Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvesting

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guimarães Júnnyor, Wellingthon da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: De Maria, Isabella Clerici, Araujo-Junior, Cezar Francisco, Diserens, Etienne, Severiano, Eduardo da Costa, Farhate, Camila Viana Vieira [UNESP], Souza, Zigomar Menezes de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114532
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223220
Resumo: Soil compaction in sugarcane plantation has increased in recent times due to intense mechanization of the production process and the increasing axle load of the machines. As such, there are need to evolve conservation systems which will minimize soil disturbance in sugarcane production thereby preventing soil structure degradation and maintain the soil quality, using appropriate compaction models. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of sugarcane harvesting operation under cover crop management systems and soil tillage practices implemented before sugarcane planting using load-bearing capacity models (LBCM). The experiment was set up in a randomised block design with three soil management systems (no tillage, minimum tillage, and minimum tillage combined with a deep subsoiler) and two crop rotations (peanut and sorghum). Soils samples were collected at three depths before and after sugarcane harvesting. The undisturbed soil samples were submitted to the uniaxial compression test, their precompression stress was determined and, afterwards the load-bearing capacity model for each treatment was developed. The load-bearing capacity models showed soil structure degradation under conventional tillage and pasture management, while there was a recuperative effect of soil structure in crop rotation management. However, peanut as a crop rotation made the soil more susceptible to compaction, regardless of soil tillage treatment. At harvest time, the soil was more susceptible to compaction under the following conditions: in the surface layer, with the use of deep subsoiling and with the use of cover crops (peanuts and sorghum). From a practical point of view, this indicates that the better soil physical condition obtained by soil tillage and the use of cover crops can be wiped out by the harvesting operation, thus traffic control actions (including soil moisture and traffic reduction) need to be adopted.
id UNSP_a6006ccd22decbefd423e457d31cac97
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223220
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvestingAgricultural machine trafficNo tillagePrecompression stressSoil management systemsSugarcaneSoil compaction in sugarcane plantation has increased in recent times due to intense mechanization of the production process and the increasing axle load of the machines. As such, there are need to evolve conservation systems which will minimize soil disturbance in sugarcane production thereby preventing soil structure degradation and maintain the soil quality, using appropriate compaction models. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of sugarcane harvesting operation under cover crop management systems and soil tillage practices implemented before sugarcane planting using load-bearing capacity models (LBCM). The experiment was set up in a randomised block design with three soil management systems (no tillage, minimum tillage, and minimum tillage combined with a deep subsoiler) and two crop rotations (peanut and sorghum). Soils samples were collected at three depths before and after sugarcane harvesting. The undisturbed soil samples were submitted to the uniaxial compression test, their precompression stress was determined and, afterwards the load-bearing capacity model for each treatment was developed. The load-bearing capacity models showed soil structure degradation under conventional tillage and pasture management, while there was a recuperative effect of soil structure in crop rotation management. However, peanut as a crop rotation made the soil more susceptible to compaction, regardless of soil tillage treatment. At harvest time, the soil was more susceptible to compaction under the following conditions: in the surface layer, with the use of deep subsoiling and with the use of cover crops (peanuts and sorghum). From a practical point of view, this indicates that the better soil physical condition obtained by soil tillage and the use of cover crops can be wiped out by the harvesting operation, thus traffic control actions (including soil moisture and traffic reduction) need to be adopted.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação AgrisusFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Department of Agronomy State University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS), MS 306 Rd, km 6.4Agronomic Institute of Campinas (IAC) Center for Research and Development in Soil and Environmental Resources, Av. Barão de Itapura, 1481Institute for Rural Development - IAPAR-EMATER (IDR-PARANA) Area of Soils (ASO), Rod. Celso Garcia Cid, km 375Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ARTGoiano Federal Institute of Science and Technology (IF Goiano), Campus Rio Verde, P.O. Box 66São Paulo State University School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences Department of Exact Sciences, via de acesso 20 Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/nState University of Campinas (UNICAMP) School of Agricultural Engineering (Feagri), Av. Cândido Rondon, 501São Paulo State University School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences Department of Exact Sciences, via de acesso 20 Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/nFundação Agrisus: 1439/2015FAPESP: 2014/07434-9Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS)Center for Research and Development in Soil and Environmental ResourcesArea of Soils (ASO)ARTGoiano Federal Institute of Science and Technology (IF Goiano)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Guimarães Júnnyor, Wellingthon da SilvaDe Maria, Isabella ClericiAraujo-Junior, Cezar FranciscoDiserens, EtienneSeveriano, Eduardo da CostaFarhate, Camila Viana Vieira [UNESP]Souza, Zigomar Menezes de2022-04-28T19:49:26Z2022-04-28T19:49:26Z2022-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114532Industrial Crops and Products, v. 177.0926-6690http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22322010.1016/j.indcrop.2022.1145322-s2.0-85122631626Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengIndustrial Crops and Productsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:49:26Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223220Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:49:09.319609Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvesting
title Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvesting
spellingShingle Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvesting
Guimarães Júnnyor, Wellingthon da Silva
Agricultural machine traffic
No tillage
Precompression stress
Soil management systems
Sugarcane
title_short Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvesting
title_full Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvesting
title_fullStr Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvesting
title_full_unstemmed Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvesting
title_sort Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvesting
author Guimarães Júnnyor, Wellingthon da Silva
author_facet Guimarães Júnnyor, Wellingthon da Silva
De Maria, Isabella Clerici
Araujo-Junior, Cezar Francisco
Diserens, Etienne
Severiano, Eduardo da Costa
Farhate, Camila Viana Vieira [UNESP]
Souza, Zigomar Menezes de
author_role author
author2 De Maria, Isabella Clerici
Araujo-Junior, Cezar Francisco
Diserens, Etienne
Severiano, Eduardo da Costa
Farhate, Camila Viana Vieira [UNESP]
Souza, Zigomar Menezes de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS)
Center for Research and Development in Soil and Environmental Resources
Area of Soils (ASO)
ART
Goiano Federal Institute of Science and Technology (IF Goiano)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guimarães Júnnyor, Wellingthon da Silva
De Maria, Isabella Clerici
Araujo-Junior, Cezar Francisco
Diserens, Etienne
Severiano, Eduardo da Costa
Farhate, Camila Viana Vieira [UNESP]
Souza, Zigomar Menezes de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agricultural machine traffic
No tillage
Precompression stress
Soil management systems
Sugarcane
topic Agricultural machine traffic
No tillage
Precompression stress
Soil management systems
Sugarcane
description Soil compaction in sugarcane plantation has increased in recent times due to intense mechanization of the production process and the increasing axle load of the machines. As such, there are need to evolve conservation systems which will minimize soil disturbance in sugarcane production thereby preventing soil structure degradation and maintain the soil quality, using appropriate compaction models. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of sugarcane harvesting operation under cover crop management systems and soil tillage practices implemented before sugarcane planting using load-bearing capacity models (LBCM). The experiment was set up in a randomised block design with three soil management systems (no tillage, minimum tillage, and minimum tillage combined with a deep subsoiler) and two crop rotations (peanut and sorghum). Soils samples were collected at three depths before and after sugarcane harvesting. The undisturbed soil samples were submitted to the uniaxial compression test, their precompression stress was determined and, afterwards the load-bearing capacity model for each treatment was developed. The load-bearing capacity models showed soil structure degradation under conventional tillage and pasture management, while there was a recuperative effect of soil structure in crop rotation management. However, peanut as a crop rotation made the soil more susceptible to compaction, regardless of soil tillage treatment. At harvest time, the soil was more susceptible to compaction under the following conditions: in the surface layer, with the use of deep subsoiling and with the use of cover crops (peanuts and sorghum). From a practical point of view, this indicates that the better soil physical condition obtained by soil tillage and the use of cover crops can be wiped out by the harvesting operation, thus traffic control actions (including soil moisture and traffic reduction) need to be adopted.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-28T19:49:26Z
2022-04-28T19:49:26Z
2022-03-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114532
Industrial Crops and Products, v. 177.
0926-6690
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223220
10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114532
2-s2.0-85122631626
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114532
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223220
identifier_str_mv Industrial Crops and Products, v. 177.
0926-6690
10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114532
2-s2.0-85122631626
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Industrial Crops and Products
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129252770447360