Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-3225v14n1a02 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/126191 |
Resumo: | AIM: To compare the number of colony forming units CFU and agar adherence of S. mutans on amalgam AM and resin composite RC occlusal restorations. Sixty-five healthy patients older than 18 years with high caries risk who had at least one occlusal AM and RC restorations n=130 were selected. METHODS: The restorations were evaluated according to the alpha Ryge criteria Cohen-Kappa 0.8. For each patient, a biofilm sample was taken using an impression tray technique with previously loaded with solid trypticase yeast extract cysteine sucrose with bacitracin agar placed over the AM restorations and RC restorations in the same patients. The tray was placed inside an oven at 37 °C for 48 h, and the S. mutans count was then performed. Data were analyzed with the test Wilcoxon with a 95% confidence level. RESULTS: RC restorations had statistically significant higher number of CFU of S. mutans than AM restorations p<0.05. CONCLUSIONS: In adult patients with high caries risk, RC occlusal surfaces showed greater agar adherence of S. mutans count than AM restorations. |
id |
UNSP_b136fdc70b44aefff139921b0eb19406 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/126191 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical studyStreptococcus mutanscomposite resinsdental amalgamAIM: To compare the number of colony forming units CFU and agar adherence of S. mutans on amalgam AM and resin composite RC occlusal restorations. Sixty-five healthy patients older than 18 years with high caries risk who had at least one occlusal AM and RC restorations n=130 were selected. METHODS: The restorations were evaluated according to the alpha Ryge criteria Cohen-Kappa 0.8. For each patient, a biofilm sample was taken using an impression tray technique with previously loaded with solid trypticase yeast extract cysteine sucrose with bacitracin agar placed over the AM restorations and RC restorations in the same patients. The tray was placed inside an oven at 37 °C for 48 h, and the S. mutans count was then performed. Data were analyzed with the test Wilcoxon with a 95% confidence level. RESULTS: RC restorations had statistically significant higher number of CFU of S. mutans than AM restorations p<0.05. CONCLUSIONS: In adult patients with high caries risk, RC occlusal surfaces showed greater agar adherence of S. mutans count than AM restorations.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Universidad de Chile Dental School Department of Restorative DentistryUniversidade Estadual Paulista Araraquara Dental School Department of Restorative DentistryUniversidad de Chile Dental School Department Medicine and Oral PathologyUniversidad Mayor Dental SchoolUniversidade Estadual Paulista Araraquara Dental School Department of Restorative DentistryFaculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMPUniversidad de Chile Dental School Department of Restorative DentistryUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidad de Chile Dental School Department Medicine and Oral PathologyUniversidad Mayor Dental SchoolGrez, Patricio Agustin VildósolaGodoy, Eduardo FernandezFluxá, Patricia PalmaCortés, Gustavo Adolfo MoncadaSaad, Jose Roberto CuryCasielles, Javier Martin2015-08-06T16:14:46Z2015-08-06T16:14:46Z2015-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article05-09application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-3225v14n1a02Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences. Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP, v. 14, n. 1, p. 05-09, 2015.1677-3225http://hdl.handle.net/11449/12619110.1590/1677-3225v14n1a02S1677-32252015000100005S1677-32252015000100005.pdf1541792949750106SciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences0,131info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-10T06:04:11Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/126191Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:30:40.544432Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study |
title |
Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study |
spellingShingle |
Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study Grez, Patricio Agustin Vildósola Streptococcus mutans composite resins dental amalgam |
title_short |
Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study |
title_full |
Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study |
title_fullStr |
Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study |
title_sort |
Is there difference of Streptococcus mutans count and adherence on amalgam and resin occlusal restorations? A blind clinical study |
author |
Grez, Patricio Agustin Vildósola |
author_facet |
Grez, Patricio Agustin Vildósola Godoy, Eduardo Fernandez Fluxá, Patricia Palma Cortés, Gustavo Adolfo Moncada Saad, Jose Roberto Cury Casielles, Javier Martin |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Godoy, Eduardo Fernandez Fluxá, Patricia Palma Cortés, Gustavo Adolfo Moncada Saad, Jose Roberto Cury Casielles, Javier Martin |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Chile Dental School Department of Restorative Dentistry Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidad de Chile Dental School Department Medicine and Oral Pathology Universidad Mayor Dental School |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Grez, Patricio Agustin Vildósola Godoy, Eduardo Fernandez Fluxá, Patricia Palma Cortés, Gustavo Adolfo Moncada Saad, Jose Roberto Cury Casielles, Javier Martin |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Streptococcus mutans composite resins dental amalgam |
topic |
Streptococcus mutans composite resins dental amalgam |
description |
AIM: To compare the number of colony forming units CFU and agar adherence of S. mutans on amalgam AM and resin composite RC occlusal restorations. Sixty-five healthy patients older than 18 years with high caries risk who had at least one occlusal AM and RC restorations n=130 were selected. METHODS: The restorations were evaluated according to the alpha Ryge criteria Cohen-Kappa 0.8. For each patient, a biofilm sample was taken using an impression tray technique with previously loaded with solid trypticase yeast extract cysteine sucrose with bacitracin agar placed over the AM restorations and RC restorations in the same patients. The tray was placed inside an oven at 37 °C for 48 h, and the S. mutans count was then performed. Data were analyzed with the test Wilcoxon with a 95% confidence level. RESULTS: RC restorations had statistically significant higher number of CFU of S. mutans than AM restorations p<0.05. CONCLUSIONS: In adult patients with high caries risk, RC occlusal surfaces showed greater agar adherence of S. mutans count than AM restorations. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-08-06T16:14:46Z 2015-08-06T16:14:46Z 2015-03-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-3225v14n1a02 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences. Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP, v. 14, n. 1, p. 05-09, 2015. 1677-3225 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/126191 10.1590/1677-3225v14n1a02 S1677-32252015000100005 S1677-32252015000100005.pdf 1541792949750106 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-3225v14n1a02 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/126191 |
identifier_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences. Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP, v. 14, n. 1, p. 05-09, 2015. 1677-3225 10.1590/1677-3225v14n1a02 S1677-32252015000100005 S1677-32252015000100005.pdf 1541792949750106 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences 0,131 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
05-09 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128371052249088 |