Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Vanessa Rafaela de [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Wilcken, Sílvia Renata Siciliano [UNESP], Wilcken, Carlos Frederico [UNESP], Castro, Bárbara Monteiro de Castro e, Soares, Marcus Alvarenga, Zanuncio, José Cola
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2018.12.022
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190036
Resumo: Plant parasitic nematodes reduce the production of agricultural crops. Species diagnosis is essential to predict losses, determine economic damage levels and develop integrated pest management programs. DNA extraction techniques need to be improved for precise and rapid molecular diagnosis of nematodes. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of DNA extraction and amplification by PCR, cost and execution time by Chelex, Worm Lysis Buffer Method (WLB), Holterman Lysis Buffer Method (HLB) and FastDNA methods for nematodes of the Meloidogyne genus. The qualitative and quantitative efficiency of DNA extraction varied between methods. The band size of the amplified PCR product with WLB, Chelex and HLB methods was 590 bp. Extraction with the FastDNA is not recommended for DNA extraction from nematodes because it results in a low DNA concentration without bands in PCR amplification, besides presenting high cost. The efficiency of the WLB method to extracting DNA from Meloidogyne javanica was greater, ensuring a higher concentration and purity of the extracted material and guaranteeing lower costs and greater ease of PCR amplification.
id UNSP_8621da750fdd18e17e0a2c871e07ef60
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190036
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica28S rDNADNA extractionMeloidogyne spp.Nematode identificationPCRPlant parasitic nematodes reduce the production of agricultural crops. Species diagnosis is essential to predict losses, determine economic damage levels and develop integrated pest management programs. DNA extraction techniques need to be improved for precise and rapid molecular diagnosis of nematodes. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of DNA extraction and amplification by PCR, cost and execution time by Chelex, Worm Lysis Buffer Method (WLB), Holterman Lysis Buffer Method (HLB) and FastDNA methods for nematodes of the Meloidogyne genus. The qualitative and quantitative efficiency of DNA extraction varied between methods. The band size of the amplified PCR product with WLB, Chelex and HLB methods was 590 bp. Extraction with the FastDNA is not recommended for DNA extraction from nematodes because it results in a low DNA concentration without bands in PCR amplification, besides presenting high cost. The efficiency of the WLB method to extracting DNA from Meloidogyne javanica was greater, ensuring a higher concentration and purity of the extracted material and guaranteeing lower costs and greater ease of PCR amplification.University of MelbourneInstituto de Biotecnologia (IBTEC) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Campus de BotucatuFaculdade de Ciências Agronômicas (FCA) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Campus de BotucatuDepartamento de Entomologia/BIOAGRO Universidade Federal de ViçosaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Produção Vegetal Universidade Federal dos Vales Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM)Instituto de Biotecnologia (IBTEC) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Campus de BotucatuFaculdade de Ciências Agronômicas (FCA) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Campus de BotucatuUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)Carvalho, Vanessa Rafaela de [UNESP]Wilcken, Sílvia Renata Siciliano [UNESP]Wilcken, Carlos Frederico [UNESP]Castro, Bárbara Monteiro de Castro eSoares, Marcus AlvarengaZanuncio, José Cola2019-10-06T17:00:13Z2019-10-06T17:00:13Z2019-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article108-112http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2018.12.022Journal of Microbiological Methods, v. 157, p. 108-112.1872-83590167-7012http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19003610.1016/j.mimet.2018.12.0222-s2.0-85059852501Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Microbiological Methodsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T18:07:44Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190036Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:34:22.493343Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica
title Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica
spellingShingle Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica
Carvalho, Vanessa Rafaela de [UNESP]
28S rDNA
DNA extraction
Meloidogyne spp.
Nematode identification
PCR
title_short Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica
title_full Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica
title_fullStr Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica
title_full_unstemmed Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica
title_sort Technical and economic efficiency of methods for extracting genomic DNA from Meloidogyne javanica
author Carvalho, Vanessa Rafaela de [UNESP]
author_facet Carvalho, Vanessa Rafaela de [UNESP]
Wilcken, Sílvia Renata Siciliano [UNESP]
Wilcken, Carlos Frederico [UNESP]
Castro, Bárbara Monteiro de Castro e
Soares, Marcus Alvarenga
Zanuncio, José Cola
author_role author
author2 Wilcken, Sílvia Renata Siciliano [UNESP]
Wilcken, Carlos Frederico [UNESP]
Castro, Bárbara Monteiro de Castro e
Soares, Marcus Alvarenga
Zanuncio, José Cola
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho, Vanessa Rafaela de [UNESP]
Wilcken, Sílvia Renata Siciliano [UNESP]
Wilcken, Carlos Frederico [UNESP]
Castro, Bárbara Monteiro de Castro e
Soares, Marcus Alvarenga
Zanuncio, José Cola
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv 28S rDNA
DNA extraction
Meloidogyne spp.
Nematode identification
PCR
topic 28S rDNA
DNA extraction
Meloidogyne spp.
Nematode identification
PCR
description Plant parasitic nematodes reduce the production of agricultural crops. Species diagnosis is essential to predict losses, determine economic damage levels and develop integrated pest management programs. DNA extraction techniques need to be improved for precise and rapid molecular diagnosis of nematodes. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of DNA extraction and amplification by PCR, cost and execution time by Chelex, Worm Lysis Buffer Method (WLB), Holterman Lysis Buffer Method (HLB) and FastDNA methods for nematodes of the Meloidogyne genus. The qualitative and quantitative efficiency of DNA extraction varied between methods. The band size of the amplified PCR product with WLB, Chelex and HLB methods was 590 bp. Extraction with the FastDNA is not recommended for DNA extraction from nematodes because it results in a low DNA concentration without bands in PCR amplification, besides presenting high cost. The efficiency of the WLB method to extracting DNA from Meloidogyne javanica was greater, ensuring a higher concentration and purity of the extracted material and guaranteeing lower costs and greater ease of PCR amplification.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-06T17:00:13Z
2019-10-06T17:00:13Z
2019-02-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2018.12.022
Journal of Microbiological Methods, v. 157, p. 108-112.
1872-8359
0167-7012
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190036
10.1016/j.mimet.2018.12.022
2-s2.0-85059852501
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2018.12.022
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190036
identifier_str_mv Journal of Microbiological Methods, v. 157, p. 108-112.
1872-8359
0167-7012
10.1016/j.mimet.2018.12.022
2-s2.0-85059852501
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Microbiological Methods
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 108-112
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129438928338944