Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cima, Daniela Santilli [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Credie, Leonardo de Freitas Guimarães Arcoverde, Futema, Fábio, Luna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.527812
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206847
Resumo: Epidural anesthesia minimizes perioperative pain in dogs. It is considered that epidural solution dispersion in cadavers is similar to alive dogs. The objective of the anatomical study was to compare the dispersion of 0.2 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and iohexol via lumbar epidural (L1–L2) under fluoroscopic guidance in 10 thawed cadavers (GC) and 13 female dogs (G0.25) (5–15 kg; body score 4/5). The objective of the clinical study was to evaluate postoperative analgesic consumption and sedation for 6 h after extubation of dogs submitted to ovariohysterectomy when using 0.25% (G0.25; n = 10) bupivacaine with the intraoperative use of fentanyl (GF; n = 10). Parametric data were compared by the t-test and non-parametric data by the Mann Whitney test. Pain and sedation scores were evaluated over time by the Friedman test, followed by the Dunn test. Alive dogs presented greater epidural dispersion (17 ± 3 vertebrae) than thawed cadavers (11 ± 4 vertebrae; p = 0.002). All dogs treated with fentanyl and only one dog treated with 0.25% epidural bupivacaine presented pain scores above the cut-off point of the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale Short-Form (GCMPS-SF) and required postoperative rescue analgesia up to 6 h after extubation. The sedation score was higher at all postoperative moments compared to preoperative moments in the G0.25 and GF, except for evaluations performed at 5 and 6 h after extubation in the GF. Greater sedation was observed immediately after extubation in the GF compared to the G0.25, and there was greater sedation in the G0.25 compared to the GF from 3 to 6 h after extubation. The conclusion of the anatomical study was that L1–L2 epidural bupivacaine dispersion is lower in canine thawed cadavers than in alive dogs. Conclusion of the clinical study was that lumbar epidural anesthesia improved postoperative analgesia and produced longer postoperative sedation when compared to fentanyl.
id UNSP_bb93125b2eec61e37dd491484dc2248b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206847
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomyanalgesiaanesthesiadoglocal anestheticlocoregional anesthesialumbar epidural anesthesianeuroaxispainEpidural anesthesia minimizes perioperative pain in dogs. It is considered that epidural solution dispersion in cadavers is similar to alive dogs. The objective of the anatomical study was to compare the dispersion of 0.2 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and iohexol via lumbar epidural (L1–L2) under fluoroscopic guidance in 10 thawed cadavers (GC) and 13 female dogs (G0.25) (5–15 kg; body score 4/5). The objective of the clinical study was to evaluate postoperative analgesic consumption and sedation for 6 h after extubation of dogs submitted to ovariohysterectomy when using 0.25% (G0.25; n = 10) bupivacaine with the intraoperative use of fentanyl (GF; n = 10). Parametric data were compared by the t-test and non-parametric data by the Mann Whitney test. Pain and sedation scores were evaluated over time by the Friedman test, followed by the Dunn test. Alive dogs presented greater epidural dispersion (17 ± 3 vertebrae) than thawed cadavers (11 ± 4 vertebrae; p = 0.002). All dogs treated with fentanyl and only one dog treated with 0.25% epidural bupivacaine presented pain scores above the cut-off point of the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale Short-Form (GCMPS-SF) and required postoperative rescue analgesia up to 6 h after extubation. The sedation score was higher at all postoperative moments compared to preoperative moments in the G0.25 and GF, except for evaluations performed at 5 and 6 h after extubation in the GF. Greater sedation was observed immediately after extubation in the GF compared to the G0.25, and there was greater sedation in the G0.25 compared to the GF from 3 to 6 h after extubation. The conclusion of the anatomical study was that L1–L2 epidural bupivacaine dispersion is lower in canine thawed cadavers than in alive dogs. Conclusion of the clinical study was that lumbar epidural anesthesia improved postoperative analgesia and produced longer postoperative sedation when compared to fentanyl.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Department of Anesthesiology Medical School São Paulo State University (Unesp)School of Veterinary Medicine São Judas Tadeu UniversityDepartment of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science São Paulo State University (Unesp)Department of Anesthesiology Medical School São Paulo State University (Unesp)Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science São Paulo State University (Unesp)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)São Judas Tadeu UniversityCima, Daniela Santilli [UNESP]Credie, Leonardo de Freitas Guimarães ArcoverdeFutema, FábioLuna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:44:51Z2021-06-25T10:44:51Z2020-11-03info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.527812Frontiers in Veterinary Science, v. 7.2297-1769http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20684710.3389/fvets.2020.5278122-s2.0-85096229631Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengFrontiers in Veterinary Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-09T14:06:17Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206847Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-09T14:06:17Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy
title Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy
spellingShingle Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy
Cima, Daniela Santilli [UNESP]
analgesia
anesthesia
dog
local anesthetic
locoregional anesthesia
lumbar epidural anesthesia
neuroaxis
pain
title_short Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy
title_full Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy
title_fullStr Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy
title_full_unstemmed Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy
title_sort Lumbar Epidural: Anatomical and Clinical Study in Dogs Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy
author Cima, Daniela Santilli [UNESP]
author_facet Cima, Daniela Santilli [UNESP]
Credie, Leonardo de Freitas Guimarães Arcoverde
Futema, Fábio
Luna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Credie, Leonardo de Freitas Guimarães Arcoverde
Futema, Fábio
Luna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
São Judas Tadeu University
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cima, Daniela Santilli [UNESP]
Credie, Leonardo de Freitas Guimarães Arcoverde
Futema, Fábio
Luna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv analgesia
anesthesia
dog
local anesthetic
locoregional anesthesia
lumbar epidural anesthesia
neuroaxis
pain
topic analgesia
anesthesia
dog
local anesthetic
locoregional anesthesia
lumbar epidural anesthesia
neuroaxis
pain
description Epidural anesthesia minimizes perioperative pain in dogs. It is considered that epidural solution dispersion in cadavers is similar to alive dogs. The objective of the anatomical study was to compare the dispersion of 0.2 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and iohexol via lumbar epidural (L1–L2) under fluoroscopic guidance in 10 thawed cadavers (GC) and 13 female dogs (G0.25) (5–15 kg; body score 4/5). The objective of the clinical study was to evaluate postoperative analgesic consumption and sedation for 6 h after extubation of dogs submitted to ovariohysterectomy when using 0.25% (G0.25; n = 10) bupivacaine with the intraoperative use of fentanyl (GF; n = 10). Parametric data were compared by the t-test and non-parametric data by the Mann Whitney test. Pain and sedation scores were evaluated over time by the Friedman test, followed by the Dunn test. Alive dogs presented greater epidural dispersion (17 ± 3 vertebrae) than thawed cadavers (11 ± 4 vertebrae; p = 0.002). All dogs treated with fentanyl and only one dog treated with 0.25% epidural bupivacaine presented pain scores above the cut-off point of the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale Short-Form (GCMPS-SF) and required postoperative rescue analgesia up to 6 h after extubation. The sedation score was higher at all postoperative moments compared to preoperative moments in the G0.25 and GF, except for evaluations performed at 5 and 6 h after extubation in the GF. Greater sedation was observed immediately after extubation in the GF compared to the G0.25, and there was greater sedation in the G0.25 compared to the GF from 3 to 6 h after extubation. The conclusion of the anatomical study was that L1–L2 epidural bupivacaine dispersion is lower in canine thawed cadavers than in alive dogs. Conclusion of the clinical study was that lumbar epidural anesthesia improved postoperative analgesia and produced longer postoperative sedation when compared to fentanyl.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-03
2021-06-25T10:44:51Z
2021-06-25T10:44:51Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.527812
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, v. 7.
2297-1769
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206847
10.3389/fvets.2020.527812
2-s2.0-85096229631
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.527812
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206847
identifier_str_mv Frontiers in Veterinary Science, v. 7.
2297-1769
10.3389/fvets.2020.527812
2-s2.0-85096229631
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers in Veterinary Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546619431288832