Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: De Oliveira, Cristiane Aparecida [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Spolidório, Luís Carlos [UNESP], Cirelli, Joni Augusto [UNESP], Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chiérici [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/224641
Resumo: Gingival recession was created in six mongrel dogs. The dogs were divided into two groups based on treatment: group 1 - AlloDerm only, group 2 - AlloDerm + Emdogain. The histologic results were compared. At the end of the study, the mean values were, for groups 1 and 2, respectively: 0.06 and 0.32 mm for cementum regeneration; -0.75 and -0.86 mm for bone regeneration; -2.75 and -3.11 mm for attachment level; and 4.90 and 5.51 mm for defect extent. The epithelial formation parameter was 2.88 mm in group 1 and 2.15 mm in group 2, which was a statistically significant difference. It could be concluded that Emdogain did not result in beneficial effects when associated with AlloDerm.
id UNSP_e64e2667ac50820ad23de94f96b4564e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/224641
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogsGingival recession was created in six mongrel dogs. The dogs were divided into two groups based on treatment: group 1 - AlloDerm only, group 2 - AlloDerm + Emdogain. The histologic results were compared. At the end of the study, the mean values were, for groups 1 and 2, respectively: 0.06 and 0.32 mm for cementum regeneration; -0.75 and -0.86 mm for bone regeneration; -2.75 and -3.11 mm for attachment level; and 4.90 and 5.51 mm for defect extent. The epithelial formation parameter was 2.88 mm in group 1 and 2.15 mm in group 2, which was a statistically significant difference. It could be concluded that Emdogain did not result in beneficial effects when associated with AlloDerm.Department of Periodontology School of Dentistry at Araraquara UNESP Araraquara, SPDepartment of Pathology and Physiology School of Dentistry at Araraquara UNESP Araraquara, SPDisciplina de Periodontia Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara UNESP, Rua Humaitá, 1680, Centro, Araraquara/SP, CEP 14801-903Department of Periodontology School of Dentistry at Araraquara UNESP Araraquara, SPDepartment of Pathology and Physiology School of Dentistry at Araraquara UNESP Araraquara, SPDisciplina de Periodontia Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara UNESP, Rua Humaitá, 1680, Centro, Araraquara/SP, CEP 14801-903Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)De Oliveira, Cristiane Aparecida [UNESP]Spolidório, Luís Carlos [UNESP]Cirelli, Joni Augusto [UNESP]Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chiérici [UNESP]2022-04-28T20:04:24Z2022-04-28T20:04:24Z2005-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article595-603International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, v. 25, n. 6, p. 595-603, 2005.0198-7569http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2246412-s2.0-27944506009Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T20:04:24Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/224641Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:46:34.189690Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogs
title Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogs
spellingShingle Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogs
De Oliveira, Cristiane Aparecida [UNESP]
title_short Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogs
title_full Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogs
title_fullStr Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogs
title_full_unstemmed Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogs
title_sort Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogs
author De Oliveira, Cristiane Aparecida [UNESP]
author_facet De Oliveira, Cristiane Aparecida [UNESP]
Spolidório, Luís Carlos [UNESP]
Cirelli, Joni Augusto [UNESP]
Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chiérici [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Spolidório, Luís Carlos [UNESP]
Cirelli, Joni Augusto [UNESP]
Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chiérici [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv De Oliveira, Cristiane Aparecida [UNESP]
Spolidório, Luís Carlos [UNESP]
Cirelli, Joni Augusto [UNESP]
Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chiérici [UNESP]
description Gingival recession was created in six mongrel dogs. The dogs were divided into two groups based on treatment: group 1 - AlloDerm only, group 2 - AlloDerm + Emdogain. The histologic results were compared. At the end of the study, the mean values were, for groups 1 and 2, respectively: 0.06 and 0.32 mm for cementum regeneration; -0.75 and -0.86 mm for bone regeneration; -2.75 and -3.11 mm for attachment level; and 4.90 and 5.51 mm for defect extent. The epithelial formation parameter was 2.88 mm in group 1 and 2.15 mm in group 2, which was a statistically significant difference. It could be concluded that Emdogain did not result in beneficial effects when associated with AlloDerm.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-12-01
2022-04-28T20:04:24Z
2022-04-28T20:04:24Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, v. 25, n. 6, p. 595-603, 2005.
0198-7569
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/224641
2-s2.0-27944506009
identifier_str_mv International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, v. 25, n. 6, p. 595-603, 2005.
0198-7569
2-s2.0-27944506009
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/224641
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 595-603
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128855238508544