Effect of Adhesive Resin Application on the Durability of Adhesion to CAD/CAM Glass-Ceramics after either Hydrofluoric Acid Etching or Self-etch Primer Application
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b3240691 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/245892 |
Resumo: | Purpose: To evaluate the effect of two surface conditioning methods, namely conventional hydrofluoric acid vs self-etching primer, and the application of adhesive on the bond strength of composite cement to CAD/CAM glass-ceramics. Materials and Methods: Blocks (N = 96) (12 x 10 x 2.5 mm) were manufactured, 24 for each tested ceramic type: lithium silicate ceramic (LS), polymer-infiltrated ceramic (PIC), leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic (FD), and lithiumdisilicate glass-ceramic (LD). For bond strength testing, 64 blocks were randomly divided into 16 groups (4 blocks per group) according to the following factors: ceramic: 4 levels; etching: 2 levels (HFS: hydrofluoric acid + silane or Monobond Etch & Prime [MEP]); and adhesive application: 2 levels, with (signified as A) and without. Then for each group, 15 composite cement cylinders (AllCem Dual, FGM) were built up. All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (10,000 cycles) and to shear bonding strength testing (SBS) (100 kgf, 0.5 mm/min). Mean shear stresses (MPa) were statistically analyzed by three-way ANOVA, Tukey’s test, and Weibull analysis. Results: The mean bond strength of group PIC-HFS-A (28.45 ± 7.6 MPa) was significantly higher than that of groups LS-HFS-A (12.11 ± 2.7 MPa) and FDHFSA (20.86 ± 2.0 MPa). Group PIC-HFS bond strength (25.02 ± 6.5 MPa) was significantly higher only when compared to group LS-HFS (15.82 ± 4.4 MPa). The LS group presented lower SBS compared to all other groups. No significant differences were found between HFS and MEP surface treatments. Conclusion: Surface treatment with MEP promotes adhesion similar to that of HFS. Additional application of adhesive after the surface treatments did not improve the bond strength. |
id |
UNSP_857408956f03f90bd5adb4d8380939bc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/245892 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effect of Adhesive Resin Application on the Durability of Adhesion to CAD/CAM Glass-Ceramics after either Hydrofluoric Acid Etching or Self-etch Primer ApplicationAdhesionBondingCad/camDental ceramicsDental materials.Glass-ceramicShear bondTreatment surfacePurpose: To evaluate the effect of two surface conditioning methods, namely conventional hydrofluoric acid vs self-etching primer, and the application of adhesive on the bond strength of composite cement to CAD/CAM glass-ceramics. Materials and Methods: Blocks (N = 96) (12 x 10 x 2.5 mm) were manufactured, 24 for each tested ceramic type: lithium silicate ceramic (LS), polymer-infiltrated ceramic (PIC), leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic (FD), and lithiumdisilicate glass-ceramic (LD). For bond strength testing, 64 blocks were randomly divided into 16 groups (4 blocks per group) according to the following factors: ceramic: 4 levels; etching: 2 levels (HFS: hydrofluoric acid + silane or Monobond Etch & Prime [MEP]); and adhesive application: 2 levels, with (signified as A) and without. Then for each group, 15 composite cement cylinders (AllCem Dual, FGM) were built up. All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (10,000 cycles) and to shear bonding strength testing (SBS) (100 kgf, 0.5 mm/min). Mean shear stresses (MPa) were statistically analyzed by three-way ANOVA, Tukey’s test, and Weibull analysis. Results: The mean bond strength of group PIC-HFS-A (28.45 ± 7.6 MPa) was significantly higher than that of groups LS-HFS-A (12.11 ± 2.7 MPa) and FDHFSA (20.86 ± 2.0 MPa). Group PIC-HFS bond strength (25.02 ± 6.5 MPa) was significantly higher only when compared to group LS-HFS (15.82 ± 4.4 MPa). The LS group presented lower SBS compared to all other groups. No significant differences were found between HFS and MEP surface treatments. Conclusion: Surface treatment with MEP promotes adhesion similar to that of HFS. Additional application of adhesive after the surface treatments did not improve the bond strength.University of Pernambuco, PEState University of Rio Grande do Norte (UERN) Department of Dentistry, RNFederal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF) Department of Restorative Dentistry, MGUniversity Estadual Paulista-UNESP, SPUniversity of ZurichUniversity Estadual Paulista-UNESP, SPUniversity of PernambucoState University of Rio Grande do Norte (UERN)Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)University of ZurichVila-Nova, Taciana Emília LeiteMoura, Dayanne Monielle Duartede Araújo, Gabriela Monteirode Almeida Spinelli Pinto, RafaelLeite, Fabíola Pessôa PereiraMelo, Renata Marques [UNESP]Özcan, Mutlue Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção2023-07-29T12:26:02Z2023-07-29T12:26:02Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article279-289http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b3240691Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 24, n. 1, p. 279-289, 2022.1757-99881461-5185http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24589210.3290/j.jad.b32406912-s2.0-85136910785Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Adhesive Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-29T12:26:02Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/245892Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:02:55.357195Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of Adhesive Resin Application on the Durability of Adhesion to CAD/CAM Glass-Ceramics after either Hydrofluoric Acid Etching or Self-etch Primer Application |
title |
Effect of Adhesive Resin Application on the Durability of Adhesion to CAD/CAM Glass-Ceramics after either Hydrofluoric Acid Etching or Self-etch Primer Application |
spellingShingle |
Effect of Adhesive Resin Application on the Durability of Adhesion to CAD/CAM Glass-Ceramics after either Hydrofluoric Acid Etching or Self-etch Primer Application Vila-Nova, Taciana Emília Leite Adhesion Bonding Cad/cam Dental ceramics Dental materials. Glass-ceramic Shear bond Treatment surface |
title_short |
Effect of Adhesive Resin Application on the Durability of Adhesion to CAD/CAM Glass-Ceramics after either Hydrofluoric Acid Etching or Self-etch Primer Application |
title_full |
Effect of Adhesive Resin Application on the Durability of Adhesion to CAD/CAM Glass-Ceramics after either Hydrofluoric Acid Etching or Self-etch Primer Application |
title_fullStr |
Effect of Adhesive Resin Application on the Durability of Adhesion to CAD/CAM Glass-Ceramics after either Hydrofluoric Acid Etching or Self-etch Primer Application |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of Adhesive Resin Application on the Durability of Adhesion to CAD/CAM Glass-Ceramics after either Hydrofluoric Acid Etching or Self-etch Primer Application |
title_sort |
Effect of Adhesive Resin Application on the Durability of Adhesion to CAD/CAM Glass-Ceramics after either Hydrofluoric Acid Etching or Self-etch Primer Application |
author |
Vila-Nova, Taciana Emília Leite |
author_facet |
Vila-Nova, Taciana Emília Leite Moura, Dayanne Monielle Duarte de Araújo, Gabriela Monteiro de Almeida Spinelli Pinto, Rafael Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira Melo, Renata Marques [UNESP] Özcan, Mutlu e Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Moura, Dayanne Monielle Duarte de Araújo, Gabriela Monteiro de Almeida Spinelli Pinto, Rafael Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira Melo, Renata Marques [UNESP] Özcan, Mutlu e Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
University of Pernambuco State University of Rio Grande do Norte (UERN) Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) University of Zurich |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vila-Nova, Taciana Emília Leite Moura, Dayanne Monielle Duarte de Araújo, Gabriela Monteiro de Almeida Spinelli Pinto, Rafael Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira Melo, Renata Marques [UNESP] Özcan, Mutlu e Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Adhesion Bonding Cad/cam Dental ceramics Dental materials. Glass-ceramic Shear bond Treatment surface |
topic |
Adhesion Bonding Cad/cam Dental ceramics Dental materials. Glass-ceramic Shear bond Treatment surface |
description |
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of two surface conditioning methods, namely conventional hydrofluoric acid vs self-etching primer, and the application of adhesive on the bond strength of composite cement to CAD/CAM glass-ceramics. Materials and Methods: Blocks (N = 96) (12 x 10 x 2.5 mm) were manufactured, 24 for each tested ceramic type: lithium silicate ceramic (LS), polymer-infiltrated ceramic (PIC), leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic (FD), and lithiumdisilicate glass-ceramic (LD). For bond strength testing, 64 blocks were randomly divided into 16 groups (4 blocks per group) according to the following factors: ceramic: 4 levels; etching: 2 levels (HFS: hydrofluoric acid + silane or Monobond Etch & Prime [MEP]); and adhesive application: 2 levels, with (signified as A) and without. Then for each group, 15 composite cement cylinders (AllCem Dual, FGM) were built up. All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (10,000 cycles) and to shear bonding strength testing (SBS) (100 kgf, 0.5 mm/min). Mean shear stresses (MPa) were statistically analyzed by three-way ANOVA, Tukey’s test, and Weibull analysis. Results: The mean bond strength of group PIC-HFS-A (28.45 ± 7.6 MPa) was significantly higher than that of groups LS-HFS-A (12.11 ± 2.7 MPa) and FDHFSA (20.86 ± 2.0 MPa). Group PIC-HFS bond strength (25.02 ± 6.5 MPa) was significantly higher only when compared to group LS-HFS (15.82 ± 4.4 MPa). The LS group presented lower SBS compared to all other groups. No significant differences were found between HFS and MEP surface treatments. Conclusion: Surface treatment with MEP promotes adhesion similar to that of HFS. Additional application of adhesive after the surface treatments did not improve the bond strength. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 2023-07-29T12:26:02Z 2023-07-29T12:26:02Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b3240691 Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 24, n. 1, p. 279-289, 2022. 1757-9988 1461-5185 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/245892 10.3290/j.jad.b3240691 2-s2.0-85136910785 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b3240691 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/245892 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 24, n. 1, p. 279-289, 2022. 1757-9988 1461-5185 10.3290/j.jad.b3240691 2-s2.0-85136910785 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
279-289 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128745703211008 |