Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Grez, Patricio Agustin Vildósola
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Godoy, Eduardo Fernandez, Fluxá, Patricia Palma, Cortés, Gustavo Adolfo Moncada, Saad, Jose Roberto Cury, Casielles, Javier Martin
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-3225v14n1a02
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/126191
Resumo: AIM: To compare the number of colony forming units CFU and agar adherence of S. mutans on amalgam AM and resin composite RC occlusal restorations. Sixty-five healthy patients older than 18 years with high caries risk who had at least one occlusal AM and RC restorations n=130 were selected. METHODS: The restorations were evaluated according to the alpha Ryge criteria Cohen-Kappa 0.8. For each patient, a biofilm sample was taken using an impression tray technique with previously loaded with solid trypticase yeast extract cysteine sucrose with bacitracin agar placed over the AM restorations and RC restorations in the same patients. The tray was placed inside an oven at 37 °C for 48 h, and the S. mutans count was then performed. Data were analyzed with the test Wilcoxon with a 95% confidence level. RESULTS: RC restorations had statistically significant higher number of CFU of S. mutans than AM restorations p<0.05. CONCLUSIONS: In adult patients with high caries risk, RC occlusal surfaces showed greater agar adherence of S. mutans count than AM restorations.
id UNSP_b136fdc70b44aefff139921b0eb19406
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/126191
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical studyStreptococcus mutanscomposite resinsdental amalgamAIM: To compare the number of colony forming units CFU and agar adherence of S. mutans on amalgam AM and resin composite RC occlusal restorations. Sixty-five healthy patients older than 18 years with high caries risk who had at least one occlusal AM and RC restorations n=130 were selected. METHODS: The restorations were evaluated according to the alpha Ryge criteria Cohen-Kappa 0.8. For each patient, a biofilm sample was taken using an impression tray technique with previously loaded with solid trypticase yeast extract cysteine sucrose with bacitracin agar placed over the AM restorations and RC restorations in the same patients. The tray was placed inside an oven at 37 °C for 48 h, and the S. mutans count was then performed. Data were analyzed with the test Wilcoxon with a 95% confidence level. RESULTS: RC restorations had statistically significant higher number of CFU of S. mutans than AM restorations p<0.05. CONCLUSIONS: In adult patients with high caries risk, RC occlusal surfaces showed greater agar adherence of S. mutans count than AM restorations.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Universidad de Chile Dental School Department of Restorative DentistryUniversidade Estadual Paulista Araraquara Dental School Department of Restorative DentistryUniversidad de Chile Dental School Department Medicine and Oral PathologyUniversidad Mayor Dental SchoolUniversidade Estadual Paulista Araraquara Dental School Department of Restorative DentistryFaculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMPUniversidad de Chile Dental School Department of Restorative DentistryUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidad de Chile Dental School Department Medicine and Oral PathologyUniversidad Mayor Dental SchoolGrez, Patricio Agustin VildósolaGodoy, Eduardo FernandezFluxá, Patricia PalmaCortés, Gustavo Adolfo MoncadaSaad, Jose Roberto CuryCasielles, Javier Martin2015-08-06T16:14:46Z2015-08-06T16:14:46Z2015-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article05-09application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-3225v14n1a02Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences. Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP, v. 14, n. 1, p. 05-09, 2015.1677-3225http://hdl.handle.net/11449/12619110.1590/1677-3225v14n1a02S1677-32252015000100005S1677-32252015000100005.pdf1541792949750106SciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences0,131info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-10T06:04:11Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/126191Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-10-10T06:04:11Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study
title Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study
spellingShingle Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study
Grez, Patricio Agustin Vildósola
Streptococcus mutans
composite resins
dental amalgam
title_short Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study
title_full Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study
title_fullStr Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study
title_sort Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study
author Grez, Patricio Agustin Vildósola
author_facet Grez, Patricio Agustin Vildósola
Godoy, Eduardo Fernandez
Fluxá, Patricia Palma
Cortés, Gustavo Adolfo Moncada
Saad, Jose Roberto Cury
Casielles, Javier Martin
author_role author
author2 Godoy, Eduardo Fernandez
Fluxá, Patricia Palma
Cortés, Gustavo Adolfo Moncada
Saad, Jose Roberto Cury
Casielles, Javier Martin
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Chile Dental School Department of Restorative Dentistry
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidad de Chile Dental School Department Medicine and Oral Pathology
Universidad Mayor Dental School
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Grez, Patricio Agustin Vildósola
Godoy, Eduardo Fernandez
Fluxá, Patricia Palma
Cortés, Gustavo Adolfo Moncada
Saad, Jose Roberto Cury
Casielles, Javier Martin
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Streptococcus mutans
composite resins
dental amalgam
topic Streptococcus mutans
composite resins
dental amalgam
description AIM: To compare the number of colony forming units CFU and agar adherence of S. mutans on amalgam AM and resin composite RC occlusal restorations. Sixty-five healthy patients older than 18 years with high caries risk who had at least one occlusal AM and RC restorations n=130 were selected. METHODS: The restorations were evaluated according to the alpha Ryge criteria Cohen-Kappa 0.8. For each patient, a biofilm sample was taken using an impression tray technique with previously loaded with solid trypticase yeast extract cysteine sucrose with bacitracin agar placed over the AM restorations and RC restorations in the same patients. The tray was placed inside an oven at 37 °C for 48 h, and the S. mutans count was then performed. Data were analyzed with the test Wilcoxon with a 95% confidence level. RESULTS: RC restorations had statistically significant higher number of CFU of S. mutans than AM restorations p<0.05. CONCLUSIONS: In adult patients with high caries risk, RC occlusal surfaces showed greater agar adherence of S. mutans count than AM restorations.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-08-06T16:14:46Z
2015-08-06T16:14:46Z
2015-03-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-3225v14n1a02
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences. Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP, v. 14, n. 1, p. 05-09, 2015.
1677-3225
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/126191
10.1590/1677-3225v14n1a02
S1677-32252015000100005
S1677-32252015000100005.pdf
1541792949750106
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-3225v14n1a02
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/126191
identifier_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences. Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP, v. 14, n. 1, p. 05-09, 2015.
1677-3225
10.1590/1677-3225v14n1a02
S1677-32252015000100005
S1677-32252015000100005.pdf
1541792949750106
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
0,131
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 05-09
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803649370580582400