In vitro versus in vivo protein digestibility techniques for calculating PDCAAS (protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score) applied to chickpea fractions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tavano, Olga Luisa
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Neves, Valdir Augusto [UNESP], Silva Junior, Sinezio Inacio da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2016.10.005
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/162193
Resumo: Seven different in vitro methods to determine the protein digestibility for chickpea proteins were considered and also the application of these methodologies for calculating PDCAAS (protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score), seeking their correlations with the in vivo methodology. In vitro digestibility of raw and heated samples were determined using pepsin-pancreatin hydrolysis, considering soluble nitrogen via Kjeldahl (ppKJ) and hydrolysed peptide linkages using trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid and o-phthaldialdehyde. In vitro digestibility was also determined using trypsin, chymotrypsin and peptidase (3-Enz) or trypsin, chymotrypsin, peptidase and pronase solution (4-Enz). None of the correlations between in vitro and in vivo digestibilities were significant (at p < 0.0500), but, strong correlations were observed between PDCAAS calculated by in vitro and in vivo results. PDCAAS-ppKJ, PDCAAS-3-Enz and PDCAAS-4-Enz presented the highest correlations with in vivo method, r = 0.9316, 0.9442 and 0.9649 (p < 0.0500), respectively. The use of in vitro methods for calculating PDCAAS may be promising and deserves more discussions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
id UNSP_874b5ade27a3ab4bcb8d751e9785257e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/162193
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling In vitro versus in vivo protein digestibility techniques for calculating PDCAAS (protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score) applied to chickpea fractionsProtein digestibilityIn vitro digestibilityPDCAASChickpeaProtein fractionsSeven different in vitro methods to determine the protein digestibility for chickpea proteins were considered and also the application of these methodologies for calculating PDCAAS (protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score), seeking their correlations with the in vivo methodology. In vitro digestibility of raw and heated samples were determined using pepsin-pancreatin hydrolysis, considering soluble nitrogen via Kjeldahl (ppKJ) and hydrolysed peptide linkages using trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid and o-phthaldialdehyde. In vitro digestibility was also determined using trypsin, chymotrypsin and peptidase (3-Enz) or trypsin, chymotrypsin, peptidase and pronase solution (4-Enz). None of the correlations between in vitro and in vivo digestibilities were significant (at p < 0.0500), but, strong correlations were observed between PDCAAS calculated by in vitro and in vivo results. PDCAAS-ppKJ, PDCAAS-3-Enz and PDCAAS-4-Enz presented the highest correlations with in vivo method, r = 0.9316, 0.9442 and 0.9649 (p < 0.0500), respectively. The use of in vitro methods for calculating PDCAAS may be promising and deserves more discussions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Univ Fed Alfenas, Nutr Fac, 700 Gabriel Monteiro Silva, BR-37130000 Alfenas, MG, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Food & Nutr, Araraquara Jau Rd,Km 01, BR-14801902 Araraquara, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Alfenas, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Food & Med Dept, Gabriel Monteiro da Silva St 700, BR-37130000 Alfenas, MG, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Food & Nutr, Araraquara Jau Rd,Km 01, BR-14801902 Araraquara, SP, BrazilElsevier B.V.Univ Fed AlfenasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Tavano, Olga LuisaNeves, Valdir Augusto [UNESP]Silva Junior, Sinezio Inacio da2018-11-26T17:12:11Z2018-11-26T17:12:11Z2016-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article756-763application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2016.10.005Food Research International. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 89, p. 756-763, 2016.0963-9969http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16219310.1016/j.foodres.2016.10.005WOS:000388775500082WOS000388775500082.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengFood Research International1,472info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-21T12:46:49Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/162193Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T16:56:30.926466Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv In vitro versus in vivo protein digestibility techniques for calculating PDCAAS (protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score) applied to chickpea fractions
title In vitro versus in vivo protein digestibility techniques for calculating PDCAAS (protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score) applied to chickpea fractions
spellingShingle In vitro versus in vivo protein digestibility techniques for calculating PDCAAS (protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score) applied to chickpea fractions
Tavano, Olga Luisa
Protein digestibility
In vitro digestibility
PDCAAS
Chickpea
Protein fractions
title_short In vitro versus in vivo protein digestibility techniques for calculating PDCAAS (protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score) applied to chickpea fractions
title_full In vitro versus in vivo protein digestibility techniques for calculating PDCAAS (protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score) applied to chickpea fractions
title_fullStr In vitro versus in vivo protein digestibility techniques for calculating PDCAAS (protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score) applied to chickpea fractions
title_full_unstemmed In vitro versus in vivo protein digestibility techniques for calculating PDCAAS (protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score) applied to chickpea fractions
title_sort In vitro versus in vivo protein digestibility techniques for calculating PDCAAS (protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score) applied to chickpea fractions
author Tavano, Olga Luisa
author_facet Tavano, Olga Luisa
Neves, Valdir Augusto [UNESP]
Silva Junior, Sinezio Inacio da
author_role author
author2 Neves, Valdir Augusto [UNESP]
Silva Junior, Sinezio Inacio da
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Univ Fed Alfenas
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tavano, Olga Luisa
Neves, Valdir Augusto [UNESP]
Silva Junior, Sinezio Inacio da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Protein digestibility
In vitro digestibility
PDCAAS
Chickpea
Protein fractions
topic Protein digestibility
In vitro digestibility
PDCAAS
Chickpea
Protein fractions
description Seven different in vitro methods to determine the protein digestibility for chickpea proteins were considered and also the application of these methodologies for calculating PDCAAS (protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score), seeking their correlations with the in vivo methodology. In vitro digestibility of raw and heated samples were determined using pepsin-pancreatin hydrolysis, considering soluble nitrogen via Kjeldahl (ppKJ) and hydrolysed peptide linkages using trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid and o-phthaldialdehyde. In vitro digestibility was also determined using trypsin, chymotrypsin and peptidase (3-Enz) or trypsin, chymotrypsin, peptidase and pronase solution (4-Enz). None of the correlations between in vitro and in vivo digestibilities were significant (at p < 0.0500), but, strong correlations were observed between PDCAAS calculated by in vitro and in vivo results. PDCAAS-ppKJ, PDCAAS-3-Enz and PDCAAS-4-Enz presented the highest correlations with in vivo method, r = 0.9316, 0.9442 and 0.9649 (p < 0.0500), respectively. The use of in vitro methods for calculating PDCAAS may be promising and deserves more discussions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-11-01
2018-11-26T17:12:11Z
2018-11-26T17:12:11Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2016.10.005
Food Research International. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 89, p. 756-763, 2016.
0963-9969
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/162193
10.1016/j.foodres.2016.10.005
WOS:000388775500082
WOS000388775500082.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2016.10.005
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/162193
identifier_str_mv Food Research International. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv, v. 89, p. 756-763, 2016.
0963-9969
10.1016/j.foodres.2016.10.005
WOS:000388775500082
WOS000388775500082.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Food Research International
1,472
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 756-763
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128724810334208