Evaluation of guided bone regeneration in critical defects using bovine and porcine collagen membranes: Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analyses

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ramires, Guilherme A. D. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Helena, Julia Taino [UNESP], De Oliveira, Júlio C.S. [UNESP], Faverani, Leonardo Perez [UNESP], Bassi, Ana Paula F. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8828194
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206242
Resumo: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a technique used to facilitate bone regeneration, which uses a biocompatible membrane acting as a physical barrier to prevent the adjacent connective tissue from invading the bone defect. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of bovine and porcine collagenous membranes as barriers to connective tissue invasion during the repair of critical bone defects in rat calvaria, using histological, histometric, and immunohistochemical analyses. For this study, 72 rats were divided into three groups: clot group (CG), bovine collagen group (BCG), and porcine collagen group (PCG). Analyses were performed on days 7, 15, 30, and 60. The histological results showed that the PCG exhibited bone neoformation starting from day 7, and after 30 days of repair, the surgical defect was completely filled in some animals. For the BCG, there was little bone neoformation activity in the initial periods, and from day 30 onwards, there was an increase in bone neoformation, with a greater increase on day 60. The data obtained in the histometric analysis reveal that, on day 30, the neoformed bone area did not vary greatly between the PCG and the BCG, though both varied from the CG. By day 60, the PCG presented a greater area of neoformation than the BCG. These results were corroborated by the immunohistochemistry results. In view of the results obtained, it can be concluded that all membranes studied in this research promoted GBR.
id UNSP_7912d7526ca029bd12606714e7215c33
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206242
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Evaluation of guided bone regeneration in critical defects using bovine and porcine collagen membranes: Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analysesGuided bone regeneration (GBR) is a technique used to facilitate bone regeneration, which uses a biocompatible membrane acting as a physical barrier to prevent the adjacent connective tissue from invading the bone defect. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of bovine and porcine collagenous membranes as barriers to connective tissue invasion during the repair of critical bone defects in rat calvaria, using histological, histometric, and immunohistochemical analyses. For this study, 72 rats were divided into three groups: clot group (CG), bovine collagen group (BCG), and porcine collagen group (PCG). Analyses were performed on days 7, 15, 30, and 60. The histological results showed that the PCG exhibited bone neoformation starting from day 7, and after 30 days of repair, the surgical defect was completely filled in some animals. For the BCG, there was little bone neoformation activity in the initial periods, and from day 30 onwards, there was an increase in bone neoformation, with a greater increase on day 60. The data obtained in the histometric analysis reveal that, on day 30, the neoformed bone area did not vary greatly between the PCG and the BCG, though both varied from the CG. By day 60, the PCG presented a greater area of neoformation than the BCG. These results were corroborated by the immunohistochemistry results. In view of the results obtained, it can be concluded that all membranes studied in this research promoted GBR.Department of Diagnosis and Surgery Araçatuba Dental School UnespDepartment of Dentistry Ceuma UniversityDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery Araçatuba Dental School UnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Ceuma UniversityRamires, Guilherme A. D. [UNESP]Helena, Julia Taino [UNESP]De Oliveira, Júlio C.S. [UNESP]Faverani, Leonardo Perez [UNESP]Bassi, Ana Paula F. [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:28:51Z2021-06-25T10:28:51Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8828194International Journal of Biomaterials, v. 2021.1687-87951687-8787http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20624210.1155/2021/88281942-s2.0-85104809359Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Biomaterialsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T01:35:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206242Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:37:29.400129Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of guided bone regeneration in critical defects using bovine and porcine collagen membranes: Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analyses
title Evaluation of guided bone regeneration in critical defects using bovine and porcine collagen membranes: Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analyses
spellingShingle Evaluation of guided bone regeneration in critical defects using bovine and porcine collagen membranes: Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analyses
Ramires, Guilherme A. D. [UNESP]
title_short Evaluation of guided bone regeneration in critical defects using bovine and porcine collagen membranes: Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analyses
title_full Evaluation of guided bone regeneration in critical defects using bovine and porcine collagen membranes: Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analyses
title_fullStr Evaluation of guided bone regeneration in critical defects using bovine and porcine collagen membranes: Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analyses
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of guided bone regeneration in critical defects using bovine and porcine collagen membranes: Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analyses
title_sort Evaluation of guided bone regeneration in critical defects using bovine and porcine collagen membranes: Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analyses
author Ramires, Guilherme A. D. [UNESP]
author_facet Ramires, Guilherme A. D. [UNESP]
Helena, Julia Taino [UNESP]
De Oliveira, Júlio C.S. [UNESP]
Faverani, Leonardo Perez [UNESP]
Bassi, Ana Paula F. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Helena, Julia Taino [UNESP]
De Oliveira, Júlio C.S. [UNESP]
Faverani, Leonardo Perez [UNESP]
Bassi, Ana Paula F. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Ceuma University
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramires, Guilherme A. D. [UNESP]
Helena, Julia Taino [UNESP]
De Oliveira, Júlio C.S. [UNESP]
Faverani, Leonardo Perez [UNESP]
Bassi, Ana Paula F. [UNESP]
description Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a technique used to facilitate bone regeneration, which uses a biocompatible membrane acting as a physical barrier to prevent the adjacent connective tissue from invading the bone defect. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of bovine and porcine collagenous membranes as barriers to connective tissue invasion during the repair of critical bone defects in rat calvaria, using histological, histometric, and immunohistochemical analyses. For this study, 72 rats were divided into three groups: clot group (CG), bovine collagen group (BCG), and porcine collagen group (PCG). Analyses were performed on days 7, 15, 30, and 60. The histological results showed that the PCG exhibited bone neoformation starting from day 7, and after 30 days of repair, the surgical defect was completely filled in some animals. For the BCG, there was little bone neoformation activity in the initial periods, and from day 30 onwards, there was an increase in bone neoformation, with a greater increase on day 60. The data obtained in the histometric analysis reveal that, on day 30, the neoformed bone area did not vary greatly between the PCG and the BCG, though both varied from the CG. By day 60, the PCG presented a greater area of neoformation than the BCG. These results were corroborated by the immunohistochemistry results. In view of the results obtained, it can be concluded that all membranes studied in this research promoted GBR.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T10:28:51Z
2021-06-25T10:28:51Z
2021-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8828194
International Journal of Biomaterials, v. 2021.
1687-8795
1687-8787
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206242
10.1155/2021/8828194
2-s2.0-85104809359
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8828194
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206242
identifier_str_mv International Journal of Biomaterials, v. 2021.
1687-8795
1687-8787
10.1155/2021/8828194
2-s2.0-85104809359
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Biomaterials
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129097471098880