Os limites da coisa julgada ante o princípio da igualdade tributária

• Autor(a) principal: Gomes, Maria do Socorro Costa
• Data de Publicação: 2015
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do Mackenzie
• Texto Completo: http://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/23881
• topic: tributação; relação jurídica tributária; coisa julgada; igualdade tributária; taxation; relationship legal tax; res judicata; tax equality; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO

The study hereby aims to analyze the institution of res judicata in tax matters and how it can affect the analysis of the constitutional principle of tax equality. This is because there may be imbalanced situations, according to a final decision on tax matters reaching a single taxpayer or to a limited number of them, to the detriment of others. The issue is complex and has not been pacified between the courts and scholars. To study the subject, it s analysed the situation in which a taxpayer obtains a favorable decision on tax matters; and it becomes unappealable in higher courts, including the Supreme Court. It will be discussed, here, the relationship legal tax and the institute of res judicata material in the harvest tax and its effects in the legal world and the role of the Judiciary, as a guarantor of the sculptured rights in the Constitution and in the conduct of the Brazilian democratic process. After, it s studied the analysis of the immutability of res judicata and how it can give its relativity to the legal relations continuatives - which are the majority in tax matters. The possibility of the relativity of the res judicata for the future aims the effectiveness of the principles of tax equality and focuses on fundamental vector assignment of legal certainty expressed in the dimension of justice. So it is that the combination of the essential elements focused on the treatment of res judicata and the interpretation of the limits imposed by the Constitution, appear at the end of this work, wondering in the sense that a final judgment, which violates the principle of equality tax, by placing a small number of taxpayers at an advantage over the others, can not be regarded as res judicata, being unconstitutional. The conclusion to be an unconstitutional sentence for offending fundamental principles in the Constitution. It s expected, as is, to rule out the effects of such decisium through provocation of the Supreme Court, to request the legal and economic recovery of the situation in view of the imbalance of equality, in the aspect of economic neutrality of taxes, which, failing to be taken seriously, infringes also the constitutional principle of free competition.