Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p619 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208464 |
Resumo: | Figs consumption date back to the beginnings of civilization. Currently, consumers have become more demanding about quality of fruits, and figs are then highly indicated, since it is rich in nutrients, making them a great addition to a healthy diet. Although there is only one commercial fig cultivar that is commonly grown in Brazil, different cultivars should be considered for the diversification of fig production with regards to their yield and fruit quality. This research aimed at evaluating growth, yield, physicochemical characteristics and bioactive compounds of figs grown in Brazil. Then, four cultivars (Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova, PI-189 and Troyano) were studied to determine canopy volume, productive efficiency, soluble solids - SS, pH, titratable acidity - TA, SS/TA ratio, sugars, ascorbic acid, phenolic compounds, pigments and antioxidant activity. The cv. White Genova presented the highest canopy volume, while 'Roxo de Valinhos', 'PI-189' and 'Troyano' performed the greatest productive efficiency. The cvs. Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova and Troyano produced fruits with higher content of SS, reducing sugars and SS/TA ratio, while the fruits of 'PI-189' and 'Roxo de Valinhos' contained the highest levels of antioxidant activity. PCA enabled to differentiate the studied cultivars, which evidenced that PI-189 was the most different of all. |
id |
UNSP_d57de2643a2b50100d580483d96b9b81 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/208464 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in BrazilDiferenças agronômicas e qualidade de quatro cultivares de figo cultivados no BrasilAntioxidantsFicus carica LPhenolic compoundsTree performanceYieldFigs consumption date back to the beginnings of civilization. Currently, consumers have become more demanding about quality of fruits, and figs are then highly indicated, since it is rich in nutrients, making them a great addition to a healthy diet. Although there is only one commercial fig cultivar that is commonly grown in Brazil, different cultivars should be considered for the diversification of fig production with regards to their yield and fruit quality. This research aimed at evaluating growth, yield, physicochemical characteristics and bioactive compounds of figs grown in Brazil. Then, four cultivars (Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova, PI-189 and Troyano) were studied to determine canopy volume, productive efficiency, soluble solids - SS, pH, titratable acidity - TA, SS/TA ratio, sugars, ascorbic acid, phenolic compounds, pigments and antioxidant activity. The cv. White Genova presented the highest canopy volume, while 'Roxo de Valinhos', 'PI-189' and 'Troyano' performed the greatest productive efficiency. The cvs. Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova and Troyano produced fruits with higher content of SS, reducing sugars and SS/TA ratio, while the fruits of 'PI-189' and 'Roxo de Valinhos' contained the highest levels of antioxidant activity. PCA enabled to differentiate the studied cultivars, which evidenced that PI-189 was the most different of all.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Amazonas Federal Institute IFAMSchool of Agriculture São Paulo State University UNESP FCAGraduate Students of The Agronomy/Horticulture Graduate Program UNESP FCASchool of Agriculture São Paulo State University UNESP FCAGraduate Students of The Agronomy/Horticulture Graduate Program UNESP FCACNPq: 304455/2017-2IFAMUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Ferraz, Rafael AugustoLeonel, Sarita [UNESP]Souza, Jackson Mirellys Azevêdo [UNESP]Modesto, Joyce Helena [UNESP]Ferreira, Rafael Bibiano [UNESP]de Souza Silva, Marcelo [UNESP]2021-06-25T11:12:32Z2021-06-25T11:12:32Z2021-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article619-634http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p619Semina:Ciencias Agrarias, v. 42, n. 2, p. 619-634, 2021.1679-03591676-546Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/20846410.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p6192-s2.0-85101802128Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengSemina:Ciencias Agrariasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T14:33:56Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/208464Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:44:29.747569Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil Diferenças agronômicas e qualidade de quatro cultivares de figo cultivados no Brasil |
title |
Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil Ferraz, Rafael Augusto Antioxidants Ficus carica L Phenolic compounds Tree performance Yield |
title_short |
Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil |
title_full |
Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil |
title_sort |
Agronomical and quality differences of four fig cultivars grown in Brazil |
author |
Ferraz, Rafael Augusto |
author_facet |
Ferraz, Rafael Augusto Leonel, Sarita [UNESP] Souza, Jackson Mirellys Azevêdo [UNESP] Modesto, Joyce Helena [UNESP] Ferreira, Rafael Bibiano [UNESP] de Souza Silva, Marcelo [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Leonel, Sarita [UNESP] Souza, Jackson Mirellys Azevêdo [UNESP] Modesto, Joyce Helena [UNESP] Ferreira, Rafael Bibiano [UNESP] de Souza Silva, Marcelo [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
IFAM Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferraz, Rafael Augusto Leonel, Sarita [UNESP] Souza, Jackson Mirellys Azevêdo [UNESP] Modesto, Joyce Helena [UNESP] Ferreira, Rafael Bibiano [UNESP] de Souza Silva, Marcelo [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Antioxidants Ficus carica L Phenolic compounds Tree performance Yield |
topic |
Antioxidants Ficus carica L Phenolic compounds Tree performance Yield |
description |
Figs consumption date back to the beginnings of civilization. Currently, consumers have become more demanding about quality of fruits, and figs are then highly indicated, since it is rich in nutrients, making them a great addition to a healthy diet. Although there is only one commercial fig cultivar that is commonly grown in Brazil, different cultivars should be considered for the diversification of fig production with regards to their yield and fruit quality. This research aimed at evaluating growth, yield, physicochemical characteristics and bioactive compounds of figs grown in Brazil. Then, four cultivars (Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova, PI-189 and Troyano) were studied to determine canopy volume, productive efficiency, soluble solids - SS, pH, titratable acidity - TA, SS/TA ratio, sugars, ascorbic acid, phenolic compounds, pigments and antioxidant activity. The cv. White Genova presented the highest canopy volume, while 'Roxo de Valinhos', 'PI-189' and 'Troyano' performed the greatest productive efficiency. The cvs. Roxo de Valinhos, White Genova and Troyano produced fruits with higher content of SS, reducing sugars and SS/TA ratio, while the fruits of 'PI-189' and 'Roxo de Valinhos' contained the highest levels of antioxidant activity. PCA enabled to differentiate the studied cultivars, which evidenced that PI-189 was the most different of all. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-25T11:12:32Z 2021-06-25T11:12:32Z 2021-02-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p619 Semina:Ciencias Agrarias, v. 42, n. 2, p. 619-634, 2021. 1679-0359 1676-546X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208464 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p619 2-s2.0-85101802128 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p619 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208464 |
identifier_str_mv |
Semina:Ciencias Agrarias, v. 42, n. 2, p. 619-634, 2021. 1679-0359 1676-546X 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p619 2-s2.0-85101802128 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina:Ciencias Agrarias |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
619-634 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129111705518080 |