Sobre termos, proposições e argumentos
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0101-31732017000400004 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170448 |
Resumo: | Pragmatism, as proposed by Charles S. Peirce, should be considered a method for the theoretical production of thought that aims the construction of concepts, which takes the form of a logical maxim guiding scientific conduct. If a concept is a sign relationship and its understanding a sign process, we find in Peircean semiotics a strategy to discriminate the stages of conceptual understanding and to evaluate the meanings of abstract terms and concepts. Therefore, the aim of this work is to explain the logical principles that govern the types of Signs that more directly are related to the construction of concepts, namely: the Rhematic Symbol, the Dicent Symbol and the Argument. Such signs correspond to the old division between Term, Proposition and Argument, modified in order to be applicable to the signs in general. |
id |
UNSP_736cea2a6d5e0ba0d28baa0762698a3a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170448 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Sobre termos, proposições e argumentosAbout terms, propositions and argumentsArgumentsCharles s. peircePragmatismPropositionsTermsPragmatism, as proposed by Charles S. Peirce, should be considered a method for the theoretical production of thought that aims the construction of concepts, which takes the form of a logical maxim guiding scientific conduct. If a concept is a sign relationship and its understanding a sign process, we find in Peircean semiotics a strategy to discriminate the stages of conceptual understanding and to evaluate the meanings of abstract terms and concepts. Therefore, the aim of this work is to explain the logical principles that govern the types of Signs that more directly are related to the construction of concepts, namely: the Rhematic Symbol, the Dicent Symbol and the Argument. Such signs correspond to the old division between Term, Proposition and Argument, modified in order to be applicable to the signs in general.UNESPUNESPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Pires, Jorge de Barros [UNESP]da Silveira, Lauro Frederico Barbosa [UNESP]2018-12-11T16:50:51Z2018-12-11T16:50:51Z2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article47-66application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0101-31732017000400004Trans/Form/Acao, v. 40, n. 4, p. 47-66, 2017.0101-3173http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17044810.1590/s0101-31732017000400004S0101-317320170004000472-s2.0-85037362172S0101-31732017000400047.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporTrans/Form/Acao0,100info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-10T06:03:19Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170448Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:30:08.786962Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sobre termos, proposições e argumentos About terms, propositions and arguments |
title |
Sobre termos, proposições e argumentos |
spellingShingle |
Sobre termos, proposições e argumentos Pires, Jorge de Barros [UNESP] Arguments Charles s. peirce Pragmatism Propositions Terms |
title_short |
Sobre termos, proposições e argumentos |
title_full |
Sobre termos, proposições e argumentos |
title_fullStr |
Sobre termos, proposições e argumentos |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sobre termos, proposições e argumentos |
title_sort |
Sobre termos, proposições e argumentos |
author |
Pires, Jorge de Barros [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Pires, Jorge de Barros [UNESP] da Silveira, Lauro Frederico Barbosa [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
da Silveira, Lauro Frederico Barbosa [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pires, Jorge de Barros [UNESP] da Silveira, Lauro Frederico Barbosa [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Arguments Charles s. peirce Pragmatism Propositions Terms |
topic |
Arguments Charles s. peirce Pragmatism Propositions Terms |
description |
Pragmatism, as proposed by Charles S. Peirce, should be considered a method for the theoretical production of thought that aims the construction of concepts, which takes the form of a logical maxim guiding scientific conduct. If a concept is a sign relationship and its understanding a sign process, we find in Peircean semiotics a strategy to discriminate the stages of conceptual understanding and to evaluate the meanings of abstract terms and concepts. Therefore, the aim of this work is to explain the logical principles that govern the types of Signs that more directly are related to the construction of concepts, namely: the Rhematic Symbol, the Dicent Symbol and the Argument. Such signs correspond to the old division between Term, Proposition and Argument, modified in order to be applicable to the signs in general. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-01 2018-12-11T16:50:51Z 2018-12-11T16:50:51Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0101-31732017000400004 Trans/Form/Acao, v. 40, n. 4, p. 47-66, 2017. 0101-3173 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170448 10.1590/s0101-31732017000400004 S0101-31732017000400047 2-s2.0-85037362172 S0101-31732017000400047.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0101-31732017000400004 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170448 |
identifier_str_mv |
Trans/Form/Acao, v. 40, n. 4, p. 47-66, 2017. 0101-3173 10.1590/s0101-31732017000400004 S0101-31732017000400047 2-s2.0-85037362172 S0101-31732017000400047.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Trans/Form/Acao 0,100 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
47-66 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128369659740160 |