Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2018.12.022 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190036 |
Resumo: | Plant parasitic nematodes reduce the production of agricultural crops. Species diagnosis is essential to predict losses, determine economic damage levels and develop integrated pest management programs. DNA extraction techniques need to be improved for precise and rapid molecular diagnosis of nematodes. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of DNA extraction and amplification by PCR, cost and execution time by Chelex, Worm Lysis Buffer Method (WLB), Holterman Lysis Buffer Method (HLB) and FastDNA methods for nematodes of the Meloidogyne genus. The qualitative and quantitative efficiency of DNA extraction varied between methods. The band size of the amplified PCR product with WLB, Chelex and HLB methods was 590 bp. Extraction with the FastDNA is not recommended for DNA extraction from nematodes because it results in a low DNA concentration without bands in PCR amplification, besides presenting high cost. The efficiency of the WLB method to extracting DNA from Meloidogyne javanica was greater, ensuring a higher concentration and purity of the extracted material and guaranteeing lower costs and greater ease of PCR amplification. |
id |
UNSP_8621da750fdd18e17e0a2c871e07ef60 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190036 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica28S rDNADNA extractionMeloidogyne spp.Nematode identificationPCRPlant parasitic nematodes reduce the production of agricultural crops. Species diagnosis is essential to predict losses, determine economic damage levels and develop integrated pest management programs. DNA extraction techniques need to be improved for precise and rapid molecular diagnosis of nematodes. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of DNA extraction and amplification by PCR, cost and execution time by Chelex, Worm Lysis Buffer Method (WLB), Holterman Lysis Buffer Method (HLB) and FastDNA methods for nematodes of the Meloidogyne genus. The qualitative and quantitative efficiency of DNA extraction varied between methods. The band size of the amplified PCR product with WLB, Chelex and HLB methods was 590 bp. Extraction with the FastDNA is not recommended for DNA extraction from nematodes because it results in a low DNA concentration without bands in PCR amplification, besides presenting high cost. The efficiency of the WLB method to extracting DNA from Meloidogyne javanica was greater, ensuring a higher concentration and purity of the extracted material and guaranteeing lower costs and greater ease of PCR amplification.University of MelbourneInstituto de Biotecnologia (IBTEC) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Campus de BotucatuFaculdade de Ciências Agronômicas (FCA) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Campus de BotucatuDepartamento de Entomologia/BIOAGRO Universidade Federal de ViçosaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Produção Vegetal Universidade Federal dos Vales Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM)Instituto de Biotecnologia (IBTEC) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Campus de BotucatuFaculdade de Ciências Agronômicas (FCA) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Campus de BotucatuUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)Carvalho, Vanessa Rafaela de [UNESP]Wilcken, Sílvia Renata Siciliano [UNESP]Wilcken, Carlos Frederico [UNESP]Castro, Bárbara Monteiro de Castro eSoares, Marcus AlvarengaZanuncio, José Cola2019-10-06T17:00:13Z2019-10-06T17:00:13Z2019-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article108-112http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2018.12.022Journal of Microbiological Methods, v. 157, p. 108-112.1872-83590167-7012http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19003610.1016/j.mimet.2018.12.0222-s2.0-85059852501Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Microbiological Methodsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T18:07:44Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190036Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:34:22.493343Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica |
title |
Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica |
spellingShingle |
Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica Carvalho, Vanessa Rafaela de [UNESP] 28S rDNA DNA extraction Meloidogyne spp. Nematode identification PCR |
title_short |
Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica |
title_full |
Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica |
title_fullStr |
Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica |
title_full_unstemmed |
Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica |
title_sort |
Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica |
author |
Carvalho, Vanessa Rafaela de [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Carvalho, Vanessa Rafaela de [UNESP] Wilcken, Sílvia Renata Siciliano [UNESP] Wilcken, Carlos Frederico [UNESP] Castro, Bárbara Monteiro de Castro e Soares, Marcus Alvarenga Zanuncio, José Cola |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Wilcken, Sílvia Renata Siciliano [UNESP] Wilcken, Carlos Frederico [UNESP] Castro, Bárbara Monteiro de Castro e Soares, Marcus Alvarenga Zanuncio, José Cola |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Vanessa Rafaela de [UNESP] Wilcken, Sílvia Renata Siciliano [UNESP] Wilcken, Carlos Frederico [UNESP] Castro, Bárbara Monteiro de Castro e Soares, Marcus Alvarenga Zanuncio, José Cola |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
28S rDNA DNA extraction Meloidogyne spp. Nematode identification PCR |
topic |
28S rDNA DNA extraction Meloidogyne spp. Nematode identification PCR |
description |
Plant parasitic nematodes reduce the production of agricultural crops. Species diagnosis is essential to predict losses, determine economic damage levels and develop integrated pest management programs. DNA extraction techniques need to be improved for precise and rapid molecular diagnosis of nematodes. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of DNA extraction and amplification by PCR, cost and execution time by Chelex, Worm Lysis Buffer Method (WLB), Holterman Lysis Buffer Method (HLB) and FastDNA methods for nematodes of the Meloidogyne genus. The qualitative and quantitative efficiency of DNA extraction varied between methods. The band size of the amplified PCR product with WLB, Chelex and HLB methods was 590 bp. Extraction with the FastDNA is not recommended for DNA extraction from nematodes because it results in a low DNA concentration without bands in PCR amplification, besides presenting high cost. The efficiency of the WLB method to extracting DNA from Meloidogyne javanica was greater, ensuring a higher concentration and purity of the extracted material and guaranteeing lower costs and greater ease of PCR amplification. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-06T17:00:13Z 2019-10-06T17:00:13Z 2019-02-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2018.12.022 Journal of Microbiological Methods, v. 157, p. 108-112. 1872-8359 0167-7012 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190036 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.12.022 2-s2.0-85059852501 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2018.12.022 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190036 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Microbiological Methods, v. 157, p. 108-112. 1872-8359 0167-7012 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.12.022 2-s2.0-85059852501 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Microbiological Methods |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
108-112 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129438928338944 |