From the justices we have to the justices we want: the nomination process of the STF Justices (1988-2019)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Flávia Danielle Santiago
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Lima, Jairo Neia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
Texto Completo: http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/11225
Resumo: According to the judicialization of politics perspective, Constitutional Courts have reached an important role in democracies. In the last years, the main moral dilemmas and political controversies have been challenged before these institutions. In Brazil, the Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) represents a leading institutional voice, this position is the result of constituent choices, delegations of the Legislative and of the decisional practice of the STF. However, the increase of this central role is followed by an ongoing distrust on the democratic deficit of the Constitutional Court, either from the theoretical as practice perspective. The way the Justices are selected represents one of this democratic concern. Based on that problem, we developed an empirical research on the constitutional amendment proposals in Brazil (1988/2019) that have focused on the appointment process to become a Justice in the Supremo Tribunal Federal. In conclusion, the data indicate the existence of a significant demand for other institutions to participate in the nomination process.
id UPF-4_64307c5c4acf6084c4f4d59b07d5fe6e
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.upf.br:article/11225
network_acronym_str UPF-4
network_name_str Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling From the justices we have to the justices we want: the nomination process of the STF Justices (1988-2019)Dos ministros que temos aos ministros que queremos: o processo de nomeação dos Ministros do STF (1988-2019)According to the judicialization of politics perspective, Constitutional Courts have reached an important role in democracies. In the last years, the main moral dilemmas and political controversies have been challenged before these institutions. In Brazil, the Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) represents a leading institutional voice, this position is the result of constituent choices, delegations of the Legislative and of the decisional practice of the STF. However, the increase of this central role is followed by an ongoing distrust on the democratic deficit of the Constitutional Court, either from the theoretical as practice perspective. The way the Justices are selected represents one of this democratic concern. Based on that problem, we developed an empirical research on the constitutional amendment proposals in Brazil (1988/2019) that have focused on the appointment process to become a Justice in the Supremo Tribunal Federal. In conclusion, the data indicate the existence of a significant demand for other institutions to participate in the nomination process.De acordo com a perspectiva da judicialização da política, as Cortes Constitucionais alcançaram um papel de destaque nas democracias. Nos últimos anos, os principais dilemas morais e controvérsias políticas têm sido resolvidos por essas instituições. No Brasil, o Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) representa uma voz institucional destaque, essa posição representa o resultado de escolhas constituintes, delegações do Legislativo e da prática decisória do STF. No entanto, o aumento desse papel central é seguido por uma constante desconfiança do déficit democrático das Cortes Constitucionais, seja da perspectiva teórica quanto prática. A forma como os Ministros são escolhidos representa uma das preocupações democráticas. Com base nesse problema, desenvolvemos uma pesquisa empírica sobre as propostas de emendas constitucionais no Brasil (1988-2019) que objetivavam alterar o processo de indicação a Ministro do Supremo Tribunal Federal. Em conclusão, os dados indicam que existe uma demanda significa por participação de outras instituições no processo de nomeação.Universidade de Passo Fundo2021-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/1122510.5335/rjd.v35i2.11225Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 35 n. 2 (2021): Justiça do Direito; 95-129Law of Justice Journal; Vol 35 No 2 (2021): Justiça do Direito; 95-1292238-32121413-7038reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)instacron:UPFporhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/11225/114116185Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Justiça do Direitohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Flávia Danielle SantiagoLima, Jairo Neia2021-11-04T20:39:47Zoai:seer.upf.br:article/11225Revistahttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjdPUBhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/oairevistajusticadodireito@gmail.com2238-32121413-7038opendoar:2021-11-04T20:39:47Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv From the justices we have to the justices we want: the nomination process of the STF Justices (1988-2019)
Dos ministros que temos aos ministros que queremos: o processo de nomeação dos Ministros do STF (1988-2019)
title From the justices we have to the justices we want: the nomination process of the STF Justices (1988-2019)
spellingShingle From the justices we have to the justices we want: the nomination process of the STF Justices (1988-2019)
Lima, Flávia Danielle Santiago
title_short From the justices we have to the justices we want: the nomination process of the STF Justices (1988-2019)
title_full From the justices we have to the justices we want: the nomination process of the STF Justices (1988-2019)
title_fullStr From the justices we have to the justices we want: the nomination process of the STF Justices (1988-2019)
title_full_unstemmed From the justices we have to the justices we want: the nomination process of the STF Justices (1988-2019)
title_sort From the justices we have to the justices we want: the nomination process of the STF Justices (1988-2019)
author Lima, Flávia Danielle Santiago
author_facet Lima, Flávia Danielle Santiago
Lima, Jairo Neia
author_role author
author2 Lima, Jairo Neia
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Flávia Danielle Santiago
Lima, Jairo Neia
description According to the judicialization of politics perspective, Constitutional Courts have reached an important role in democracies. In the last years, the main moral dilemmas and political controversies have been challenged before these institutions. In Brazil, the Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) represents a leading institutional voice, this position is the result of constituent choices, delegations of the Legislative and of the decisional practice of the STF. However, the increase of this central role is followed by an ongoing distrust on the democratic deficit of the Constitutional Court, either from the theoretical as practice perspective. The way the Justices are selected represents one of this democratic concern. Based on that problem, we developed an empirical research on the constitutional amendment proposals in Brazil (1988/2019) that have focused on the appointment process to become a Justice in the Supremo Tribunal Federal. In conclusion, the data indicate the existence of a significant demand for other institutions to participate in the nomination process.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/11225
10.5335/rjd.v35i2.11225
url http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/11225
identifier_str_mv 10.5335/rjd.v35i2.11225
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/11225/114116185
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Justiça do Direito
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Justiça do Direito
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Passo Fundo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Passo Fundo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 35 n. 2 (2021): Justiça do Direito; 95-129
Law of Justice Journal; Vol 35 No 2 (2021): Justiça do Direito; 95-129
2238-3212
1413-7038
reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
instacron:UPF
instname_str Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
instacron_str UPF
institution UPF
reponame_str Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
collection Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistajusticadodireito@gmail.com
_version_ 1776750980938858496