Avaliação do impacto do PRONAF sobre a agricultura familiar no município de Bonito, estado de Pernambuco, mediante o uso do Propensity Score Matching
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
Texto Completo: | http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/4451 |
Resumo: | The National Program for the Strengthening of Small-Farm Agriculture (PRONAF – Programa Nacional de Fortalecimento da Agricultura Familiar) is one of the most important public policies directed to small-farm agriculture. Attending about two million small-scale farmers per year, PRONAF contributes to the democratization of access to rural credit among a group of farmers that until then had remained on the margins of the financial system. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the PRONAF`s impact on small-farm agriculture in the municipality of Bonito, in the state of Pernambuco, by using the propensity score matching methodology (PSM). This method allows to compare the performance of a group affected by the implementation of a particular policy (treatment group) with another group that was not affected by the policy (control group). This research compared beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of PRONAF in the categories “investment”, “production” and “productivity”. The primary data were raised through semi-structured questionnaires applied to an intencional sample of small-scale farmers in the municipality of Bonito. The survey results show that PRONAF did not produce the expected impacts. Only in relation to the variable “investiment value”, the program had a positive impact, although not significant. Concerning the other variables the PRONAF had a negative but not significant impact. These results are consistent with those found in other reviews and indicate that the PRONAF primarily benefits those family farmers who are capitalized and integrated into agribusiness. |
id |
URPE_3d6cea43f0d8b15e350731f73df23805 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2:tede2/4451 |
network_acronym_str |
URPE |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
MÖLLER, Horst DieterVITAL, Tales WanderleyDUARTE, Gisléia BeniniCARMONA, Charles Ulises de MontreuilHAMPF, Anna Claudia2016-05-18T16:44:22Z2013-09-02HAMPF, Anna Claudia. Avaliação do impacto do PRONAF sobre a agricultura familiar no município de Bonito, estado de Pernambuco, mediante o uso do Propensity Score Matching. 2013. 127 f. Dissertação ( Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração e Desenvolvimento Rural) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/4451The National Program for the Strengthening of Small-Farm Agriculture (PRONAF – Programa Nacional de Fortalecimento da Agricultura Familiar) is one of the most important public policies directed to small-farm agriculture. Attending about two million small-scale farmers per year, PRONAF contributes to the democratization of access to rural credit among a group of farmers that until then had remained on the margins of the financial system. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the PRONAF`s impact on small-farm agriculture in the municipality of Bonito, in the state of Pernambuco, by using the propensity score matching methodology (PSM). This method allows to compare the performance of a group affected by the implementation of a particular policy (treatment group) with another group that was not affected by the policy (control group). This research compared beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of PRONAF in the categories “investment”, “production” and “productivity”. The primary data were raised through semi-structured questionnaires applied to an intencional sample of small-scale farmers in the municipality of Bonito. The survey results show that PRONAF did not produce the expected impacts. Only in relation to the variable “investiment value”, the program had a positive impact, although not significant. Concerning the other variables the PRONAF had a negative but not significant impact. These results are consistent with those found in other reviews and indicate that the PRONAF primarily benefits those family farmers who are capitalized and integrated into agribusiness.O Programa Nacional de Fortalecimento da Agricultura Familiar (PRONAF) é uma das políticas públicas mais importantes voltadas para a agricultura familiar. Atendendo cerca de dois milhões de agricultores familiares por ano, o PRONAF contribui para a democratização do acesso ao crédito rural entre um grupo de produtores rurais que até então tinha ficado às margens do sistema financeiro. O objetivo do presente estudo é avaliar o impacto do PRONAF sobre os agricultores familiares no município de Bonito, Estado de Pernambuco, mediante o uso do propensity score matching (PSM; Bras. “Escore de propensão para pareamento”). Este método permite comparar o desempenho de um grupo afetado pela implantação de determinada política (grupo de tratamento) com outro grupo que não foi afetado pela política (grupo de controle). No caso desta pesquisa foram comparados beneficiários e nãobeneficiários do PRONAF nas variáveis “valor de investimento (R$/ano)”, “valor de produção (R$/ano)”, “valor de produção por trabalhador (R$/ano)” e “valor de produção por hectare (R$/ano). Os dados primários foram levantados mediante a aplicação de questionários semiestruturados a uma amostra intencional de agricultores familiares do município de Bonito. Os resultados encontrados nesta pesquisa mostram que o PRONAF não produziu os impactos esperados. Somente na variável “valor de investimento” o programa teve um impacto positivo, porém não significante. Em relação às demais variáveis o PRONAF teve um impacto negativo embora não significante. Os resultados desta pesquisa são condizentes com aqueles encontrados em outras avaliações e indicam que o PRONAF beneficia sobretudo os agricultores familiares mais capitalizados e integrados à agroindústria.Submitted by (edna.saturno@ufrpe.br) on 2016-05-18T16:44:22Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Anna Claudia Hampf.pdf: 4085721 bytes, checksum: df2eae1b1cefbaa7c6f81bb9c2a992cf (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2016-05-18T16:44:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Anna Claudia Hampf.pdf: 4085721 bytes, checksum: df2eae1b1cefbaa7c6f81bb9c2a992cf (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-09-02application/pdfporUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Administração e Desenvolvimento RuralUFRPEBrasilDepartamento de AdministraçãoDesenvolvimento ruralAgricultura familiarPRONAFRural developmenSmall-farm agricultureOUTROS::ADMINISTRACAO RURALAvaliação do impacto do PRONAF sobre a agricultura familiar no município de Bonito, estado de Pernambuco, mediante o uso do Propensity Score Matchinginfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-14559930609208970600600600-3020915585334755221-2020477926198029066info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPEinstname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)instacron:UFRPELICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82089http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/4451/1/license.txt7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7MD51ORIGINALAnna Claudia Hampf.pdfAnna Claudia Hampf.pdfapplication/pdf4085721http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/4451/2/Anna+Claudia+Hampf.pdfdf2eae1b1cefbaa7c6f81bb9c2a992cfMD52tede2/44512024-02-23 12:51:54.06oai:tede2: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede/PUBhttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/oai/requestbdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.bropendoar:2024-05-28T12:31:47.478500Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação do impacto do PRONAF sobre a agricultura familiar no município de Bonito, estado de Pernambuco, mediante o uso do Propensity Score Matching |
title |
Avaliação do impacto do PRONAF sobre a agricultura familiar no município de Bonito, estado de Pernambuco, mediante o uso do Propensity Score Matching |
spellingShingle |
Avaliação do impacto do PRONAF sobre a agricultura familiar no município de Bonito, estado de Pernambuco, mediante o uso do Propensity Score Matching HAMPF, Anna Claudia Desenvolvimento rural Agricultura familiar PRONAF Rural developmen Small-farm agriculture OUTROS::ADMINISTRACAO RURAL |
title_short |
Avaliação do impacto do PRONAF sobre a agricultura familiar no município de Bonito, estado de Pernambuco, mediante o uso do Propensity Score Matching |
title_full |
Avaliação do impacto do PRONAF sobre a agricultura familiar no município de Bonito, estado de Pernambuco, mediante o uso do Propensity Score Matching |
title_fullStr |
Avaliação do impacto do PRONAF sobre a agricultura familiar no município de Bonito, estado de Pernambuco, mediante o uso do Propensity Score Matching |
title_full_unstemmed |
Avaliação do impacto do PRONAF sobre a agricultura familiar no município de Bonito, estado de Pernambuco, mediante o uso do Propensity Score Matching |
title_sort |
Avaliação do impacto do PRONAF sobre a agricultura familiar no município de Bonito, estado de Pernambuco, mediante o uso do Propensity Score Matching |
author |
HAMPF, Anna Claudia |
author_facet |
HAMPF, Anna Claudia |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
MÖLLER, Horst Dieter |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
VITAL, Tales Wanderley |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
DUARTE, Gisléia Benini |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
CARMONA, Charles Ulises de Montreuil |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
HAMPF, Anna Claudia |
contributor_str_mv |
MÖLLER, Horst Dieter VITAL, Tales Wanderley DUARTE, Gisléia Benini CARMONA, Charles Ulises de Montreuil |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Desenvolvimento rural Agricultura familiar PRONAF |
topic |
Desenvolvimento rural Agricultura familiar PRONAF Rural developmen Small-farm agriculture OUTROS::ADMINISTRACAO RURAL |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Rural developmen Small-farm agriculture |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
OUTROS::ADMINISTRACAO RURAL |
description |
The National Program for the Strengthening of Small-Farm Agriculture (PRONAF – Programa Nacional de Fortalecimento da Agricultura Familiar) is one of the most important public policies directed to small-farm agriculture. Attending about two million small-scale farmers per year, PRONAF contributes to the democratization of access to rural credit among a group of farmers that until then had remained on the margins of the financial system. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the PRONAF`s impact on small-farm agriculture in the municipality of Bonito, in the state of Pernambuco, by using the propensity score matching methodology (PSM). This method allows to compare the performance of a group affected by the implementation of a particular policy (treatment group) with another group that was not affected by the policy (control group). This research compared beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of PRONAF in the categories “investment”, “production” and “productivity”. The primary data were raised through semi-structured questionnaires applied to an intencional sample of small-scale farmers in the municipality of Bonito. The survey results show that PRONAF did not produce the expected impacts. Only in relation to the variable “investiment value”, the program had a positive impact, although not significant. Concerning the other variables the PRONAF had a negative but not significant impact. These results are consistent with those found in other reviews and indicate that the PRONAF primarily benefits those family farmers who are capitalized and integrated into agribusiness. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2013-09-02 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-05-18T16:44:22Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
HAMPF, Anna Claudia. Avaliação do impacto do PRONAF sobre a agricultura familiar no município de Bonito, estado de Pernambuco, mediante o uso do Propensity Score Matching. 2013. 127 f. Dissertação ( Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração e Desenvolvimento Rural) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/4451 |
identifier_str_mv |
HAMPF, Anna Claudia. Avaliação do impacto do PRONAF sobre a agricultura familiar no município de Bonito, estado de Pernambuco, mediante o uso do Propensity Score Matching. 2013. 127 f. Dissertação ( Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração e Desenvolvimento Rural) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife. |
url |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/4451 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-14559930609208970 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-3020915585334755221 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-2020477926198029066 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração e Desenvolvimento Rural |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFRPE |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Administração |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) instacron:UFRPE |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
instacron_str |
UFRPE |
institution |
UFRPE |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/4451/1/license.txt http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/4451/2/Anna+Claudia+Hampf.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7 df2eae1b1cefbaa7c6f81bb9c2a992cf |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.br |
_version_ |
1810102215087489024 |