Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nagata, Walter Bertequini [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: da Cruz Panegossi, Mariele Fernanda [UNESP], Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP], Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira, Kaneto, Carlos Noriuki [UNESP], Perri, Sílvia Helena Venturoli [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.10.001
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190091
Resumo: This study evaluated the efficacy of commercially available anthelmintic drugs by calculating the percent reduction of eggs per gram (EPGR%) and appropriate statistical tests. A total of 350 animals selected from five commercial sheep farms was divided in seven groups with 10 animals each: Group 1 - control, Group 2 - Albendazole (5 mg/kg); Group 3 - Levamisole hydrochloride (5 mg/kg); Group 4 - Ivermectin (0.2 mg/kg); Group 5 - Moxidectin (0.2 mg/kg); and Group 6 - Closantel (10 mg/kg); Group 7 - Ivermectin + Levamisole + Albendazole (200 mcg/kg Ivermectin, 7.5 mg/kg Levamisole and 5 mg/kg Albendazole). EPG percent reduction was determined between day zero and day 10 after treatment had started and compared between groups. It was observed that, practically, almost all the tested drugs had some level of parasitic resistance while Moxidectin was the most effective during treatment. The results show that more sustainable procedures such as pasture rotation system, plant‑based products, certain fungi and earthworms need to be adopted to reduce parasitism and anthelmintic resistance in ovine herds.
id UNSP_d0a1b0c0585f5bc5ad4545e0a4cbbfce
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190091
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, BrazilAnthelminticEfficacyIntestinal wormsSheepThis study evaluated the efficacy of commercially available anthelmintic drugs by calculating the percent reduction of eggs per gram (EPGR%) and appropriate statistical tests. A total of 350 animals selected from five commercial sheep farms was divided in seven groups with 10 animals each: Group 1 - control, Group 2 - Albendazole (5 mg/kg); Group 3 - Levamisole hydrochloride (5 mg/kg); Group 4 - Ivermectin (0.2 mg/kg); Group 5 - Moxidectin (0.2 mg/kg); and Group 6 - Closantel (10 mg/kg); Group 7 - Ivermectin + Levamisole + Albendazole (200 mcg/kg Ivermectin, 7.5 mg/kg Levamisole and 5 mg/kg Albendazole). EPG percent reduction was determined between day zero and day 10 after treatment had started and compared between groups. It was observed that, practically, almost all the tested drugs had some level of parasitic resistance while Moxidectin was the most effective during treatment. The results show that more sustainable procedures such as pasture rotation system, plant‑based products, certain fungi and earthworms need to be adopted to reduce parasitism and anthelmintic resistance in ovine herds.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Araçatuba, R. Clóvis Pestana 793, Bairro IpanemaUNICAMP Universidade Estadual de Campinas Departamento de Sistemas de Informação do Instituto de Computação da UNICAMP LIDS – Laboratory of Image Data Science, CampinasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Araçatuba, R. Clóvis Pestana 793, Bairro IpanemaFAPESP: 2011/12648-0Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Nagata, Walter Bertequini [UNESP]da Cruz Panegossi, Mariele Fernanda [UNESP]Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP]Gomes, Jancarlo FerreiraKaneto, Carlos Noriuki [UNESP]Perri, Sílvia Helena Venturoli [UNESP]2019-10-06T17:02:00Z2019-10-06T17:02:00Z2019-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article48-50http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.10.001Small Ruminant Research, v. 172, p. 48-50.0921-4488http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19009110.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.10.0012-s2.0-85061105897Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengSmall Ruminant Researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-04T19:15:38Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190091Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-04T19:15:38Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, Brazil
title Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, Brazil
spellingShingle Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, Brazil
Nagata, Walter Bertequini [UNESP]
Anthelmintic
Efficacy
Intestinal worms
Sheep
title_short Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, Brazil
title_full Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, Brazil
title_fullStr Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, Brazil
title_sort Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, Brazil
author Nagata, Walter Bertequini [UNESP]
author_facet Nagata, Walter Bertequini [UNESP]
da Cruz Panegossi, Mariele Fernanda [UNESP]
Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP]
Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira
Kaneto, Carlos Noriuki [UNESP]
Perri, Sílvia Helena Venturoli [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 da Cruz Panegossi, Mariele Fernanda [UNESP]
Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP]
Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira
Kaneto, Carlos Noriuki [UNESP]
Perri, Sílvia Helena Venturoli [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nagata, Walter Bertequini [UNESP]
da Cruz Panegossi, Mariele Fernanda [UNESP]
Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP]
Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira
Kaneto, Carlos Noriuki [UNESP]
Perri, Sílvia Helena Venturoli [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Anthelmintic
Efficacy
Intestinal worms
Sheep
topic Anthelmintic
Efficacy
Intestinal worms
Sheep
description This study evaluated the efficacy of commercially available anthelmintic drugs by calculating the percent reduction of eggs per gram (EPGR%) and appropriate statistical tests. A total of 350 animals selected from five commercial sheep farms was divided in seven groups with 10 animals each: Group 1 - control, Group 2 - Albendazole (5 mg/kg); Group 3 - Levamisole hydrochloride (5 mg/kg); Group 4 - Ivermectin (0.2 mg/kg); Group 5 - Moxidectin (0.2 mg/kg); and Group 6 - Closantel (10 mg/kg); Group 7 - Ivermectin + Levamisole + Albendazole (200 mcg/kg Ivermectin, 7.5 mg/kg Levamisole and 5 mg/kg Albendazole). EPG percent reduction was determined between day zero and day 10 after treatment had started and compared between groups. It was observed that, practically, almost all the tested drugs had some level of parasitic resistance while Moxidectin was the most effective during treatment. The results show that more sustainable procedures such as pasture rotation system, plant‑based products, certain fungi and earthworms need to be adopted to reduce parasitism and anthelmintic resistance in ovine herds.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-06T17:02:00Z
2019-10-06T17:02:00Z
2019-03-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.10.001
Small Ruminant Research, v. 172, p. 48-50.
0921-4488
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190091
10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.10.001
2-s2.0-85061105897
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.10.001
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190091
identifier_str_mv Small Ruminant Research, v. 172, p. 48-50.
0921-4488
10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.10.001
2-s2.0-85061105897
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Small Ruminant Research
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 48-50
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1810021389950779392