Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.10.001 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190091 |
Resumo: | This study evaluated the efficacy of commercially available anthelmintic drugs by calculating the percent reduction of eggs per gram (EPGR%) and appropriate statistical tests. A total of 350 animals selected from five commercial sheep farms was divided in seven groups with 10 animals each: Group 1 - control, Group 2 - Albendazole (5 mg/kg); Group 3 - Levamisole hydrochloride (5 mg/kg); Group 4 - Ivermectin (0.2 mg/kg); Group 5 - Moxidectin (0.2 mg/kg); and Group 6 - Closantel (10 mg/kg); Group 7 - Ivermectin + Levamisole + Albendazole (200 mcg/kg Ivermectin, 7.5 mg/kg Levamisole and 5 mg/kg Albendazole). EPG percent reduction was determined between day zero and day 10 after treatment had started and compared between groups. It was observed that, practically, almost all the tested drugs had some level of parasitic resistance while Moxidectin was the most effective during treatment. The results show that more sustainable procedures such as pasture rotation system, plant‑based products, certain fungi and earthworms need to be adopted to reduce parasitism and anthelmintic resistance in ovine herds. |
id |
UNSP_d0a1b0c0585f5bc5ad4545e0a4cbbfce |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190091 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, BrazilAnthelminticEfficacyIntestinal wormsSheepThis study evaluated the efficacy of commercially available anthelmintic drugs by calculating the percent reduction of eggs per gram (EPGR%) and appropriate statistical tests. A total of 350 animals selected from five commercial sheep farms was divided in seven groups with 10 animals each: Group 1 - control, Group 2 - Albendazole (5 mg/kg); Group 3 - Levamisole hydrochloride (5 mg/kg); Group 4 - Ivermectin (0.2 mg/kg); Group 5 - Moxidectin (0.2 mg/kg); and Group 6 - Closantel (10 mg/kg); Group 7 - Ivermectin + Levamisole + Albendazole (200 mcg/kg Ivermectin, 7.5 mg/kg Levamisole and 5 mg/kg Albendazole). EPG percent reduction was determined between day zero and day 10 after treatment had started and compared between groups. It was observed that, practically, almost all the tested drugs had some level of parasitic resistance while Moxidectin was the most effective during treatment. The results show that more sustainable procedures such as pasture rotation system, plant‑based products, certain fungi and earthworms need to be adopted to reduce parasitism and anthelmintic resistance in ovine herds.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Araçatuba, R. Clóvis Pestana 793, Bairro IpanemaUNICAMP Universidade Estadual de Campinas Departamento de Sistemas de Informação do Instituto de Computação da UNICAMP LIDS – Laboratory of Image Data Science, CampinasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Araçatuba, R. Clóvis Pestana 793, Bairro IpanemaFAPESP: 2011/12648-0Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Nagata, Walter Bertequini [UNESP]da Cruz Panegossi, Mariele Fernanda [UNESP]Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP]Gomes, Jancarlo FerreiraKaneto, Carlos Noriuki [UNESP]Perri, Sílvia Helena Venturoli [UNESP]2019-10-06T17:02:00Z2019-10-06T17:02:00Z2019-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article48-50http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.10.001Small Ruminant Research, v. 172, p. 48-50.0921-4488http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19009110.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.10.0012-s2.0-85061105897Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengSmall Ruminant Researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-04T19:15:38Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/190091Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-04T19:15:38Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, Brazil |
title |
Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, Brazil Nagata, Walter Bertequini [UNESP] Anthelmintic Efficacy Intestinal worms Sheep |
title_short |
Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, Brazil |
title_full |
Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, Brazil |
title_sort |
Resistance of gastrointestinal nematodes to five different active principles in sheep infected naturally in São Paulo State, Brazil |
author |
Nagata, Walter Bertequini [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Nagata, Walter Bertequini [UNESP] da Cruz Panegossi, Mariele Fernanda [UNESP] Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP] Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira Kaneto, Carlos Noriuki [UNESP] Perri, Sílvia Helena Venturoli [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
da Cruz Panegossi, Mariele Fernanda [UNESP] Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP] Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira Kaneto, Carlos Noriuki [UNESP] Perri, Sílvia Helena Venturoli [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nagata, Walter Bertequini [UNESP] da Cruz Panegossi, Mariele Fernanda [UNESP] Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP] Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira Kaneto, Carlos Noriuki [UNESP] Perri, Sílvia Helena Venturoli [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Anthelmintic Efficacy Intestinal worms Sheep |
topic |
Anthelmintic Efficacy Intestinal worms Sheep |
description |
This study evaluated the efficacy of commercially available anthelmintic drugs by calculating the percent reduction of eggs per gram (EPGR%) and appropriate statistical tests. A total of 350 animals selected from five commercial sheep farms was divided in seven groups with 10 animals each: Group 1 - control, Group 2 - Albendazole (5 mg/kg); Group 3 - Levamisole hydrochloride (5 mg/kg); Group 4 - Ivermectin (0.2 mg/kg); Group 5 - Moxidectin (0.2 mg/kg); and Group 6 - Closantel (10 mg/kg); Group 7 - Ivermectin + Levamisole + Albendazole (200 mcg/kg Ivermectin, 7.5 mg/kg Levamisole and 5 mg/kg Albendazole). EPG percent reduction was determined between day zero and day 10 after treatment had started and compared between groups. It was observed that, practically, almost all the tested drugs had some level of parasitic resistance while Moxidectin was the most effective during treatment. The results show that more sustainable procedures such as pasture rotation system, plant‑based products, certain fungi and earthworms need to be adopted to reduce parasitism and anthelmintic resistance in ovine herds. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-06T17:02:00Z 2019-10-06T17:02:00Z 2019-03-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.10.001 Small Ruminant Research, v. 172, p. 48-50. 0921-4488 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190091 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.10.001 2-s2.0-85061105897 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.10.001 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/190091 |
identifier_str_mv |
Small Ruminant Research, v. 172, p. 48-50. 0921-4488 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.10.001 2-s2.0-85061105897 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Small Ruminant Research |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
48-50 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1810021389950779392 |