESP, SPPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Estudos Linguísticos Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESP, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)de Camargo Sampaio Villega, Cristyane [UNESP]Chacon, Lourenço [UNESP]2022-04-28T19:50:06Z2022-04-28T19:50:06Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212020220CODAS, v. 34, n. 2, 2022.2317-1782http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22334210.1590/2317-1782/202120202202-s2.0-85123565372Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporCODASinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:50:06Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223342Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:11:45.965609Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Hesitations and relative proeminence in prosodic constituents in children’s speech Hesitações e proeminência relativa em constituintes prosódicos na fala infantil |
title |
Hesitations and relative proeminence in prosodic constituents in children’s speech |
spellingShingle |
Hesitations and relative proeminence in prosodic constituents in children’s speech de Camargo Sampaio Villega, Cristyane [UNESP] Child language Communication Language development Linguistics Speaks Speech therapy |
title_short |
Hesitations and relative proeminence in prosodic constituents in children’s speech |
title_full |
Hesitations and relative proeminence in prosodic constituents in children’s speech |
title_fullStr |
Hesitations and relative proeminence in prosodic constituents in children’s speech |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hesitations and relative proeminence in prosodic constituents in children’s speech |
title_sort |
Hesitations and relative proeminence in prosodic constituents in children’s speech |
author |
de Camargo Sampaio Villega, Cristyane [UNESP] |
author_facet |
de Camargo Sampaio Villega, Cristyane [UNESP] Chacon, Lourenço [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Chacon, Lourenço [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Camargo Sampaio Villega, Cristyane [UNESP] Chacon, Lourenço [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Child language Communication Language development Linguistics Speaks Speech therapy |
topic |
Child language Communication Language development Linguistics Speaks Speech therapy |
description |
Purpose: to verify if hesitations would occur, preferably, in strong or weak positions of four of the prosodic constituents: phonological utterance, intonational phrase, phonological phrase and clitic group. Methods: the data were extracted from a bank composed of 147 interview situations recorded with children aged 5-6 years. Was used the principle of relative prominence for the analysis of prosodic constituents. From this principle, the hesitant occurrences identified in prominent elements in the organization of each of the prosodic constituents was considered as for strong position and, as in a weak position, the hesitant occurrences identified in parts of constituents that surround the prominent positions. The judges detected 2.399 hesitant occurrences. Results: the following total hesitations were identified in strong and weak positions, respectively: (1) in the phonological utterance = 305 (28.37%) and 770 (71.63%); (2) in the intonational phrase = 285 (20.67%) and 1094 (79.33%); (3) in the phonological phrase = 129 (16.49%) and 653 (83.51%); and (4) in the clitic group = 154 (15.21%) and 859 (84.79%). Conclusion: although hesitant occurrences have been identified in strong positions in all prosodic constituents analyzed, there was prevalence due to the weak position. This result corroborates studies that claim that hesitations would occur in non-nuclear prosodic portions. Furthermore to this confirmation, the results reinforce the effectiveness of the prosodic phonology model in relation to the principle of relative prominence. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-28T19:50:06Z 2022-04-28T19:50:06Z 2022-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212020220 CODAS, v. 34, n. 2, 2022. 2317-1782 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223342 10.1590/2317-1782/20212020220 2-s2.0-85123565372 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212020220 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223342 |
identifier_str_mv |
CODAS, v. 34, n. 2, 2022. 2317-1782 10.1590/2317-1782/20212020220 2-s2.0-85123565372 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
CODAS |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129403026145280 |