Continuity and discontinuity in the History of Science: Reflections on the historical dimension of the debate
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.15848/hh.v14i37.1783 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223332 |
Resumo: | The theoretical controversy opposing the continuist to the discontinuist perspective occupies a privileged place in debates related to the History of the Historiography of Science. Although considered a contemporary controversy, this is a long-standing dispute. Across history, different thinkers reflected on this subject, mobilizing analytical categories proper to their respective contexts, such as modern science. This article aims to analyze the historicity of this dispute, seeking to measure the historical dimension of some argumentative elements that integrate both traditions. To this end, the text dwells on the historical-conceptual approach, addressing some thinkers involved in the debate. The analysis shows that, despite having become more evident in the 20th century, such a dispute between the continuist and discontinuist traditions may be understood as an unfolding of a much older historical debate. |
id |
UNSP_b5818731282dccb589ec84f939308657 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223332 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Continuity and discontinuity in the History of Science: Reflections on the historical dimension of the debateContinuidade e descontinuidade em História da Ciência: Reflexões sobre a dimensão histórica do debateDiscontinuityHistory of ScienceTheory and History of HistoriographyThe theoretical controversy opposing the continuist to the discontinuist perspective occupies a privileged place in debates related to the History of the Historiography of Science. Although considered a contemporary controversy, this is a long-standing dispute. Across history, different thinkers reflected on this subject, mobilizing analytical categories proper to their respective contexts, such as modern science. This article aims to analyze the historicity of this dispute, seeking to measure the historical dimension of some argumentative elements that integrate both traditions. To this end, the text dwells on the historical-conceptual approach, addressing some thinkers involved in the debate. The analysis shows that, despite having become more evident in the 20th century, such a dispute between the continuist and discontinuist traditions may be understood as an unfolding of a much older historical debate.Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho Faculdade de Ciências e Letras Departamento de História, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho Faculdade de Ciências e Letras Departamento de História, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Da Silva, Luiz Cambraia Karat Gouvêa [UNESP]2022-04-28T19:50:03Z2022-04-28T19:50:03Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article282-311http://dx.doi.org/10.15848/hh.v14i37.1783Historia da Historiografia, v. 14, n. 37, p. 282-311, 2021.1983-9928http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22333210.15848/hh.v14i37.17832-s2.0-85123519669Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporHistoria da Historiografiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:50:03Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223332Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T16:40:11.689882Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Continuity and discontinuity in the History of Science: Reflections on the historical dimension of the debate Continuidade e descontinuidade em História da Ciência: Reflexões sobre a dimensão histórica do debate |
title |
Continuity and discontinuity in the History of Science: Reflections on the historical dimension of the debate |
spellingShingle |
Continuity and discontinuity in the History of Science: Reflections on the historical dimension of the debate Da Silva, Luiz Cambraia Karat Gouvêa [UNESP] Discontinuity History of Science Theory and History of Historiography |
title_short |
Continuity and discontinuity in the History of Science: Reflections on the historical dimension of the debate |
title_full |
Continuity and discontinuity in the History of Science: Reflections on the historical dimension of the debate |
title_fullStr |
Continuity and discontinuity in the History of Science: Reflections on the historical dimension of the debate |
title_full_unstemmed |
Continuity and discontinuity in the History of Science: Reflections on the historical dimension of the debate |
title_sort |
Continuity and discontinuity in the History of Science: Reflections on the historical dimension of the debate |
author |
Da Silva, Luiz Cambraia Karat Gouvêa [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Da Silva, Luiz Cambraia Karat Gouvêa [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Da Silva, Luiz Cambraia Karat Gouvêa [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Discontinuity History of Science Theory and History of Historiography |
topic |
Discontinuity History of Science Theory and History of Historiography |
description |
The theoretical controversy opposing the continuist to the discontinuist perspective occupies a privileged place in debates related to the History of the Historiography of Science. Although considered a contemporary controversy, this is a long-standing dispute. Across history, different thinkers reflected on this subject, mobilizing analytical categories proper to their respective contexts, such as modern science. This article aims to analyze the historicity of this dispute, seeking to measure the historical dimension of some argumentative elements that integrate both traditions. To this end, the text dwells on the historical-conceptual approach, addressing some thinkers involved in the debate. The analysis shows that, despite having become more evident in the 20th century, such a dispute between the continuist and discontinuist traditions may be understood as an unfolding of a much older historical debate. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 2022-04-28T19:50:03Z 2022-04-28T19:50:03Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.15848/hh.v14i37.1783 Historia da Historiografia, v. 14, n. 37, p. 282-311, 2021. 1983-9928 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223332 10.15848/hh.v14i37.1783 2-s2.0-85123519669 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.15848/hh.v14i37.1783 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223332 |
identifier_str_mv |
Historia da Historiografia, v. 14, n. 37, p. 282-311, 2021. 1983-9928 10.15848/hh.v14i37.1783 2-s2.0-85123519669 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Historia da Historiografia |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
282-311 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128685536968704 |