Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Diniz, Adriana Araujo
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Cavalcante, Lourival Ferreira, de Oliveira Filho, Antonio Santana Batista [UNESP], da Silva Dias, Nildo, Dantas, Tony Andreson Guedes, Campos, Vinicius Batista, do Nascimento, José Adeilson Medeiros, Dantas, Stenio Andrey Guedes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18452-9
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223168
Resumo: The use of soil conditioners as bovine biofertilizer associated with mineral fertilization affect the physical and physicochemical quality of passion fruit. For fruit growth, post-harvest quality is crucial for production chain development, as it is the characteristic most used by the fresh consumption market for this fruit. In this sense, an experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of doses of bovine biofertilizer in the soil with and without nitrogen fertilization in the cultivation of yellow passion fruit. A randomized block design was adopted, with three replications in a 5×2 factorial scheme, referring to five doses of liquid bovine biofertilizer (B) diluted in water (A): 0% − control (0B + 4A); 25% (1B + 3A); 50% (2B + 2A); 75% (3B + 1A); and 100% (4B + 0A) with and without nitrogen fertilization applied to the soil. Urea was the nitrogen source used in this study. A total of 10 g plant-1 of N was applied monthly at 30 and 60 days after transplanting, and after that age, 20 g plant-1 was applied until the end of harvest. During the final phase of production and ripening, twelve fruits were harvested from each treatment in physiological maturation for physical and physicochemical characterization. The following analyses were performed: longitudinal diameter, transversal diameter, number of seeds per fruit, peel firmness, pulp yield, fruit peel percentage, pulp pH, soluble solids content; titratable acidity and soluble solids content/titratable acidity ratio. Data underwent analysis of variance by the F test means for nitrogen were compared by Tukey’s test and means for bovine biofertilizer, by regression. Nitrogen enhances the positive effect of bovine biofertilizer on the postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit. The association of biofertilizer and nitrogen improves fruit quality in comparison to plants without these inputs, except for pulp yield and fruit peel percentage, which suffered isolated effects from the factors. High doses of biofertilizer, above 75 and 100%, reduce soluble solids content and increase titratable acidity. The bovine biofertilizer has promising effects, but it does not replace nitrogen fertilization on the postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit.
id UNSP_b7db365f0b2c80b3f0dfd79272d6271f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223168
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogenFruit qualityNitrogen fertilizationOrganic inputsPassiflora edulis SimsSoil conditionersUreaThe use of soil conditioners as bovine biofertilizer associated with mineral fertilization affect the physical and physicochemical quality of passion fruit. For fruit growth, post-harvest quality is crucial for production chain development, as it is the characteristic most used by the fresh consumption market for this fruit. In this sense, an experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of doses of bovine biofertilizer in the soil with and without nitrogen fertilization in the cultivation of yellow passion fruit. A randomized block design was adopted, with three replications in a 5×2 factorial scheme, referring to five doses of liquid bovine biofertilizer (B) diluted in water (A): 0% − control (0B + 4A); 25% (1B + 3A); 50% (2B + 2A); 75% (3B + 1A); and 100% (4B + 0A) with and without nitrogen fertilization applied to the soil. Urea was the nitrogen source used in this study. A total of 10 g plant-1 of N was applied monthly at 30 and 60 days after transplanting, and after that age, 20 g plant-1 was applied until the end of harvest. During the final phase of production and ripening, twelve fruits were harvested from each treatment in physiological maturation for physical and physicochemical characterization. The following analyses were performed: longitudinal diameter, transversal diameter, number of seeds per fruit, peel firmness, pulp yield, fruit peel percentage, pulp pH, soluble solids content; titratable acidity and soluble solids content/titratable acidity ratio. Data underwent analysis of variance by the F test means for nitrogen were compared by Tukey’s test and means for bovine biofertilizer, by regression. Nitrogen enhances the positive effect of bovine biofertilizer on the postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit. The association of biofertilizer and nitrogen improves fruit quality in comparison to plants without these inputs, except for pulp yield and fruit peel percentage, which suffered isolated effects from the factors. High doses of biofertilizer, above 75 and 100%, reduce soluble solids content and increase titratable acidity. The bovine biofertilizer has promising effects, but it does not replace nitrogen fertilization on the postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit.State University of Maranhão (UEMA), Square Gonçalves Dias, s/n, MaranhãoFederal University of Paraíba (UFPB), ParaíbaSão Paulo State University (UNESP), São PauloFederal Rural University of the Semi-arid region (UFERSA), Rio Grande do NorteFederal Institute of Education Science and Technology of Ceará (IFCE), CearáFederal Institute of Education Science and Technology of Paraíba (IFPB), ParaíbaFederal University of Viçosa (UFV), Minas GeraisSão Paulo State University (UNESP), São PauloUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Federal Rural University of the Semi-arid region (UFERSA)Science and Technology of Ceará (IFCE)Science and Technology of Paraíba (IFPB)Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)Diniz, Adriana AraujoCavalcante, Lourival Ferreirade Oliveira Filho, Antonio Santana Batista [UNESP]da Silva Dias, NildoDantas, Tony Andreson GuedesCampos, Vinicius Batistado Nascimento, José Adeilson MedeirosDantas, Stenio Andrey Guedes2022-04-28T19:48:59Z2022-04-28T19:48:59Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18452-9Environmental Science and Pollution Research.1614-74990944-1344http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22316810.1007/s11356-021-18452-92-s2.0-85122257240Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEnvironmental Science and Pollution Researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:48:59Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223168Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:46:49.505168Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen
title Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen
spellingShingle Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen
Diniz, Adriana Araujo
Fruit quality
Nitrogen fertilization
Organic inputs
Passiflora edulis Sims
Soil conditioners
Urea
title_short Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen
title_full Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen
title_fullStr Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen
title_full_unstemmed Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen
title_sort Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen
author Diniz, Adriana Araujo
author_facet Diniz, Adriana Araujo
Cavalcante, Lourival Ferreira
de Oliveira Filho, Antonio Santana Batista [UNESP]
da Silva Dias, Nildo
Dantas, Tony Andreson Guedes
Campos, Vinicius Batista
do Nascimento, José Adeilson Medeiros
Dantas, Stenio Andrey Guedes
author_role author
author2 Cavalcante, Lourival Ferreira
de Oliveira Filho, Antonio Santana Batista [UNESP]
da Silva Dias, Nildo
Dantas, Tony Andreson Guedes
Campos, Vinicius Batista
do Nascimento, José Adeilson Medeiros
Dantas, Stenio Andrey Guedes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Federal Rural University of the Semi-arid region (UFERSA)
Science and Technology of Ceará (IFCE)
Science and Technology of Paraíba (IFPB)
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Diniz, Adriana Araujo
Cavalcante, Lourival Ferreira
de Oliveira Filho, Antonio Santana Batista [UNESP]
da Silva Dias, Nildo
Dantas, Tony Andreson Guedes
Campos, Vinicius Batista
do Nascimento, José Adeilson Medeiros
Dantas, Stenio Andrey Guedes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fruit quality
Nitrogen fertilization
Organic inputs
Passiflora edulis Sims
Soil conditioners
Urea
topic Fruit quality
Nitrogen fertilization
Organic inputs
Passiflora edulis Sims
Soil conditioners
Urea
description The use of soil conditioners as bovine biofertilizer associated with mineral fertilization affect the physical and physicochemical quality of passion fruit. For fruit growth, post-harvest quality is crucial for production chain development, as it is the characteristic most used by the fresh consumption market for this fruit. In this sense, an experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of doses of bovine biofertilizer in the soil with and without nitrogen fertilization in the cultivation of yellow passion fruit. A randomized block design was adopted, with three replications in a 5×2 factorial scheme, referring to five doses of liquid bovine biofertilizer (B) diluted in water (A): 0% − control (0B + 4A); 25% (1B + 3A); 50% (2B + 2A); 75% (3B + 1A); and 100% (4B + 0A) with and without nitrogen fertilization applied to the soil. Urea was the nitrogen source used in this study. A total of 10 g plant-1 of N was applied monthly at 30 and 60 days after transplanting, and after that age, 20 g plant-1 was applied until the end of harvest. During the final phase of production and ripening, twelve fruits were harvested from each treatment in physiological maturation for physical and physicochemical characterization. The following analyses were performed: longitudinal diameter, transversal diameter, number of seeds per fruit, peel firmness, pulp yield, fruit peel percentage, pulp pH, soluble solids content; titratable acidity and soluble solids content/titratable acidity ratio. Data underwent analysis of variance by the F test means for nitrogen were compared by Tukey’s test and means for bovine biofertilizer, by regression. Nitrogen enhances the positive effect of bovine biofertilizer on the postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit. The association of biofertilizer and nitrogen improves fruit quality in comparison to plants without these inputs, except for pulp yield and fruit peel percentage, which suffered isolated effects from the factors. High doses of biofertilizer, above 75 and 100%, reduce soluble solids content and increase titratable acidity. The bovine biofertilizer has promising effects, but it does not replace nitrogen fertilization on the postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-28T19:48:59Z
2022-04-28T19:48:59Z
2022-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18452-9
Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
1614-7499
0944-1344
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223168
10.1007/s11356-021-18452-9
2-s2.0-85122257240
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18452-9
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223168
identifier_str_mv Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
1614-7499
0944-1344
10.1007/s11356-021-18452-9
2-s2.0-85122257240
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Environmental Science and Pollution Research
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129117496803328