Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18452-9 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223168 |
Resumo: | The use of soil conditioners as bovine biofertilizer associated with mineral fertilization affect the physical and physicochemical quality of passion fruit. For fruit growth, post-harvest quality is crucial for production chain development, as it is the characteristic most used by the fresh consumption market for this fruit. In this sense, an experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of doses of bovine biofertilizer in the soil with and without nitrogen fertilization in the cultivation of yellow passion fruit. A randomized block design was adopted, with three replications in a 5×2 factorial scheme, referring to five doses of liquid bovine biofertilizer (B) diluted in water (A): 0% − control (0B + 4A); 25% (1B + 3A); 50% (2B + 2A); 75% (3B + 1A); and 100% (4B + 0A) with and without nitrogen fertilization applied to the soil. Urea was the nitrogen source used in this study. A total of 10 g plant-1 of N was applied monthly at 30 and 60 days after transplanting, and after that age, 20 g plant-1 was applied until the end of harvest. During the final phase of production and ripening, twelve fruits were harvested from each treatment in physiological maturation for physical and physicochemical characterization. The following analyses were performed: longitudinal diameter, transversal diameter, number of seeds per fruit, peel firmness, pulp yield, fruit peel percentage, pulp pH, soluble solids content; titratable acidity and soluble solids content/titratable acidity ratio. Data underwent analysis of variance by the F test means for nitrogen were compared by Tukey’s test and means for bovine biofertilizer, by regression. Nitrogen enhances the positive effect of bovine biofertilizer on the postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit. The association of biofertilizer and nitrogen improves fruit quality in comparison to plants without these inputs, except for pulp yield and fruit peel percentage, which suffered isolated effects from the factors. High doses of biofertilizer, above 75 and 100%, reduce soluble solids content and increase titratable acidity. The bovine biofertilizer has promising effects, but it does not replace nitrogen fertilization on the postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit. |
id |
UNSP_b7db365f0b2c80b3f0dfd79272d6271f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223168 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogenFruit qualityNitrogen fertilizationOrganic inputsPassiflora edulis SimsSoil conditionersUreaThe use of soil conditioners as bovine biofertilizer associated with mineral fertilization affect the physical and physicochemical quality of passion fruit. For fruit growth, post-harvest quality is crucial for production chain development, as it is the characteristic most used by the fresh consumption market for this fruit. In this sense, an experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of doses of bovine biofertilizer in the soil with and without nitrogen fertilization in the cultivation of yellow passion fruit. A randomized block design was adopted, with three replications in a 5×2 factorial scheme, referring to five doses of liquid bovine biofertilizer (B) diluted in water (A): 0% − control (0B + 4A); 25% (1B + 3A); 50% (2B + 2A); 75% (3B + 1A); and 100% (4B + 0A) with and without nitrogen fertilization applied to the soil. Urea was the nitrogen source used in this study. A total of 10 g plant-1 of N was applied monthly at 30 and 60 days after transplanting, and after that age, 20 g plant-1 was applied until the end of harvest. During the final phase of production and ripening, twelve fruits were harvested from each treatment in physiological maturation for physical and physicochemical characterization. The following analyses were performed: longitudinal diameter, transversal diameter, number of seeds per fruit, peel firmness, pulp yield, fruit peel percentage, pulp pH, soluble solids content; titratable acidity and soluble solids content/titratable acidity ratio. Data underwent analysis of variance by the F test means for nitrogen were compared by Tukey’s test and means for bovine biofertilizer, by regression. Nitrogen enhances the positive effect of bovine biofertilizer on the postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit. The association of biofertilizer and nitrogen improves fruit quality in comparison to plants without these inputs, except for pulp yield and fruit peel percentage, which suffered isolated effects from the factors. High doses of biofertilizer, above 75 and 100%, reduce soluble solids content and increase titratable acidity. The bovine biofertilizer has promising effects, but it does not replace nitrogen fertilization on the postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit.State University of Maranhão (UEMA), Square Gonçalves Dias, s/n, MaranhãoFederal University of Paraíba (UFPB), ParaíbaSão Paulo State University (UNESP), São PauloFederal Rural University of the Semi-arid region (UFERSA), Rio Grande do NorteFederal Institute of Education Science and Technology of Ceará (IFCE), CearáFederal Institute of Education Science and Technology of Paraíba (IFPB), ParaíbaFederal University of Viçosa (UFV), Minas GeraisSão Paulo State University (UNESP), São PauloUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Federal Rural University of the Semi-arid region (UFERSA)Science and Technology of Ceará (IFCE)Science and Technology of Paraíba (IFPB)Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)Diniz, Adriana AraujoCavalcante, Lourival Ferreirade Oliveira Filho, Antonio Santana Batista [UNESP]da Silva Dias, NildoDantas, Tony Andreson GuedesCampos, Vinicius Batistado Nascimento, José Adeilson MedeirosDantas, Stenio Andrey Guedes2022-04-28T19:48:59Z2022-04-28T19:48:59Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18452-9Environmental Science and Pollution Research.1614-74990944-1344http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22316810.1007/s11356-021-18452-92-s2.0-85122257240Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEnvironmental Science and Pollution Researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:48:59Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223168Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:46:49.505168Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen |
title |
Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen |
spellingShingle |
Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen Diniz, Adriana Araujo Fruit quality Nitrogen fertilization Organic inputs Passiflora edulis Sims Soil conditioners Urea |
title_short |
Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen |
title_full |
Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen |
title_fullStr |
Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen |
title_full_unstemmed |
Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen |
title_sort |
Postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit produced in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen |
author |
Diniz, Adriana Araujo |
author_facet |
Diniz, Adriana Araujo Cavalcante, Lourival Ferreira de Oliveira Filho, Antonio Santana Batista [UNESP] da Silva Dias, Nildo Dantas, Tony Andreson Guedes Campos, Vinicius Batista do Nascimento, José Adeilson Medeiros Dantas, Stenio Andrey Guedes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cavalcante, Lourival Ferreira de Oliveira Filho, Antonio Santana Batista [UNESP] da Silva Dias, Nildo Dantas, Tony Andreson Guedes Campos, Vinicius Batista do Nascimento, José Adeilson Medeiros Dantas, Stenio Andrey Guedes |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Federal Rural University of the Semi-arid region (UFERSA) Science and Technology of Ceará (IFCE) Science and Technology of Paraíba (IFPB) Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Diniz, Adriana Araujo Cavalcante, Lourival Ferreira de Oliveira Filho, Antonio Santana Batista [UNESP] da Silva Dias, Nildo Dantas, Tony Andreson Guedes Campos, Vinicius Batista do Nascimento, José Adeilson Medeiros Dantas, Stenio Andrey Guedes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fruit quality Nitrogen fertilization Organic inputs Passiflora edulis Sims Soil conditioners Urea |
topic |
Fruit quality Nitrogen fertilization Organic inputs Passiflora edulis Sims Soil conditioners Urea |
description |
The use of soil conditioners as bovine biofertilizer associated with mineral fertilization affect the physical and physicochemical quality of passion fruit. For fruit growth, post-harvest quality is crucial for production chain development, as it is the characteristic most used by the fresh consumption market for this fruit. In this sense, an experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of doses of bovine biofertilizer in the soil with and without nitrogen fertilization in the cultivation of yellow passion fruit. A randomized block design was adopted, with three replications in a 5×2 factorial scheme, referring to five doses of liquid bovine biofertilizer (B) diluted in water (A): 0% − control (0B + 4A); 25% (1B + 3A); 50% (2B + 2A); 75% (3B + 1A); and 100% (4B + 0A) with and without nitrogen fertilization applied to the soil. Urea was the nitrogen source used in this study. A total of 10 g plant-1 of N was applied monthly at 30 and 60 days after transplanting, and after that age, 20 g plant-1 was applied until the end of harvest. During the final phase of production and ripening, twelve fruits were harvested from each treatment in physiological maturation for physical and physicochemical characterization. The following analyses were performed: longitudinal diameter, transversal diameter, number of seeds per fruit, peel firmness, pulp yield, fruit peel percentage, pulp pH, soluble solids content; titratable acidity and soluble solids content/titratable acidity ratio. Data underwent analysis of variance by the F test means for nitrogen were compared by Tukey’s test and means for bovine biofertilizer, by regression. Nitrogen enhances the positive effect of bovine biofertilizer on the postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit. The association of biofertilizer and nitrogen improves fruit quality in comparison to plants without these inputs, except for pulp yield and fruit peel percentage, which suffered isolated effects from the factors. High doses of biofertilizer, above 75 and 100%, reduce soluble solids content and increase titratable acidity. The bovine biofertilizer has promising effects, but it does not replace nitrogen fertilization on the postharvest quality of yellow passion fruit. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-28T19:48:59Z 2022-04-28T19:48:59Z 2022-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18452-9 Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 1614-7499 0944-1344 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223168 10.1007/s11356-021-18452-9 2-s2.0-85122257240 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18452-9 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223168 |
identifier_str_mv |
Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 1614-7499 0944-1344 10.1007/s11356-021-18452-9 2-s2.0-85122257240 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Environmental Science and Pollution Research |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129117496803328 |