Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lopes de Brito Filho, Armando [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Morlin Carneiro, Franciele, Costa Souza, Jarlyson Brunno [UNESP], Luns Hatun de Almeida, Samira [UNESP], Patias Lena, Bruno, Pereira da Silva, Rouverson [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041024
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/249904
Resumo: Machine harvesting is an essential step of crop production, considering a dynamic operation, and is subject to losses due to several factors that affect its quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of mechanized peanut pickers in the three soil tillage operations using Statistical Quality Control (SQC) tools. We conducted the experiments in a peanut field located at 21°20′23″ S and 47°54′06″ W of Brazilian peanut farmers. We used Statistic Control Quality (SQC) experimental design to monitor peanut losses during machine harvesting. The treatments evaluated were three soil tillage operations: conventional (CT), rotary tillers (RT), and hoe (RH). The quality indicators were collected inside the picker’s bulk tank. Statistical analyses used were descriptive statistics and SQC tools (run charts, control charts, and the Ishikawa diagram). The process was considered stable for indicators: whole pods (CT, RT, and RH), broken pods (CT, RT, and RH), and hatched pods (CT, RT, and RH), while the other indicators showed points that were out of control. With the application of SQC tools, it was possible to identify the factors that caused the increase of variability in peanut harvesting, listing the points to be improved to support decision-making, always aiming to increase this operation’s quality.
id UNSP_71ca499ded18de5fce94af8fb47b9da7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/249904
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker?Arachis hypogaeaLharvesting mechanizationimpurityqualitative lossesstatistical process controlMachine harvesting is an essential step of crop production, considering a dynamic operation, and is subject to losses due to several factors that affect its quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of mechanized peanut pickers in the three soil tillage operations using Statistical Quality Control (SQC) tools. We conducted the experiments in a peanut field located at 21°20′23″ S and 47°54′06″ W of Brazilian peanut farmers. We used Statistic Control Quality (SQC) experimental design to monitor peanut losses during machine harvesting. The treatments evaluated were three soil tillage operations: conventional (CT), rotary tillers (RT), and hoe (RH). The quality indicators were collected inside the picker’s bulk tank. Statistical analyses used were descriptive statistics and SQC tools (run charts, control charts, and the Ishikawa diagram). The process was considered stable for indicators: whole pods (CT, RT, and RH), broken pods (CT, RT, and RH), and hatched pods (CT, RT, and RH), while the other indicators showed points that were out of control. With the application of SQC tools, it was possible to identify the factors that caused the increase of variability in peanut harvesting, listing the points to be improved to support decision-making, always aiming to increase this operation’s quality.Department of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp), São PauloFederal Technological University of Paraná (UTFPR), ParanáUniversity of Nebraska–LincolnDepartment of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp), São PauloUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Federal Technological University of Paraná (UTFPR)University of Nebraska–LincolnLopes de Brito Filho, Armando [UNESP]Morlin Carneiro, FrancieleCosta Souza, Jarlyson Brunno [UNESP]Luns Hatun de Almeida, Samira [UNESP]Patias Lena, BrunoPereira da Silva, Rouverson [UNESP]2023-07-29T16:12:27Z2023-07-29T16:12:27Z2023-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041024Agronomy, v. 13, n. 4, 2023.2073-4395http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24990410.3390/agronomy130410242-s2.0-85153883784Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAgronomyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-06T15:18:04Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/249904Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:55:06.573101Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker?
title Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker?
spellingShingle Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker?
Lopes de Brito Filho, Armando [UNESP]
Arachis hypogaeaL
harvesting mechanization
impurity
qualitative losses
statistical process control
title_short Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker?
title_full Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker?
title_fullStr Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker?
title_full_unstemmed Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker?
title_sort Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker?
author Lopes de Brito Filho, Armando [UNESP]
author_facet Lopes de Brito Filho, Armando [UNESP]
Morlin Carneiro, Franciele
Costa Souza, Jarlyson Brunno [UNESP]
Luns Hatun de Almeida, Samira [UNESP]
Patias Lena, Bruno
Pereira da Silva, Rouverson [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Morlin Carneiro, Franciele
Costa Souza, Jarlyson Brunno [UNESP]
Luns Hatun de Almeida, Samira [UNESP]
Patias Lena, Bruno
Pereira da Silva, Rouverson [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Federal Technological University of Paraná (UTFPR)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lopes de Brito Filho, Armando [UNESP]
Morlin Carneiro, Franciele
Costa Souza, Jarlyson Brunno [UNESP]
Luns Hatun de Almeida, Samira [UNESP]
Patias Lena, Bruno
Pereira da Silva, Rouverson [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arachis hypogaeaL
harvesting mechanization
impurity
qualitative losses
statistical process control
topic Arachis hypogaeaL
harvesting mechanization
impurity
qualitative losses
statistical process control
description Machine harvesting is an essential step of crop production, considering a dynamic operation, and is subject to losses due to several factors that affect its quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of mechanized peanut pickers in the three soil tillage operations using Statistical Quality Control (SQC) tools. We conducted the experiments in a peanut field located at 21°20′23″ S and 47°54′06″ W of Brazilian peanut farmers. We used Statistic Control Quality (SQC) experimental design to monitor peanut losses during machine harvesting. The treatments evaluated were three soil tillage operations: conventional (CT), rotary tillers (RT), and hoe (RH). The quality indicators were collected inside the picker’s bulk tank. Statistical analyses used were descriptive statistics and SQC tools (run charts, control charts, and the Ishikawa diagram). The process was considered stable for indicators: whole pods (CT, RT, and RH), broken pods (CT, RT, and RH), and hatched pods (CT, RT, and RH), while the other indicators showed points that were out of control. With the application of SQC tools, it was possible to identify the factors that caused the increase of variability in peanut harvesting, listing the points to be improved to support decision-making, always aiming to increase this operation’s quality.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-29T16:12:27Z
2023-07-29T16:12:27Z
2023-04-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041024
Agronomy, v. 13, n. 4, 2023.
2073-4395
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/249904
10.3390/agronomy13041024
2-s2.0-85153883784
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041024
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/249904
identifier_str_mv Agronomy, v. 13, n. 4, 2023.
2073-4395
10.3390/agronomy13041024
2-s2.0-85153883784
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Agronomy
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128583035518976