Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationships
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.gdla.2016.v11n1.a9 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/159365 |
Resumo: | This paper describes the developing and validating steps of a Likert's evaluative scale. The aim is to systematize the answers of Biological Sciences students about to: 1) Understanding or not understanding the scientific knowledge; and 2) If there is a relationship among scientific concepts in order to contemplate a systemic thinking about natural phenomena. The described scale was validated by Cronbach's Alpha tests (alpha = 0.741), KMO (0.779) and Bartlett (0.000) and a Multivariate Analysis was fulfilled, type Principal Component Analysis (PCA). We understood this kind of instrument allows a large amount of data to be collected and it groups can be compared efficiently, which justified the development of evaluative scale presented here. |
id |
UNSP_f0cbbeb076acc550add87d0a82097f99 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/159365 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationshipsbiology educationevaluative scalelikertsystemic knowledgefragmented knowledgeThis paper describes the developing and validating steps of a Likert's evaluative scale. The aim is to systematize the answers of Biological Sciences students about to: 1) Understanding or not understanding the scientific knowledge; and 2) If there is a relationship among scientific concepts in order to contemplate a systemic thinking about natural phenomena. The described scale was validated by Cronbach's Alpha tests (alpha = 0.741), KMO (0.779) and Bartlett (0.000) and a Multivariate Analysis was fulfilled, type Principal Component Analysis (PCA). We understood this kind of instrument allows a large amount of data to be collected and it groups can be compared efficiently, which justified the development of evaluative scale presented here.Univ Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Bauru, SP, BrazilInst Fed Educ Ciencia & Tecnol Para IFPA, Santarem, PA, BrazilVisitante Univ Estadual Santa Cruz UESC, Ilheus, BA, BrazilUniv Estadual Oeste Parana UNIOESTE, Cascavel, PR, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Maringa, Maringa, PR, BrazilUniv Estadual Londrina, Londrina, PR, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Bauru, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Francisco Jose Caldas, Fac Science & EducationUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Inst Fed Educ Ciencia & Tecnol Para IFPAVisitante Univ Estadual Santa Cruz UESCUniv Estadual Oeste Parana UNIOESTEUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)Andrade Caldeira, Ana Maria de [UNESP]Siebert, Paloma RodriguesCorrea, Andre LuisMeglhioratti, Fernanda AparecidaBrando, Fernanda da RochaMaricato, Fulvia EloaDella Justina, Lourdes AparecidaBologna Soares de Andrade, Mariana AparecidaOliveira, Thais Benetti de [UNESP]Silva Augusto, Thais Gimenez da [UNESP]2018-11-26T15:38:37Z2018-11-26T15:38:37Z2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article128-146application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.gdla.2016.v11n1.a9Gondola-ensenanza Y Aprendizaje De Las Ciencias. Bogota: Univ Francisco Jose Caldas, Fac Science & Education, v. 11, n. 1, p. 128-146, 2016.2346-4712http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15936510.14483/udistrital.jour.gdla.2016.v11n1.a9WOS:000393451200011WOS000393451200011.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPspaGondola-ensenanza Y Aprendizaje De Las Cienciasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-12T06:04:19Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/159365Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:40:53.640436Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationships |
title |
Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationships |
spellingShingle |
Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationships Andrade Caldeira, Ana Maria de [UNESP] biology education evaluative scale likert systemic knowledge fragmented knowledge |
title_short |
Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationships |
title_full |
Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationships |
title_fullStr |
Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationships |
title_full_unstemmed |
Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationships |
title_sort |
Proposition of diagnostic tool to provide indicatives about the understanding of biological knowledge and their interrelationships |
author |
Andrade Caldeira, Ana Maria de [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Andrade Caldeira, Ana Maria de [UNESP] Siebert, Paloma Rodrigues Correa, Andre Luis Meglhioratti, Fernanda Aparecida Brando, Fernanda da Rocha Maricato, Fulvia Eloa Della Justina, Lourdes Aparecida Bologna Soares de Andrade, Mariana Aparecida Oliveira, Thais Benetti de [UNESP] Silva Augusto, Thais Gimenez da [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Siebert, Paloma Rodrigues Correa, Andre Luis Meglhioratti, Fernanda Aparecida Brando, Fernanda da Rocha Maricato, Fulvia Eloa Della Justina, Lourdes Aparecida Bologna Soares de Andrade, Mariana Aparecida Oliveira, Thais Benetti de [UNESP] Silva Augusto, Thais Gimenez da [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Inst Fed Educ Ciencia & Tecnol Para IFPA Visitante Univ Estadual Santa Cruz UESC Univ Estadual Oeste Parana UNIOESTE Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Andrade Caldeira, Ana Maria de [UNESP] Siebert, Paloma Rodrigues Correa, Andre Luis Meglhioratti, Fernanda Aparecida Brando, Fernanda da Rocha Maricato, Fulvia Eloa Della Justina, Lourdes Aparecida Bologna Soares de Andrade, Mariana Aparecida Oliveira, Thais Benetti de [UNESP] Silva Augusto, Thais Gimenez da [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
biology education evaluative scale likert systemic knowledge fragmented knowledge |
topic |
biology education evaluative scale likert systemic knowledge fragmented knowledge |
description |
This paper describes the developing and validating steps of a Likert's evaluative scale. The aim is to systematize the answers of Biological Sciences students about to: 1) Understanding or not understanding the scientific knowledge; and 2) If there is a relationship among scientific concepts in order to contemplate a systemic thinking about natural phenomena. The described scale was validated by Cronbach's Alpha tests (alpha = 0.741), KMO (0.779) and Bartlett (0.000) and a Multivariate Analysis was fulfilled, type Principal Component Analysis (PCA). We understood this kind of instrument allows a large amount of data to be collected and it groups can be compared efficiently, which justified the development of evaluative scale presented here. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-01 2018-11-26T15:38:37Z 2018-11-26T15:38:37Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.gdla.2016.v11n1.a9 Gondola-ensenanza Y Aprendizaje De Las Ciencias. Bogota: Univ Francisco Jose Caldas, Fac Science & Education, v. 11, n. 1, p. 128-146, 2016. 2346-4712 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/159365 10.14483/udistrital.jour.gdla.2016.v11n1.a9 WOS:000393451200011 WOS000393451200011.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.gdla.2016.v11n1.a9 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/159365 |
identifier_str_mv |
Gondola-ensenanza Y Aprendizaje De Las Ciencias. Bogota: Univ Francisco Jose Caldas, Fac Science & Education, v. 11, n. 1, p. 128-146, 2016. 2346-4712 10.14483/udistrital.jour.gdla.2016.v11n1.a9 WOS:000393451200011 WOS000393451200011.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Gondola-ensenanza Y Aprendizaje De Las Ciencias |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
128-146 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Francisco Jose Caldas, Fac Science & Education |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Francisco Jose Caldas, Fac Science & Education |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128399610216448 |