Effects evaluation of remaining resin removal (three modes) on enamel surface after bracket debonding
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512011000500021 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/72640 |
Resumo: | Introduction: An appropriate selection of instruments is essential to perform a correct debonding technique, by properly removing orthodontic brackets and the remaining resin. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate three methods of remaining resin removal on enamel surface after bracket debonding, by means of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Methods: Eighteen bovine incisors were selected and divided into three groups (A, B and C) of six teeth each. Before bracket bonding, epoxy resin casts were obtained by impression of the teeth with addition silicon, in order to register baseline enamel characteristics and representing the control group. The methods for remaining resin removal were: Group A - gross and medium granulation Soflex discs; Group B - carbide bur in low-speed; Group C - carbide bur in high-speed. Soflex polishing system fine and ultrafine granulation discs were used for Group A, rubber tips for Groups B and C, and polishing paste for all groups. After polishing, impression of teeth were taken and casts were analyzed by means of SEM. The baseline enamel characteristics (Control Group) were compared to the final aspect of enamel to determine the method that generated less enamel abrasion. Results and Conclusion: The remaining resin removal by carbide bur in low-rotation, and enamel polished with rubber tips followed by polishing paste produced the smaller damage to the enamel. |
id |
UNSP_d3b8894f0a3eab36c0ab22492c42060a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/72640 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effects evaluation of remaining resin removal (three modes) on enamel surface after bracket debondingDental enamel. bracket. debondingIntroduction: An appropriate selection of instruments is essential to perform a correct debonding technique, by properly removing orthodontic brackets and the remaining resin. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate three methods of remaining resin removal on enamel surface after bracket debonding, by means of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Methods: Eighteen bovine incisors were selected and divided into three groups (A, B and C) of six teeth each. Before bracket bonding, epoxy resin casts were obtained by impression of the teeth with addition silicon, in order to register baseline enamel characteristics and representing the control group. The methods for remaining resin removal were: Group A - gross and medium granulation Soflex discs; Group B - carbide bur in low-speed; Group C - carbide bur in high-speed. Soflex polishing system fine and ultrafine granulation discs were used for Group A, rubber tips for Groups B and C, and polishing paste for all groups. After polishing, impression of teeth were taken and casts were analyzed by means of SEM. The baseline enamel characteristics (Control Group) were compared to the final aspect of enamel to determine the method that generated less enamel abrasion. Results and Conclusion: The remaining resin removal by carbide bur in low-rotation, and enamel polished with rubber tips followed by polishing paste produced the smaller damage to the enamel.Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC)Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, UFSCState University of São Paulo (UNESP)UFRJ UFSCUniversity of AarhusState University of São Paulo (UNESP)Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)University of AarhusMacIeski, KarineRocha, RobertoLocks, Arno [UNESP]Ribeiro, Gerson Ulema2014-05-27T11:25:59Z2014-05-27T11:25:59Z2011-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article146-154application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512011000500021Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, v. 16, n. 5, p. 146-154, 2011.2176-9451http://hdl.handle.net/11449/7264010.1590/S2176-94512011000500021S2176-945120110005000212-s2.0-848568962812-s2.0-84856896281.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengDental Press Journal of Orthodontics0,489info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-17T06:09:19Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/72640Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:11:43.088277Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effects evaluation of remaining resin removal (three modes) on enamel surface after bracket debonding |
title |
Effects evaluation of remaining resin removal (three modes) on enamel surface after bracket debonding |
spellingShingle |
Effects evaluation of remaining resin removal (three modes) on enamel surface after bracket debonding MacIeski, Karine Dental enamel. bracket. debonding |
title_short |
Effects evaluation of remaining resin removal (three modes) on enamel surface after bracket debonding |
title_full |
Effects evaluation of remaining resin removal (three modes) on enamel surface after bracket debonding |
title_fullStr |
Effects evaluation of remaining resin removal (three modes) on enamel surface after bracket debonding |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects evaluation of remaining resin removal (three modes) on enamel surface after bracket debonding |
title_sort |
Effects evaluation of remaining resin removal (three modes) on enamel surface after bracket debonding |
author |
MacIeski, Karine |
author_facet |
MacIeski, Karine Rocha, Roberto Locks, Arno [UNESP] Ribeiro, Gerson Ulema |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rocha, Roberto Locks, Arno [UNESP] Ribeiro, Gerson Ulema |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) University of Aarhus |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
MacIeski, Karine Rocha, Roberto Locks, Arno [UNESP] Ribeiro, Gerson Ulema |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental enamel. bracket. debonding |
topic |
Dental enamel. bracket. debonding |
description |
Introduction: An appropriate selection of instruments is essential to perform a correct debonding technique, by properly removing orthodontic brackets and the remaining resin. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate three methods of remaining resin removal on enamel surface after bracket debonding, by means of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Methods: Eighteen bovine incisors were selected and divided into three groups (A, B and C) of six teeth each. Before bracket bonding, epoxy resin casts were obtained by impression of the teeth with addition silicon, in order to register baseline enamel characteristics and representing the control group. The methods for remaining resin removal were: Group A - gross and medium granulation Soflex discs; Group B - carbide bur in low-speed; Group C - carbide bur in high-speed. Soflex polishing system fine and ultrafine granulation discs were used for Group A, rubber tips for Groups B and C, and polishing paste for all groups. After polishing, impression of teeth were taken and casts were analyzed by means of SEM. The baseline enamel characteristics (Control Group) were compared to the final aspect of enamel to determine the method that generated less enamel abrasion. Results and Conclusion: The remaining resin removal by carbide bur in low-rotation, and enamel polished with rubber tips followed by polishing paste produced the smaller damage to the enamel. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-09-01 2014-05-27T11:25:59Z 2014-05-27T11:25:59Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512011000500021 Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, v. 16, n. 5, p. 146-154, 2011. 2176-9451 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/72640 10.1590/S2176-94512011000500021 S2176-94512011000500021 2-s2.0-84856896281 2-s2.0-84856896281.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512011000500021 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/72640 |
identifier_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, v. 16, n. 5, p. 146-154, 2011. 2176-9451 10.1590/S2176-94512011000500021 S2176-94512011000500021 2-s2.0-84856896281 2-s2.0-84856896281.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 0,489 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
146-154 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128477935697920 |