Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ulusoy, Çaöry
Data de Publicação: 2009
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3674
Resumo: OBJECTIVE : The aim of this study was to evaluate (1) the effectiveness of one-step polishers on the surface morphology of enamel using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and compare their effects with conventional systems for residual adhesive removal; and (2) the time spent to remove resin remnants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Metal brackets were bonded to the buccal surface of 80 freshly extracted human premolar teeth and received the same resin-removal methods to evaluate the time spent to remove resin remnants (n=10). The brackets were debonded and residual adhesive was removed using different systems. Fourty-five premolars, including the control group with intact enamel (n=5), were examined by SEM. RESULTS: 30-blade tungsten carbide burs were the least time-consuming procedure. The best system in SEM study was the PoGo micro-polishers followed by Super-Snap Rainbow system. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of polishing systems on residual resin removal was dependent on the characteristics of the instruments in each system.
id USP-17_29b810590df8eaf747034d96581d4786
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/3674
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding Scanning electron microscopyOrthodontic bracket debondingDental polishing OBJECTIVE : The aim of this study was to evaluate (1) the effectiveness of one-step polishers on the surface morphology of enamel using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and compare their effects with conventional systems for residual adhesive removal; and (2) the time spent to remove resin remnants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Metal brackets were bonded to the buccal surface of 80 freshly extracted human premolar teeth and received the same resin-removal methods to evaluate the time spent to remove resin remnants (n=10). The brackets were debonded and residual adhesive was removed using different systems. Fourty-five premolars, including the control group with intact enamel (n=5), were examined by SEM. RESULTS: 30-blade tungsten carbide burs were the least time-consuming procedure. The best system in SEM study was the PoGo micro-polishers followed by Super-Snap Rainbow system. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of polishing systems on residual resin removal was dependent on the characteristics of the instruments in each system. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2009-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/367410.1590/S1678-77572009000300015Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 17 No. 3 (2009); 209-215 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 17 Núm. 3 (2009); 209-215 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 17 n. 3 (2009); 209-215 1678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3674/4364Copyright (c) 2009 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUlusoy, Çaöry2012-04-27T12:04:59Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/3674Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2012-04-27T12:04:59Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding
title Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding
spellingShingle Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding
Ulusoy, Çaöry
Scanning electron microscopy
Orthodontic bracket debonding
Dental polishing
title_short Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding
title_full Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding
title_fullStr Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding
title_sort Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding
author Ulusoy, Çaöry
author_facet Ulusoy, Çaöry
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ulusoy, Çaöry
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Scanning electron microscopy
Orthodontic bracket debonding
Dental polishing
topic Scanning electron microscopy
Orthodontic bracket debonding
Dental polishing
description OBJECTIVE : The aim of this study was to evaluate (1) the effectiveness of one-step polishers on the surface morphology of enamel using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and compare their effects with conventional systems for residual adhesive removal; and (2) the time spent to remove resin remnants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Metal brackets were bonded to the buccal surface of 80 freshly extracted human premolar teeth and received the same resin-removal methods to evaluate the time spent to remove resin remnants (n=10). The brackets were debonded and residual adhesive was removed using different systems. Fourty-five premolars, including the control group with intact enamel (n=5), were examined by SEM. RESULTS: 30-blade tungsten carbide burs were the least time-consuming procedure. The best system in SEM study was the PoGo micro-polishers followed by Super-Snap Rainbow system. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of polishing systems on residual resin removal was dependent on the characteristics of the instruments in each system.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3674
10.1590/S1678-77572009000300015
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3674
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-77572009000300015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3674/4364
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2009 Journal of Applied Oral Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2009 Journal of Applied Oral Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 17 No. 3 (2009); 209-215
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 17 Núm. 3 (2009); 209-215
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 17 n. 3 (2009); 209-215
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1800221674737500160

Registros relacionados