Limestone increased coffee yield and profitability more than phosphogypsum or their combination
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20712 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208775 |
Resumo: | Soil acidity and low concentrations of exchangeable Ca and Mg are among the main factors that limit the Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.) yield in Brazil. Constant fertilizations, especially with ammonium-based N, contribute to acidification in the soil region where they are applied. Coffee producers wonder if limestone and phosphogypsum, isolated or combined, can increase coffee yields. A field experiment was conducted from 2015 to 2020 in southeastern Brazil to evaluate the effect of sole application of limestone and phosphogypsum, or their combined application to young coffee trees (2-yr old), on plant nutrition, yield, and profitability of Arabica coffee crop. Treatments included three limestone rates (0, 2,100, and 4,200 kg ha−1), two phosphogypsum rates (0 and 2,300 kg ha−1), and their combinations, which were band applied under coffee plant canopy. Limestone, in association with phophogypsum or when sole-applied, increased the pH and the concentration of Ca and Mg in the soil, whereas the application of phosphogypsum increased Ca and SO4–S concentration. Coffee yields were increased by the sole application of limestone and phosphogypsum (to a lesser extent), but not when they were combined. The most successful treatment was the sole application of limestone, with increases of up to 44% (613 kg ha−1 yr−1 on average) in yield and 43% in economic returns. |
id |
UNSP_e9ba9a743380e0a49e4c63cfd2e84d06 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/208775 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Limestone increased coffee yield and profitability more than phosphogypsum or their combinationSoil acidity and low concentrations of exchangeable Ca and Mg are among the main factors that limit the Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.) yield in Brazil. Constant fertilizations, especially with ammonium-based N, contribute to acidification in the soil region where they are applied. Coffee producers wonder if limestone and phosphogypsum, isolated or combined, can increase coffee yields. A field experiment was conducted from 2015 to 2020 in southeastern Brazil to evaluate the effect of sole application of limestone and phosphogypsum, or their combined application to young coffee trees (2-yr old), on plant nutrition, yield, and profitability of Arabica coffee crop. Treatments included three limestone rates (0, 2,100, and 4,200 kg ha−1), two phosphogypsum rates (0 and 2,300 kg ha−1), and their combinations, which were band applied under coffee plant canopy. Limestone, in association with phophogypsum or when sole-applied, increased the pH and the concentration of Ca and Mg in the soil, whereas the application of phosphogypsum increased Ca and SO4–S concentration. Coffee yields were increased by the sole application of limestone and phosphogypsum (to a lesser extent), but not when they were combined. The most successful treatment was the sole application of limestone, with increases of up to 44% (613 kg ha−1 yr−1 on average) in yield and 43% in economic returns.Dep. of Crop Science College of Agricultural Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)São Paulo Agency of Agrobusiness Technology (APTA/SAA) Midwest Regional/SAACompass Minerals América do Sul Indústria e Comércio SADep. of Agricultural Sciences and Technology School of Agriculture and Enterprise Development Kenyatta UniversityDep. of Crop Science College of Agricultural Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Midwest Regional/SAACompass Minerals América do Sul Indústria e Comércio SAKenyatta UniversityParecido, Renan J. [UNESP]Soratto, Rogério P. [UNESP]Perdoná, Marcos J.Guidorizzi, Fernando V. C. [UNESP]Gomes, Guilherme G. [UNESP]Paula, Rodrigo A. [UNESP]Gitari, Harun I.2021-06-25T11:18:45Z2021-06-25T11:18:45Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20712Agronomy Journal.1435-06450002-1962http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20877510.1002/agj2.207122-s2.0-85107899729Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAgronomy Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T15:56:41Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/208775Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:08:36.639850Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Limestone increased coffee yield and profitability more than phosphogypsum or their combination |
title |
Limestone increased coffee yield and profitability more than phosphogypsum or their combination |
spellingShingle |
Limestone increased coffee yield and profitability more than phosphogypsum or their combination Parecido, Renan J. [UNESP] |
title_short |
Limestone increased coffee yield and profitability more than phosphogypsum or their combination |
title_full |
Limestone increased coffee yield and profitability more than phosphogypsum or their combination |
title_fullStr |
Limestone increased coffee yield and profitability more than phosphogypsum or their combination |
title_full_unstemmed |
Limestone increased coffee yield and profitability more than phosphogypsum or their combination |
title_sort |
Limestone increased coffee yield and profitability more than phosphogypsum or their combination |
author |
Parecido, Renan J. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Parecido, Renan J. [UNESP] Soratto, Rogério P. [UNESP] Perdoná, Marcos J. Guidorizzi, Fernando V. C. [UNESP] Gomes, Guilherme G. [UNESP] Paula, Rodrigo A. [UNESP] Gitari, Harun I. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Soratto, Rogério P. [UNESP] Perdoná, Marcos J. Guidorizzi, Fernando V. C. [UNESP] Gomes, Guilherme G. [UNESP] Paula, Rodrigo A. [UNESP] Gitari, Harun I. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Midwest Regional/SAA Compass Minerals América do Sul Indústria e Comércio SA Kenyatta University |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Parecido, Renan J. [UNESP] Soratto, Rogério P. [UNESP] Perdoná, Marcos J. Guidorizzi, Fernando V. C. [UNESP] Gomes, Guilherme G. [UNESP] Paula, Rodrigo A. [UNESP] Gitari, Harun I. |
description |
Soil acidity and low concentrations of exchangeable Ca and Mg are among the main factors that limit the Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.) yield in Brazil. Constant fertilizations, especially with ammonium-based N, contribute to acidification in the soil region where they are applied. Coffee producers wonder if limestone and phosphogypsum, isolated or combined, can increase coffee yields. A field experiment was conducted from 2015 to 2020 in southeastern Brazil to evaluate the effect of sole application of limestone and phosphogypsum, or their combined application to young coffee trees (2-yr old), on plant nutrition, yield, and profitability of Arabica coffee crop. Treatments included three limestone rates (0, 2,100, and 4,200 kg ha−1), two phosphogypsum rates (0 and 2,300 kg ha−1), and their combinations, which were band applied under coffee plant canopy. Limestone, in association with phophogypsum or when sole-applied, increased the pH and the concentration of Ca and Mg in the soil, whereas the application of phosphogypsum increased Ca and SO4–S concentration. Coffee yields were increased by the sole application of limestone and phosphogypsum (to a lesser extent), but not when they were combined. The most successful treatment was the sole application of limestone, with increases of up to 44% (613 kg ha−1 yr−1 on average) in yield and 43% in economic returns. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-25T11:18:45Z 2021-06-25T11:18:45Z 2021-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20712 Agronomy Journal. 1435-0645 0002-1962 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208775 10.1002/agj2.20712 2-s2.0-85107899729 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20712 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208775 |
identifier_str_mv |
Agronomy Journal. 1435-0645 0002-1962 10.1002/agj2.20712 2-s2.0-85107899729 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Agronomy Journal |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128901664210944 |