Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvesting
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114532 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223220 |
Resumo: | Soil compaction in sugarcane plantation has increased in recent times due to intense mechanization of the production process and the increasing axle load of the machines. As such, there are need to evolve conservation systems which will minimize soil disturbance in sugarcane production thereby preventing soil structure degradation and maintain the soil quality, using appropriate compaction models. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of sugarcane harvesting operation under cover crop management systems and soil tillage practices implemented before sugarcane planting using load-bearing capacity models (LBCM). The experiment was set up in a randomised block design with three soil management systems (no tillage, minimum tillage, and minimum tillage combined with a deep subsoiler) and two crop rotations (peanut and sorghum). Soils samples were collected at three depths before and after sugarcane harvesting. The undisturbed soil samples were submitted to the uniaxial compression test, their precompression stress was determined and, afterwards the load-bearing capacity model for each treatment was developed. The load-bearing capacity models showed soil structure degradation under conventional tillage and pasture management, while there was a recuperative effect of soil structure in crop rotation management. However, peanut as a crop rotation made the soil more susceptible to compaction, regardless of soil tillage treatment. At harvest time, the soil was more susceptible to compaction under the following conditions: in the surface layer, with the use of deep subsoiling and with the use of cover crops (peanuts and sorghum). From a practical point of view, this indicates that the better soil physical condition obtained by soil tillage and the use of cover crops can be wiped out by the harvesting operation, thus traffic control actions (including soil moisture and traffic reduction) need to be adopted. |
id |
UNSP_a6006ccd22decbefd423e457d31cac97 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223220 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvestingAgricultural machine trafficNo tillagePrecompression stressSoil management systemsSugarcaneSoil compaction in sugarcane plantation has increased in recent times due to intense mechanization of the production process and the increasing axle load of the machines. As such, there are need to evolve conservation systems which will minimize soil disturbance in sugarcane production thereby preventing soil structure degradation and maintain the soil quality, using appropriate compaction models. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of sugarcane harvesting operation under cover crop management systems and soil tillage practices implemented before sugarcane planting using load-bearing capacity models (LBCM). The experiment was set up in a randomised block design with three soil management systems (no tillage, minimum tillage, and minimum tillage combined with a deep subsoiler) and two crop rotations (peanut and sorghum). Soils samples were collected at three depths before and after sugarcane harvesting. The undisturbed soil samples were submitted to the uniaxial compression test, their precompression stress was determined and, afterwards the load-bearing capacity model for each treatment was developed. The load-bearing capacity models showed soil structure degradation under conventional tillage and pasture management, while there was a recuperative effect of soil structure in crop rotation management. However, peanut as a crop rotation made the soil more susceptible to compaction, regardless of soil tillage treatment. At harvest time, the soil was more susceptible to compaction under the following conditions: in the surface layer, with the use of deep subsoiling and with the use of cover crops (peanuts and sorghum). From a practical point of view, this indicates that the better soil physical condition obtained by soil tillage and the use of cover crops can be wiped out by the harvesting operation, thus traffic control actions (including soil moisture and traffic reduction) need to be adopted.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação AgrisusFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Department of Agronomy State University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS), MS 306 Rd, km 6.4Agronomic Institute of Campinas (IAC) Center for Research and Development in Soil and Environmental Resources, Av. Barão de Itapura, 1481Institute for Rural Development - IAPAR-EMATER (IDR-PARANA) Area of Soils (ASO), Rod. Celso Garcia Cid, km 375Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ARTGoiano Federal Institute of Science and Technology (IF Goiano), Campus Rio Verde, P.O. Box 66São Paulo State University School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences Department of Exact Sciences, via de acesso 20 Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/nState University of Campinas (UNICAMP) School of Agricultural Engineering (Feagri), Av. Cândido Rondon, 501São Paulo State University School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences Department of Exact Sciences, via de acesso 20 Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/nFundação Agrisus: 1439/2015FAPESP: 2014/07434-9Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS)Center for Research and Development in Soil and Environmental ResourcesArea of Soils (ASO)ARTGoiano Federal Institute of Science and Technology (IF Goiano)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Guimarães Júnnyor, Wellingthon da SilvaDe Maria, Isabella ClericiAraujo-Junior, Cezar FranciscoDiserens, EtienneSeveriano, Eduardo da CostaFarhate, Camila Viana Vieira [UNESP]Souza, Zigomar Menezes de2022-04-28T19:49:26Z2022-04-28T19:49:26Z2022-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114532Industrial Crops and Products, v. 177.0926-6690http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22322010.1016/j.indcrop.2022.1145322-s2.0-85122631626Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengIndustrial Crops and Productsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:49:26Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223220Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:49:09.319609Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvesting |
title |
Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvesting |
spellingShingle |
Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvesting Guimarães Júnnyor, Wellingthon da Silva Agricultural machine traffic No tillage Precompression stress Soil management systems Sugarcane |
title_short |
Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvesting |
title_full |
Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvesting |
title_fullStr |
Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvesting |
title_full_unstemmed |
Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvesting |
title_sort |
Conservation systems change soil resistance to compaction caused by mechanised harvesting |
author |
Guimarães Júnnyor, Wellingthon da Silva |
author_facet |
Guimarães Júnnyor, Wellingthon da Silva De Maria, Isabella Clerici Araujo-Junior, Cezar Francisco Diserens, Etienne Severiano, Eduardo da Costa Farhate, Camila Viana Vieira [UNESP] Souza, Zigomar Menezes de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
De Maria, Isabella Clerici Araujo-Junior, Cezar Francisco Diserens, Etienne Severiano, Eduardo da Costa Farhate, Camila Viana Vieira [UNESP] Souza, Zigomar Menezes de |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS) Center for Research and Development in Soil and Environmental Resources Area of Soils (ASO) ART Goiano Federal Institute of Science and Technology (IF Goiano) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guimarães Júnnyor, Wellingthon da Silva De Maria, Isabella Clerici Araujo-Junior, Cezar Francisco Diserens, Etienne Severiano, Eduardo da Costa Farhate, Camila Viana Vieira [UNESP] Souza, Zigomar Menezes de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Agricultural machine traffic No tillage Precompression stress Soil management systems Sugarcane |
topic |
Agricultural machine traffic No tillage Precompression stress Soil management systems Sugarcane |
description |
Soil compaction in sugarcane plantation has increased in recent times due to intense mechanization of the production process and the increasing axle load of the machines. As such, there are need to evolve conservation systems which will minimize soil disturbance in sugarcane production thereby preventing soil structure degradation and maintain the soil quality, using appropriate compaction models. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of sugarcane harvesting operation under cover crop management systems and soil tillage practices implemented before sugarcane planting using load-bearing capacity models (LBCM). The experiment was set up in a randomised block design with three soil management systems (no tillage, minimum tillage, and minimum tillage combined with a deep subsoiler) and two crop rotations (peanut and sorghum). Soils samples were collected at three depths before and after sugarcane harvesting. The undisturbed soil samples were submitted to the uniaxial compression test, their precompression stress was determined and, afterwards the load-bearing capacity model for each treatment was developed. The load-bearing capacity models showed soil structure degradation under conventional tillage and pasture management, while there was a recuperative effect of soil structure in crop rotation management. However, peanut as a crop rotation made the soil more susceptible to compaction, regardless of soil tillage treatment. At harvest time, the soil was more susceptible to compaction under the following conditions: in the surface layer, with the use of deep subsoiling and with the use of cover crops (peanuts and sorghum). From a practical point of view, this indicates that the better soil physical condition obtained by soil tillage and the use of cover crops can be wiped out by the harvesting operation, thus traffic control actions (including soil moisture and traffic reduction) need to be adopted. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-28T19:49:26Z 2022-04-28T19:49:26Z 2022-03-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114532 Industrial Crops and Products, v. 177. 0926-6690 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223220 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114532 2-s2.0-85122631626 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114532 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223220 |
identifier_str_mv |
Industrial Crops and Products, v. 177. 0926-6690 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114532 2-s2.0-85122631626 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Industrial Crops and Products |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129252770447360 |