Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041024 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/249904 |
Resumo: | Machine harvesting is an essential step of crop production, considering a dynamic operation, and is subject to losses due to several factors that affect its quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of mechanized peanut pickers in the three soil tillage operations using Statistical Quality Control (SQC) tools. We conducted the experiments in a peanut field located at 21°20′23″ S and 47°54′06″ W of Brazilian peanut farmers. We used Statistic Control Quality (SQC) experimental design to monitor peanut losses during machine harvesting. The treatments evaluated were three soil tillage operations: conventional (CT), rotary tillers (RT), and hoe (RH). The quality indicators were collected inside the picker’s bulk tank. Statistical analyses used were descriptive statistics and SQC tools (run charts, control charts, and the Ishikawa diagram). The process was considered stable for indicators: whole pods (CT, RT, and RH), broken pods (CT, RT, and RH), and hatched pods (CT, RT, and RH), while the other indicators showed points that were out of control. With the application of SQC tools, it was possible to identify the factors that caused the increase of variability in peanut harvesting, listing the points to be improved to support decision-making, always aiming to increase this operation’s quality. |
id |
UNSP_71ca499ded18de5fce94af8fb47b9da7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/249904 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker?Arachis hypogaeaLharvesting mechanizationimpurityqualitative lossesstatistical process controlMachine harvesting is an essential step of crop production, considering a dynamic operation, and is subject to losses due to several factors that affect its quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of mechanized peanut pickers in the three soil tillage operations using Statistical Quality Control (SQC) tools. We conducted the experiments in a peanut field located at 21°20′23″ S and 47°54′06″ W of Brazilian peanut farmers. We used Statistic Control Quality (SQC) experimental design to monitor peanut losses during machine harvesting. The treatments evaluated were three soil tillage operations: conventional (CT), rotary tillers (RT), and hoe (RH). The quality indicators were collected inside the picker’s bulk tank. Statistical analyses used were descriptive statistics and SQC tools (run charts, control charts, and the Ishikawa diagram). The process was considered stable for indicators: whole pods (CT, RT, and RH), broken pods (CT, RT, and RH), and hatched pods (CT, RT, and RH), while the other indicators showed points that were out of control. With the application of SQC tools, it was possible to identify the factors that caused the increase of variability in peanut harvesting, listing the points to be improved to support decision-making, always aiming to increase this operation’s quality.Department of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp), São PauloFederal Technological University of Paraná (UTFPR), ParanáUniversity of Nebraska–LincolnDepartment of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp), São PauloUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Federal Technological University of Paraná (UTFPR)University of Nebraska–LincolnLopes de Brito Filho, Armando [UNESP]Morlin Carneiro, FrancieleCosta Souza, Jarlyson Brunno [UNESP]Luns Hatun de Almeida, Samira [UNESP]Patias Lena, BrunoPereira da Silva, Rouverson [UNESP]2023-07-29T16:12:27Z2023-07-29T16:12:27Z2023-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041024Agronomy, v. 13, n. 4, 2023.2073-4395http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24990410.3390/agronomy130410242-s2.0-85153883784Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAgronomyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-06T15:18:04Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/249904Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:55:06.573101Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker? |
title |
Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker? |
spellingShingle |
Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker? Lopes de Brito Filho, Armando [UNESP] Arachis hypogaeaL harvesting mechanization impurity qualitative losses statistical process control |
title_short |
Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker? |
title_full |
Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker? |
title_fullStr |
Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker? |
title_sort |
Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker? |
author |
Lopes de Brito Filho, Armando [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Lopes de Brito Filho, Armando [UNESP] Morlin Carneiro, Franciele Costa Souza, Jarlyson Brunno [UNESP] Luns Hatun de Almeida, Samira [UNESP] Patias Lena, Bruno Pereira da Silva, Rouverson [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Morlin Carneiro, Franciele Costa Souza, Jarlyson Brunno [UNESP] Luns Hatun de Almeida, Samira [UNESP] Patias Lena, Bruno Pereira da Silva, Rouverson [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Federal Technological University of Paraná (UTFPR) University of Nebraska–Lincoln |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lopes de Brito Filho, Armando [UNESP] Morlin Carneiro, Franciele Costa Souza, Jarlyson Brunno [UNESP] Luns Hatun de Almeida, Samira [UNESP] Patias Lena, Bruno Pereira da Silva, Rouverson [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Arachis hypogaeaL harvesting mechanization impurity qualitative losses statistical process control |
topic |
Arachis hypogaeaL harvesting mechanization impurity qualitative losses statistical process control |
description |
Machine harvesting is an essential step of crop production, considering a dynamic operation, and is subject to losses due to several factors that affect its quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of mechanized peanut pickers in the three soil tillage operations using Statistical Quality Control (SQC) tools. We conducted the experiments in a peanut field located at 21°20′23″ S and 47°54′06″ W of Brazilian peanut farmers. We used Statistic Control Quality (SQC) experimental design to monitor peanut losses during machine harvesting. The treatments evaluated were three soil tillage operations: conventional (CT), rotary tillers (RT), and hoe (RH). The quality indicators were collected inside the picker’s bulk tank. Statistical analyses used were descriptive statistics and SQC tools (run charts, control charts, and the Ishikawa diagram). The process was considered stable for indicators: whole pods (CT, RT, and RH), broken pods (CT, RT, and RH), and hatched pods (CT, RT, and RH), while the other indicators showed points that were out of control. With the application of SQC tools, it was possible to identify the factors that caused the increase of variability in peanut harvesting, listing the points to be improved to support decision-making, always aiming to increase this operation’s quality. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-29T16:12:27Z 2023-07-29T16:12:27Z 2023-04-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041024 Agronomy, v. 13, n. 4, 2023. 2073-4395 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/249904 10.3390/agronomy13041024 2-s2.0-85153883784 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041024 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/249904 |
identifier_str_mv |
Agronomy, v. 13, n. 4, 2023. 2073-4395 10.3390/agronomy13041024 2-s2.0-85153883784 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Agronomy |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128583035518976 |