Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationships

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andrade Caldeira, Ana Maria de [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Siebert, Paloma Rodrigues, Correa, Andre Luis, Meglhioratti, Fernanda Aparecida, Brando, Fernanda da Rocha, Maricato, Fulvia Eloa, Della Justina, Lourdes Aparecida, Bologna Soares de Andrade, Mariana Aparecida, Oliveira, Thais Benetti de [UNESP], Silva Augusto, Thais Gimenez da [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.gdla.2016.v11n1.a9
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/159365
Resumo: This paper describes the developing and validating steps of a Likert's evaluative scale. The aim is to systematize the answers of Biological Sciences students about to: 1) Understanding or not understanding the scientific knowledge; and 2) If there is a relationship among scientific concepts in order to contemplate a systemic thinking about natural phenomena. The described scale was validated by Cronbach's Alpha tests (alpha = 0.741), KMO (0.779) and Bartlett (0.000) and a Multivariate Analysis was fulfilled, type Principal Component Analysis (PCA). We understood this kind of instrument allows a large amount of data to be collected and it groups can be compared efficiently, which justified the development of evaluative scale presented here.
id UNSP_f0cbbeb076acc550add87d0a82097f99
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/159365
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationshipsbiology educationevaluative scalelikertsystemic knowledgefragmented knowledgeThis paper describes the developing and validating steps of a Likert's evaluative scale. The aim is to systematize the answers of Biological Sciences students about to: 1) Understanding or not understanding the scientific knowledge; and 2) If there is a relationship among scientific concepts in order to contemplate a systemic thinking about natural phenomena. The described scale was validated by Cronbach's Alpha tests (alpha = 0.741), KMO (0.779) and Bartlett (0.000) and a Multivariate Analysis was fulfilled, type Principal Component Analysis (PCA). We understood this kind of instrument allows a large amount of data to be collected and it groups can be compared efficiently, which justified the development of evaluative scale presented here.Univ Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Bauru, SP, BrazilInst Fed Educ Ciencia & Tecnol Para IFPA, Santarem, PA, BrazilVisitante Univ Estadual Santa Cruz UESC, Ilheus, BA, BrazilUniv Estadual Oeste Parana UNIOESTE, Cascavel, PR, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Maringa, Maringa, PR, BrazilUniv Estadual Londrina, Londrina, PR, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Bauru, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Francisco Jose Caldas, Fac Science & EducationUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Inst Fed Educ Ciencia & Tecnol Para IFPAVisitante Univ Estadual Santa Cruz UESCUniv Estadual Oeste Parana UNIOESTEUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)Andrade Caldeira, Ana Maria de [UNESP]Siebert, Paloma RodriguesCorrea, Andre LuisMeglhioratti, Fernanda AparecidaBrando, Fernanda da RochaMaricato, Fulvia EloaDella Justina, Lourdes AparecidaBologna Soares de Andrade, Mariana AparecidaOliveira, Thais Benetti de [UNESP]Silva Augusto, Thais Gimenez da [UNESP]2018-11-26T15:38:37Z2018-11-26T15:38:37Z2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article128-146application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.gdla.2016.v11n1.a9Gondola-ensenanza Y Aprendizaje De Las Ciencias. Bogota: Univ Francisco Jose Caldas, Fac Science & Education, v. 11, n. 1, p. 128-146, 2016.2346-4712http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15936510.14483/udistrital.jour.gdla.2016.v11n1.a9WOS:000393451200011WOS000393451200011.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPspaGondola-ensenanza Y Aprendizaje De Las Cienciasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-12T06:04:19Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/159365Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-10-12T06:04:19Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationships
title Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationships
spellingShingle Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationships
Andrade Caldeira, Ana Maria de [UNESP]
biology education
evaluative scale
likert
systemic knowledge
fragmented knowledge
title_short Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationships
title_full Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationships
title_fullStr Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationships
title_full_unstemmed Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationships
title_sort Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationships
author Andrade Caldeira, Ana Maria de [UNESP]
author_facet Andrade Caldeira, Ana Maria de [UNESP]
Siebert, Paloma Rodrigues
Correa, Andre Luis
Meglhioratti, Fernanda Aparecida
Brando, Fernanda da Rocha
Maricato, Fulvia Eloa
Della Justina, Lourdes Aparecida
Bologna Soares de Andrade, Mariana Aparecida
Oliveira, Thais Benetti de [UNESP]
Silva Augusto, Thais Gimenez da [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Siebert, Paloma Rodrigues
Correa, Andre Luis
Meglhioratti, Fernanda Aparecida
Brando, Fernanda da Rocha
Maricato, Fulvia Eloa
Della Justina, Lourdes Aparecida
Bologna Soares de Andrade, Mariana Aparecida
Oliveira, Thais Benetti de [UNESP]
Silva Augusto, Thais Gimenez da [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Inst Fed Educ Ciencia & Tecnol Para IFPA
Visitante Univ Estadual Santa Cruz UESC
Univ Estadual Oeste Parana UNIOESTE
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andrade Caldeira, Ana Maria de [UNESP]
Siebert, Paloma Rodrigues
Correa, Andre Luis
Meglhioratti, Fernanda Aparecida
Brando, Fernanda da Rocha
Maricato, Fulvia Eloa
Della Justina, Lourdes Aparecida
Bologna Soares de Andrade, Mariana Aparecida
Oliveira, Thais Benetti de [UNESP]
Silva Augusto, Thais Gimenez da [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv biology education
evaluative scale
likert
systemic knowledge
fragmented knowledge
topic biology education
evaluative scale
likert
systemic knowledge
fragmented knowledge
description This paper describes the developing and validating steps of a Likert's evaluative scale. The aim is to systematize the answers of Biological Sciences students about to: 1) Understanding or not understanding the scientific knowledge; and 2) If there is a relationship among scientific concepts in order to contemplate a systemic thinking about natural phenomena. The described scale was validated by Cronbach's Alpha tests (alpha = 0.741), KMO (0.779) and Bartlett (0.000) and a Multivariate Analysis was fulfilled, type Principal Component Analysis (PCA). We understood this kind of instrument allows a large amount of data to be collected and it groups can be compared efficiently, which justified the development of evaluative scale presented here.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-01
2018-11-26T15:38:37Z
2018-11-26T15:38:37Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.gdla.2016.v11n1.a9
Gondola-ensenanza Y Aprendizaje De Las Ciencias. Bogota: Univ Francisco Jose Caldas, Fac Science & Education, v. 11, n. 1, p. 128-146, 2016.
2346-4712
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/159365
10.14483/udistrital.jour.gdla.2016.v11n1.a9
WOS:000393451200011
WOS000393451200011.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.gdla.2016.v11n1.a9
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/159365
identifier_str_mv Gondola-ensenanza Y Aprendizaje De Las Ciencias. Bogota: Univ Francisco Jose Caldas, Fac Science & Education, v. 11, n. 1, p. 128-146, 2016.
2346-4712
10.14483/udistrital.jour.gdla.2016.v11n1.a9
WOS:000393451200011
WOS000393451200011.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Gondola-ensenanza Y Aprendizaje De Las Ciencias
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 128-146
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Francisco Jose Caldas, Fac Science & Education
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Francisco Jose Caldas, Fac Science & Education
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803045950884675584