Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.527812 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206847 |
Resumo: | Epidural anesthesia minimizes perioperative pain in dogs. It is considered that epidural solution dispersion in cadavers is similar to alive dogs. The objective of the anatomical study was to compare the dispersion of 0.2 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and iohexol via lumbar epidural (L1–L2) under fluoroscopic guidance in 10 thawed cadavers (GC) and 13 female dogs (G0.25) (5–15 kg; body score 4/5). The objective of the clinical study was to evaluate postoperative analgesic consumption and sedation for 6 h after extubation of dogs submitted to ovariohysterectomy when using 0.25% (G0.25; n = 10) bupivacaine with the intraoperative use of fentanyl (GF; n = 10). Parametric data were compared by the t-test and non-parametric data by the Mann Whitney test. Pain and sedation scores were evaluated over time by the Friedman test, followed by the Dunn test. Alive dogs presented greater epidural dispersion (17 ± 3 vertebrae) than thawed cadavers (11 ± 4 vertebrae; p = 0.002). All dogs treated with fentanyl and only one dog treated with 0.25% epidural bupivacaine presented pain scores above the cut-off point of the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale Short-Form (GCMPS-SF) and required postoperative rescue analgesia up to 6 h after extubation. The sedation score was higher at all postoperative moments compared to preoperative moments in the G0.25 and GF, except for evaluations performed at 5 and 6 h after extubation in the GF. Greater sedation was observed immediately after extubation in the GF compared to the G0.25, and there was greater sedation in the G0.25 compared to the GF from 3 to 6 h after extubation. The conclusion of the anatomical study was that L1–L2 epidural bupivacaine dispersion is lower in canine thawed cadavers than in alive dogs. Conclusion of the clinical study was that lumbar epidural anesthesia improved postoperative analgesia and produced longer postoperative sedation when compared to fentanyl. |
id |
UNSP_bb93125b2eec61e37dd491484dc2248b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206847 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomyanalgesiaanesthesiadoglocal anestheticlocoregional anesthesialumbar epidural anesthesianeuroaxispainEpidural anesthesia minimizes perioperative pain in dogs. It is considered that epidural solution dispersion in cadavers is similar to alive dogs. The objective of the anatomical study was to compare the dispersion of 0.2 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and iohexol via lumbar epidural (L1–L2) under fluoroscopic guidance in 10 thawed cadavers (GC) and 13 female dogs (G0.25) (5–15 kg; body score 4/5). The objective of the clinical study was to evaluate postoperative analgesic consumption and sedation for 6 h after extubation of dogs submitted to ovariohysterectomy when using 0.25% (G0.25; n = 10) bupivacaine with the intraoperative use of fentanyl (GF; n = 10). Parametric data were compared by the t-test and non-parametric data by the Mann Whitney test. Pain and sedation scores were evaluated over time by the Friedman test, followed by the Dunn test. Alive dogs presented greater epidural dispersion (17 ± 3 vertebrae) than thawed cadavers (11 ± 4 vertebrae; p = 0.002). All dogs treated with fentanyl and only one dog treated with 0.25% epidural bupivacaine presented pain scores above the cut-off point of the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale Short-Form (GCMPS-SF) and required postoperative rescue analgesia up to 6 h after extubation. The sedation score was higher at all postoperative moments compared to preoperative moments in the G0.25 and GF, except for evaluations performed at 5 and 6 h after extubation in the GF. Greater sedation was observed immediately after extubation in the GF compared to the G0.25, and there was greater sedation in the G0.25 compared to the GF from 3 to 6 h after extubation. The conclusion of the anatomical study was that L1–L2 epidural bupivacaine dispersion is lower in canine thawed cadavers than in alive dogs. Conclusion of the clinical study was that lumbar epidural anesthesia improved postoperative analgesia and produced longer postoperative sedation when compared to fentanyl.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Department of Anesthesiology Medical School São Paulo State University (Unesp)School of Veterinary Medicine São Judas Tadeu UniversityDepartment of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science São Paulo State University (Unesp)Department of Anesthesiology Medical School São Paulo State University (Unesp)Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science São Paulo State University (Unesp)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)São Judas Tadeu UniversityCima, Daniela Santilli [UNESP]Credie, Leonardo de Freitas Guimarães ArcoverdeFutema, FábioLuna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:44:51Z2021-06-25T10:44:51Z2020-11-03info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.527812Frontiers in Veterinary Science, v. 7.2297-1769http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20684710.3389/fvets.2020.5278122-s2.0-85096229631Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengFrontiers in Veterinary Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-09T14:06:17Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206847Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-09T14:06:17Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy |
title |
Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy |
spellingShingle |
Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy Cima, Daniela Santilli [UNESP] analgesia anesthesia dog local anesthetic locoregional anesthesia lumbar epidural anesthesia neuroaxis pain |
title_short |
Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy |
title_full |
Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy |
title_fullStr |
Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy |
title_sort |
Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy |
author |
Cima, Daniela Santilli [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Cima, Daniela Santilli [UNESP] Credie, Leonardo de Freitas Guimarães Arcoverde Futema, Fábio Luna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Credie, Leonardo de Freitas Guimarães Arcoverde Futema, Fábio Luna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) São Judas Tadeu University |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cima, Daniela Santilli [UNESP] Credie, Leonardo de Freitas Guimarães Arcoverde Futema, Fábio Luna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
analgesia anesthesia dog local anesthetic locoregional anesthesia lumbar epidural anesthesia neuroaxis pain |
topic |
analgesia anesthesia dog local anesthetic locoregional anesthesia lumbar epidural anesthesia neuroaxis pain |
description |
Epidural anesthesia minimizes perioperative pain in dogs. It is considered that epidural solution dispersion in cadavers is similar to alive dogs. The objective of the anatomical study was to compare the dispersion of 0.2 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and iohexol via lumbar epidural (L1–L2) under fluoroscopic guidance in 10 thawed cadavers (GC) and 13 female dogs (G0.25) (5–15 kg; body score 4/5). The objective of the clinical study was to evaluate postoperative analgesic consumption and sedation for 6 h after extubation of dogs submitted to ovariohysterectomy when using 0.25% (G0.25; n = 10) bupivacaine with the intraoperative use of fentanyl (GF; n = 10). Parametric data were compared by the t-test and non-parametric data by the Mann Whitney test. Pain and sedation scores were evaluated over time by the Friedman test, followed by the Dunn test. Alive dogs presented greater epidural dispersion (17 ± 3 vertebrae) than thawed cadavers (11 ± 4 vertebrae; p = 0.002). All dogs treated with fentanyl and only one dog treated with 0.25% epidural bupivacaine presented pain scores above the cut-off point of the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale Short-Form (GCMPS-SF) and required postoperative rescue analgesia up to 6 h after extubation. The sedation score was higher at all postoperative moments compared to preoperative moments in the G0.25 and GF, except for evaluations performed at 5 and 6 h after extubation in the GF. Greater sedation was observed immediately after extubation in the GF compared to the G0.25, and there was greater sedation in the G0.25 compared to the GF from 3 to 6 h after extubation. The conclusion of the anatomical study was that L1–L2 epidural bupivacaine dispersion is lower in canine thawed cadavers than in alive dogs. Conclusion of the clinical study was that lumbar epidural anesthesia improved postoperative analgesia and produced longer postoperative sedation when compared to fentanyl. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-03 2021-06-25T10:44:51Z 2021-06-25T10:44:51Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.527812 Frontiers in Veterinary Science, v. 7. 2297-1769 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206847 10.3389/fvets.2020.527812 2-s2.0-85096229631 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.527812 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206847 |
identifier_str_mv |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, v. 7. 2297-1769 10.3389/fvets.2020.527812 2-s2.0-85096229631 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546619431288832 |