Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogs
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/224641 |
Resumo: | Gingival recession was created in six mongrel dogs. The dogs were divided into two groups based on treatment: group 1 - AlloDerm only, group 2 - AlloDerm + Emdogain. The histologic results were compared. At the end of the study, the mean values were, for groups 1 and 2, respectively: 0.06 and 0.32 mm for cementum regeneration; -0.75 and -0.86 mm for bone regeneration; -2.75 and -3.11 mm for attachment level; and 4.90 and 5.51 mm for defect extent. The epithelial formation parameter was 2.88 mm in group 1 and 2.15 mm in group 2, which was a statistically significant difference. It could be concluded that Emdogain did not result in beneficial effects when associated with AlloDerm. |
id |
UNSP_e64e2667ac50820ad23de94f96b4564e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/224641 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogsGingival recession was created in six mongrel dogs. The dogs were divided into two groups based on treatment: group 1 - AlloDerm only, group 2 - AlloDerm + Emdogain. The histologic results were compared. At the end of the study, the mean values were, for groups 1 and 2, respectively: 0.06 and 0.32 mm for cementum regeneration; -0.75 and -0.86 mm for bone regeneration; -2.75 and -3.11 mm for attachment level; and 4.90 and 5.51 mm for defect extent. The epithelial formation parameter was 2.88 mm in group 1 and 2.15 mm in group 2, which was a statistically significant difference. It could be concluded that Emdogain did not result in beneficial effects when associated with AlloDerm.Department of Periodontology School of Dentistry at Araraquara UNESP Araraquara, SPDepartment of Pathology and Physiology School of Dentistry at Araraquara UNESP Araraquara, SPDisciplina de Periodontia Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara UNESP, Rua Humaitá, 1680, Centro, Araraquara/SP, CEP 14801-903Department of Periodontology School of Dentistry at Araraquara UNESP Araraquara, SPDepartment of Pathology and Physiology School of Dentistry at Araraquara UNESP Araraquara, SPDisciplina de Periodontia Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara UNESP, Rua Humaitá, 1680, Centro, Araraquara/SP, CEP 14801-903Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)De Oliveira, Cristiane Aparecida [UNESP]Spolidório, Luís Carlos [UNESP]Cirelli, Joni Augusto [UNESP]Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chiérici [UNESP]2022-04-28T20:04:24Z2022-04-28T20:04:24Z2005-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article595-603International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, v. 25, n. 6, p. 595-603, 2005.0198-7569http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2246412-s2.0-27944506009Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-27T14:05:06Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/224641Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-27T14:05:06Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogs |
title |
Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogs |
spellingShingle |
Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogs De Oliveira, Cristiane Aparecida [UNESP] |
title_short |
Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogs |
title_full |
Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogs |
title_fullStr |
Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogs |
title_sort |
Acellular dermal matrix allograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix protein in gingival recession: Histologic study in dogs |
author |
De Oliveira, Cristiane Aparecida [UNESP] |
author_facet |
De Oliveira, Cristiane Aparecida [UNESP] Spolidório, Luís Carlos [UNESP] Cirelli, Joni Augusto [UNESP] Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chiérici [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Spolidório, Luís Carlos [UNESP] Cirelli, Joni Augusto [UNESP] Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chiérici [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
De Oliveira, Cristiane Aparecida [UNESP] Spolidório, Luís Carlos [UNESP] Cirelli, Joni Augusto [UNESP] Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chiérici [UNESP] |
description |
Gingival recession was created in six mongrel dogs. The dogs were divided into two groups based on treatment: group 1 - AlloDerm only, group 2 - AlloDerm + Emdogain. The histologic results were compared. At the end of the study, the mean values were, for groups 1 and 2, respectively: 0.06 and 0.32 mm for cementum regeneration; -0.75 and -0.86 mm for bone regeneration; -2.75 and -3.11 mm for attachment level; and 4.90 and 5.51 mm for defect extent. The epithelial formation parameter was 2.88 mm in group 1 and 2.15 mm in group 2, which was a statistically significant difference. It could be concluded that Emdogain did not result in beneficial effects when associated with AlloDerm. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-12-01 2022-04-28T20:04:24Z 2022-04-28T20:04:24Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, v. 25, n. 6, p. 595-603, 2005. 0198-7569 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/224641 2-s2.0-27944506009 |
identifier_str_mv |
International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, v. 25, n. 6, p. 595-603, 2005. 0198-7569 2-s2.0-27944506009 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/224641 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
595-603 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546437958434816 |